Working great here so far!
-
Thanks,
runamonk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, January 26, 2003, 8:07:11 PM, runamonk Scribbed:
TF> Hello Bruno,
TF> On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 10:56:30 -0500 GMT (25/01/03, 22:56 +0700 GMT),
TF> Bruno Fernandes wrote:
>> Anyone else having trouble posting to the list today?
Hello Bruno,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 10:56:30 -0500 GMT (25/01/03, 22:56 +0700 GMT),
Bruno Fernandes wrote:
> Anyone else having trouble posting to the list today? After getting
> around he fact that digests of these lists lack a reply-to address I'm
> finding that mail sent to the list is not going
Anyone else having trouble posting to the list today? After getting
around he fact that digests of these lists lack a reply-to address I'm
finding that mail sent to the list is not going through due to some
server authentication error with the list's address. Hrmpph.
I suppose this message is so
I've read enough information in the archives to know TB! does not
support automatic bursting of MIME digests. But that it's possible
using filters as a work-around. First, I'd like to officially request
that MIME digest bursting be added to the program. This is a pretty
basic feature for a "p
Hello ~John,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 20:06:21 -0600 GMT (27/01/03, 09:06 +0700 GMT),
~John wrote:
> How would I go about filtering every charset except my own ?
> Or in other words, has anyone had any problems filtering everything
> except charset=US ?
I would go about by using charset=US as the str
How would I go about filtering every charset except my own ?
Or in other words, has anyone had any problems filtering everything
except charset=US ?
--
Best Regards,
~John,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
ht
Saturday, January 25, 2003, 6:35:38 PM, Daniel wrote:
DG>AOL users who hit their [Reply] button, generate a reply addressed
DG>to me, and only to me.
Yes but you're saying they're using the reply function... I'm
suggesting they should use the Reply All function which I understand
from A
Sunday, January 26, 2003, 10:27:29 AM, greekdivers wrote:
g>The eml are associated with the bat, What i can do to prevent this
g>from appearing except "don't check eml extensions at startup"
Have you checked the menu entry for file associations to make sure it
is ticked?
Options » Prefe
Sunday, January 26, 2003, 2:11:36 PM, Mark wrote:
MP> I don't know if it has anything to do with it, but since I chose to
MP> let The Bat handle Mapi, that first worked fine, now however, when I
MP> click on an Email-address (mailto:), multiple copies of Internet
MP> Explorer start up and in most
Hello Miguel,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 14:22:26[GMT +0100](which was 13:22 where I
live) you wrote:
> I am sure you have seen in this and other TB
> lists "MID links" like:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If you double click on it it will "jump" and take you to the root
> messa
Hello Miguel,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 16:54:09[GMT +0100](which was 15:54 where I
live) you wrote:
> Alt+Left_Arrow (or right click and select "Move to previously
> viewed").
But that only takes you back the messages you have read in that
particular session. It doesn't take you to the number (1)
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 16:18:22[GMT +0100](which was 15:18 where I
live) you wrote:
> Select (1), than select two and read it. Now use + to move
> to the "previous selected message" and + to move to the "next
> selected message". This way you can toggle between (1) and the (2) you
>
Hello Peter,
> And how to "jump back" from (1) to _the correct_ (2)? That's
> difficulty if there're several "second level" replies, isn't it?
Alt+Left_Arrow (or right click and select "Move to previously
viewed").
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
_
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 16:27:02 +0100 GMT (26/01/03, 22:27 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
TF>> Or a kind of blockage, so that you get a dialog box when you try to
TF>> back up to the same file.
> You mean something like:
> C:\bla\quirk\backup.tbk already exists.
> Do you want to
Hello Thomas,
On Saturday, January 25, 2003 at 11:04:41 PM you [TF] wrote (at least
in part):
PP>>> Have you chosen the existing archive and the new archive being the
PP>>> same file?
>> Perhaps a note in the help file to warn of this would be useful for
>> new users?
Seems to be a good idea. I
Hello Richard,
On Sunday, January 26, 2003 at 11:10:59 AM you [RW] wrote (at least in
part):
RW> Yes, so I want to be able to have an option that, whilst reading the
RW> third number 2 message, I can toggle between that and the original
RW> number 1.
And how to "jump back" from (1) to _the corre
Hello Bats,
I don't know if it has anything to do with it, but since I chose to
let The Bat handle Mapi, that first worked fine, now however, when I
click on an Email-address (mailto:), multiple copies of Internet
Explorer start up and in most cases (when I can't close them fast
enough) make hang
Hello Richard,
> Let's hope the option is implemented although I've been away for a
> few days and still haven't visited the wishlist - off there now.
It should be fairly easy to implement since they already have some of
the needed code there. I am sure you have seen in this and other TB
lists "M
Hello tbudl,
When i hit an e-mail URL i get 2 new messages windows instead of 1.
Is there a registry fix for that?
Also many times at The bat start up i get a window
Associate eml with The bat?
The eml are associated with the bat, What i can do to prevent this
from appearing e
Hello Thorsten,
You forgot to add your own words of wisdom which I was looking forward
to reading ;-(
--
Best regards,
Richard
| Using The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/5
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera.
Only a mediocre person is always at h
Hi Richard,
Sonntag, 26. Januar 2003 11:29 you wrote:
RW> Hello Roelof,
RW> On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 08:42:44[GMT +0100](which was 07:42 where I
RW> live) you wrote:
>> Yes. you're probably sorting in descending order, but that wouldn't
>> really matter.
RW> I am sorting that way and I agree, it
Hello Roelof,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 08:42:44[GMT +0100](which was 07:42 where I
live) you wrote:
> Yes. you're probably sorting in descending order, but that wouldn't
> really matter.
I am sorting that way and I agree, it shouldn't matter but it does
seem to. If I turn it off the threading chan
Hello Anthony,
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 at 18:51:49[GMT -0800](which was 02:51 where I
live) you wrote:
>> I've searched high and low through the key strokes list and can't find
>> out how to move to the "original" message that I am reading the answer
>> to.
> Ctrl + Backspace
Just found out that, i
23 matches
Mail list logo
