A feature with Win 2000 amd eml files

2000-11-15 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, My laptop has got this small feature (bug). It keeps an associating the eml files with OutLook Express. Just about every time I start The Bat! I have to associate the files. I want keep the files attached to The bat! Can any one help? -

Re: Archiving Question

2000-11-15 Thread Kevin Tea
Hi Januk > If you don't mind a little duplication of data, your method works well. I ran some tests last night and it does work (much to my surprise, not because of The Bat! But because I worked it out ). This way I can keep the mailboxes lean and fast and save the important material on my Io

Re: Filtering query

2000-11-15 Thread Östen Häggmark
Hello Thomas, 16 nov 2000 11:20:56 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> Yes; TB will automatically create a new folder if the one you choose TF> does not exist yet. TF> A query would be nice: "Folder xxx does not exist. Create? Y/N". Yes that's it. Or it could be just delayed until I press t

The Bat! - bug report (Reading confirmation and manual message marking)

2000-11-15 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello The Bat! developers and TBUDL! I'm using The Bat! Version 1.47 Halloween Edition Serial Number 590E2F15 under Windows 95 4.0 Build B and would like to report a bug: The bug description: The Reading Confirmation request will not be displayed if the message in question has been marke

Re: Filtering query

2000-11-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Östen, On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 00:49:05 +0100GMT (16/11/2000, 07:49 +0800GMT), Östen Häggmark wrote: ÖH> It's a bit annoying that if I forget to set the "Move to folder:" ÖH> before pressing the "Edit" button, a new folder with the ÖH> pre-filled name is automatically created in the account root,

Re: TB default mail-prog?

2000-11-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Januk, On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:34:54 -0800GMT (16/11/2000, 06:34 +0800GMT), Januk Aggarwal wrote: JA> That works for Netscape 4.xx, but I seem to remember a recent thread JA> where someone mentioned that Netscape 6 is different. I don't know JA> the answer to the question, but the FAQ might n

Re: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15 November, 2000, 8:51 PM, I saw Susanne's comments made on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:43:14 -0800, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth: >> Why not post a sample RFC header for one of the German messages. We >> could examine it and tell if there

Re[2]: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread Susanne
Hi A., Wednesday, November 15, 2000, 5:07:05 PM, you wrote: > Why not post a sample RFC header for one of the German messages. We > could examine it and tell if there's an inordinate delay with respect to > its reaching your local mail server. If you explain to me what an RFC header is and how

Re: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 16:24:14 -0800, Susanne contributed this to the collective wisdom of the human race: >> The time zones shouldn't affect the sorting because the client >> compensates for this by taking the time zones into consideration when >>

Re: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Susanne, On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 at 16:24:14 GMT -0800 (which was 4:24 PM where I live) witnesses say Susanne typed: > This doesn't seem to work for messages from Germany. I get a lot > of them, mixed in with mail from the US and several other > countries and the german ones are always out

Re[2]: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread Susanne
Hi A., Wednesday, November 15, 2000, 2:31:47 PM, you wrote: > The time zones shouldn't affect the sorting because the client > compensates for this by taking the time zones into consideration when > sorting. TB! actually reflects this in the creation times it places in > the message list and the

Re: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread Manfred Ell
On 15-11-2000 at 18:37:19GMT -0500 (which was 23:37 where I live) A. Curtis Martin wrote regarding the subject of "Received time" > On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 23:11:58 +, Manfred Ell wrote these > words of wisdom: > [..] ME>> This is exactly the reason why I use the Creation-Time on the TB ME>> lis

Re: Filtering query

2000-11-15 Thread Östen Häggmark
Hello Marck and list, 14 nov 2000 13:28:24 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP> When I want to create a new filter, I start with MDP> Ctrl-Shift-F to create a base filter and use the "Override" MDP> checkbox and "Edit" button to tweak the new filter into the MDP> right place in the hierarchy

Re: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 23:11:58 +, Manfred Ell wrote these words of wisdom: [..] ME> This is exactly the reason why I use the Creation-Time on the TB ME> lists!! The Received time doesn't work (for me) well enough here. Why not sort by received tim

Re: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:49:53 -0800, David Tod Sigafoos wrote these comments about 'Received time': ACM>> Personally, I prefer the received time as TB! defines it. After-all, it ACM>> doesn't really matter to me when the server received the message be

Re: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread Manfred Ell
On 15-11-2000 at 14:49:53GMT -0800 (which was 22:49 where I live) David Tod Sigafoos wrote regarding the subject of "Received time" ACM>> Personally, I prefer the received time as TB! defines it. After-all, it ACM>> doesn't really matter to me when the server received the message because ACM>> I

Re: Editing received messages

2000-11-15 Thread Manfred Ell
On 15-11-2000 at 22:38:47GMT + (which was 22:38 where I live) Doug Weller wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages" > Apologies if this is an old chestnut, but I've used Becky and Calypso and > become dependent upon the ability to edit > the text and subject line of old messa

