Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Nathan J. Yoder
It's long, I know, I'm sorry :( Friday, November 29, 2002, 12:18:10 AM, you wrote: JA> It's almost this kind of thinking (no offence) that starts getting JA> programs in trouble. I know mailto: URLs won't cause any halm (unless JA> you do permit certain headers to be set), but saying "well, just

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Richard Wakeford wrote... >> Start changing things, or flexing the rules slightly, and you end >> up having all kinds of problems. > Unless you're Microsnort in which case you can design a browser that > doesn't confor

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jonathan, Thu, 28 Nov 2002 at 23:18:10[GMT -0600](05:18 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : > Start changing things, or flexing the rules slightly, and you end up > having all kinds of problems. Unless you're Microsnort in which case you can design a brows

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Nathan J. Yoder wrote... JA>> I think that is correct behavior per RFCs. Special characters JA>> such as spaces, &, and such are supposed to converted to the hex JA>> version. > ... JA>> So TB! is only behaving as per t

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Nathan J. Yoder
Thursday, November 28, 2002, 9:37:47 AM, you wrote: JA> I think that is correct behavior per RFCs. Special characters such as JA> spaces, &, and such are supposed to converted to the hex version. ... JA> So TB! is only behaving as per the rules. You'll find it is the other JA> mail clients that a

Re: Mass mailings

2002-11-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Clive, @28-Nov-2002, 19:25 Clive Taylor [CT] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: CT> Incidentally, there seems to have been in glitch in the TBUDL CT> server. Hardly any messages for two days then a rush this CT> evening. Yes - for

Re: Editing received messages

2002-11-28 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Nick, MR>> What I then do is this: > MR>> 1) I place a "! " at the beginning of each memo, then... > > > Melissa, nice bit of lateral thinking! Yes, it certainly is. Thanks Melissa :-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 _

Re: Alternative forward

2002-11-28 Thread Richard Evans
Hi Richard, On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, at 19:45:19 [GMT +] you wrote: RE> Hi TBUDL, RE> On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, at 14:19:14 [GMT +0100] you wrote: LG>> Hi Gerard, LG>> On Tuesday, November 12, 2002 at 13:53:27 [GMT +0100], you wrote: G>>> Currently I have to use the Alternative Forward method to get

Re: Mass mailings

2002-11-28 Thread Clive Taylor
27 November 2002, 23:14, you wrote: MDP> Start a new message and write the whole thing in one go. Then, MDP> instead of sending it, copy the message body to the clipboard, open MDP> the mass mail quick template and paste the text in. Cancel the MDP> message and you should then be all set. That's t

Re: Gmane and TheBat!

2002-11-28 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Roelof, On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, at 17:54:51 GMT +0100 (11/28/2002, 10:54 AM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: RO> But the worst thing of all is clearly that somebody thought it a RO> good idea to gate a mailing list to news without telling the list RO> m

Re: Gmane and TheBat!

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Roelof Otten wrote... O>> The decision not to be an "ordinary" open news group was no doubt O>> made after ample consideration and for very good reasons, but I O>> would be interested to hear other the opinion of other

Re: Stupid question about Avg and the bats plug-in

2002-11-28 Thread Luc
Good evening Roelof, It was foretold that on 28-11-2002 @ 11:15:53 GMT+0100 (which was 11:15:53 where I live) Roelof Otten would mumble: RO> When I test my AV-settings, I send a message to RO> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with in the message body: Something new i learned today :-) RO> What it does is

Re: Gmane and TheBat!

2002-11-28 Thread Ochrid
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:54:51 +0100, Roelof Otten wrote: > But the worst thing of all is clearly that somebody thought it a good > idea to gate a mailing list to news without telling the list members > that he was compromising their e-mail address. Indeed. I wondered if TBUDL-people (i.e Marck) ha

Re: Gmane and TheBat!

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Carsten Thönges wrote... >> I stumbled on the Gmane-project (http://gmane.org/) > Gmane is great! This mail comes to you via Gmane. (Sorry for this > test, hm, is everything okay with this mail?) I guess somebody subs

Re: Gmane and TheBat!

2002-11-28 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Ochrid, On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:18:28 +0100GMT (28-11-02, 14:18 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: O> The decision not to be an "ordinary" open news group was no doubt O> made after ample consideration and for very good reasons, but I O> would be interested to hear other the opinion of othe

Re[2]: Editing received messages

2002-11-28 Thread Nick Dutton
Melissa, Wednesday, November 27, 2002, 8:02:00 PM, you wrote: MR> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MR> Hash: RIPEMD160 MR> On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 6:26:09 AM PST, Nick Dutton wrote: >> Is there any way that I can edit a received message? I use many of >> my TB folders for reference

Re: Gmane and TheBat!