Re: Editing received messages

2000-11-15 Thread Manfred Ell
On 15-11-2000 at 22:38:47GMT + (which was 22:38 where I live) Doug Weller wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages" > Apologies if this is an old chestnut, but I've used Becky and Calypso and > become dependent upon the ability to edit > the text and subject line of old messa

Re[2]: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread David Tod Sigafoos
ACM> Personally, I prefer the received time as TB! defines it. After-all, it ACM> doesn't really matter to me when the server received the message because ACM> I haven't personally received it until I have downloaded it. Knowing ACM> when the mail hit my inbox is therefore more useful. I can tell

Editing received messages

2000-11-15 Thread Doug Weller
Apologies if this is an old chestnut, but I've used Becky and Calypso and become dependent upon the ability to edit the text and subject line of old messages. I use my mail reader as a temporary or permanent archive, and wouldn't want to lose this facility. I like The Bat -- is there any chance i

Re: Received time

2000-11-15 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15 November, 2000, 5:24 PM, I saw Susanne's comments made on Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:00:05 -0800, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth: S> Just a question about the time showing up in the message list as the S> received time. I was used to and

Re: TB default mail-prog?

2000-11-15 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Thomas, On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 at 23:38:51 GMT +0800 (which was 7:38 AM where I live) witnesses say Thomas Fernandez typed: KHT>> I'm using Netscape 6 and want to set up the Bat as the default mail KHT>> program. > 2.) Find the answer to your question at: > >

Re: Archiving Question

2000-11-15 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Kevin, On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 at 15:13:19 GMT GMT (which was 7:13 AM where I live) witnesses say Kevin Tea typed: > Looking at the actions facilities within the filter, would it be > possible to choose to extract the incoming emails to a continuously > appended text file at a specified lo

Re: password protection

2000-11-15 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Zeljko, On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 at 13:18:38 GMT +0100 (which was 4:18 AM where I live) witnesses say Zeljko Mirovic typed: > I can't figure out how I overlooked that is clearly written "Disabled > actions". Next time before asking question I will clean my glasses : If you're volun

Received time

2000-11-15 Thread Susanne
Hi, Just a question about the time showing up in the message list as the received time. I was used to and prefer it to be the time it was received on the server, but with The Bat it seems to be the time I download the mail. Is there a way to change this? I tried sorting it by the time created i

Re: TB default mail-prog?

2000-11-15 Thread Manfred Ell
On 15-11-2000 at 16:28:17GMT +0100 (which was 15:28 where I live) Kåre H. Tornes wrote regarding the subject of " TB default mail-prog? " > Hi! > I'm using Netscape 6 and want to set up the Bat as the default mail > program. > How do I do it? > Best regards > -kht- Hello Kåre H., I don'

Re: TB default mail-prog?

2000-11-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Kåre, On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 16:28:17 +0100 GMT (15/11/2000, 23:28 +0800 GMT), Kåre H. Tornes wrote: KHT> I'm using Netscape 6 and want to set up the Bat as the default mail KHT> program. KHT> How do I do it? 1.) Read the FAQ file at www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html 2.) Find the answer

TB default mail-prog?

2000-11-15 Thread Kåre H. Tornes
Hi! I'm using Netscape 6 and want to set up the Bat as the default mail program. How do I do it? Best regards -kht- -- Kåre H. Tornes [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Internett Studio AS http://www.internettstudio.as/ -

Re: Archiving Question

2000-11-15 Thread Kevin Tea
Hi Looking at the actions facilities within the filter, would it be possible to choose to extract the incoming emails to a continuously appended text file at a specified location and then choose to delete them from the main list after 30 days or whatever? Regards Kevin Batting along with 1

Re: Receiving Mail indefinitely

2000-11-15 Thread Dean
Hello Clearwater, Wednesday, November 15, 2000, 6:21:16 AM, you wrote: C> Hi BatListers, C> Often, the Receiving Mail box will open and "stick" on C> "getting number of messages" or "receiving 1 of x messages" - C> this continues indefinitely until I cancel. Unfortunately, C> cancelling cause

Re: password protection

2000-11-15 Thread Zeljko Mirovic
Januk Aggarwal said about "password protection": JA> By checking those options, you are *disabling* the features. To allow JA> a user to use those options, the check boxes must be *cleared*. I can't figure out how I overlooked that is clearly written "Disabled actions". Next time before ask

Archiving Question

2000-11-15 Thread Kevin Tea
Hi I've looked through the FAQ and Help file, so ... Has anyone worked out a way that you can automatically remove emails from a folder after so many days (that part's easy) and then transfer and store them in a specified directory? TIA Kevin -- ---

Receiving Mail indefinitely

2000-11-15 Thread Clearwater Landscapes
Hi BatListers, Often, the Receiving Mail box will open and "stick" on "getting number of messages" or "receiving 1 of x messages" - this continues indefinitely until I cancel. Unfortunately, cancelling causes all stored messages to be re-downloaded on the next check (I save on server for 1 day).