2002-11-28 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Ochrid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I stumbled on the Gmane-project (http://gmane.org/) while looking for > a post to do with TheBat! Gmane makes it very easy to follow TBUDL as > any other newsgroup. I have only just started doing this, but think > that I will prefer reading TBUDL-messages

Re: Gmane and TheBat!

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Ochrid wrote... > I stumbled on the Gmane-project (http://gmane.org/) while looking > for a post to do with TheBat! Gmane makes it very easy to follow > TBUDL as any other newsgroup. I have only just started doing this,

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Nathan J. Yoder wrote... > I think I've found a minor, but annoying mailto: bug. With an HTML > link that uses the mailto: and a subject line (i.e. href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=hello how are you) The Bat! may

Re: Missing Messages

2002-11-28 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, 7:10 PM, you wrote: GL> Strangely, when I searched for lost folders, TB found 27 -- the backup GL> folders that I created on another drive! So, having found lost folders GL> and deleted the TBI files on the "empty" ones, I have two copies of GL> most of my mail f

Re: setcolourgroup macro

2002-11-28 Thread Gerard
ON Thursday, November 28, 2002, 2:04:33 PM, you wrote: G>> But just to be sure, I will not write "Strip me naked and colour me G>> green" S> I don't know, you might get a few very interesting propositions if you left S> that in ;-) Well you should know, being of a slightly orange colour

Gmane and TheBat!

2002-11-28 Thread Ochrid
I stumbled on the Gmane-project (http://gmane.org/) while looking for a post to do with TheBat! Gmane makes it very easy to follow TBUDL as any other newsgroup. I have only just started doing this, but think that I will prefer reading TBUDL-messages through Gmane. Perhaps posting too, later on,

Re: setcolourgroup macro

2002-11-28 Thread Simon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 'Lo Gerard, On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:39:49 +0100 your time, you said: G> But just to be sure, I will not write "Strip me naked and colour me G> green" I don't know, you might get a few very interesting propositions if you left that in ;-) G>

Re: setcolourgroup macro

2002-11-28 Thread Gerard
ON Thursday, November 28, 2002, 1:35:29 PM, you wrote: S> Mind you, if the recipients of your messages have clients that display S> comments they might find your 'secret code' it a little puzzling Simon, Very few people do that, in fact I think most of them are here on the list :-) But ju

Re: setcolourgroup macro

2002-11-28 Thread Simon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 'Lo Gerard, On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:19:58 +0100 your time, you said: G> That's a good idea, thanks. Mind you, if the recipients of your messages have clients that display comments they might find your 'secret code' it a little puzzling - -- S

Re: setcolourgroup macro

2002-11-28 Thread Gerard
ON Thursday, November 28, 2002, 11:01:06 AM, you wrote: RO>>> Use in your template RO>>> %comment="green message" RO>>> and use an outgoing filter that triggers on "comments: green message" G>> Is that the comment header in the kludges? RO> Guilty as charged. That's a good idea, thanks. --

Re: Stupid question about Avg and the bats plug-in

2002-11-28 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Krister, On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:11:20 +0100GMT (27-11-02, 16:11 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: KE> I'm currently evaluating the pro version of Avg and the bat plug-in, KE> and i'm not sure i've done everything correctly. If you can see the plug-in in: Options -> Virus protection you'

Re: setcolourgroup macro

2002-11-28 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Gerard, On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 08:42:31 +0100GMT (28-11-02, 8:42 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: RO>> Use in your template RO>> %comment="green message" RO>> and use an outgoing filter that triggers on "comments: green message" G> Is that the comment header in the kludges? Guilty as char

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Nathan! On Thursday, November 28, 2002 at 8:03:53 AM you wrote: > I think I've found a minor, but annoying mailto: bug. This is not actually a bug, simply a malformed value for the protocol used. There are no blanks allowed in such links unless they are correctly encoded as "%20" (without

Re: Authentication configuration

2002-11-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allister, on Thu, 28 Nov 2002 21:02:43 +1300GMT (28.11.02, 09:02 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : AJ> Could someone who knows about such things please help me out by AJ> explaining (or giving directions) how TB can address this? Go to Account properties

Authentication configuration

2002-11-28 Thread Allister Jenks
Hi folks, Could I ask for a little help please. I just received the email attached below from my hosting provider. After reading the email I thought I'd be able to configure The Bat! to suit, but after taking a look at what I think is the right area I am not so sure! Could someone who knows abo