Hello Roelof, On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 08:42:44[GMT +0100](which was 07:42 where I live) you wrote:
> Yes. you're probably sorting in descending order, but that wouldn't > really matter. I am sorting that way and I agree, it shouldn't matter but it does seem to. If I turn it off the threading changes considerably but I'm being difficult because I prefer descending order :-) > And you're having unchecked: > Options -> Preferences -> Message list -> Automatically adjust first > column width for threaded view No, that's always been checked. > What I mean by level is this (all messages with same level have same > number): > 1-Blablabla > | > 2-Re:Blablabla > | > 2-Re:Blablabla > | | > | 3-Re:Blablabla > | | > | 4-Re:Blablabla > | > 2-Re:Blablabla > | > 3-Re:Blablabla Yes, so I want to be able to have an option that, whilst reading the third number 2 message, I can toggle between that and the original number 1. That would seem to be a useful option whether reading in descending order or not. If the read message ID were included in the reply, as per Anthony in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> then it is possible to click on that and the whole thread comes up in the "View Folder" box but I never use that. I always rely on the main Bat! display (as per your screenshot) to do all my reading. Thanks for taking the time to send me the screenshot though. -- Best regards, Richard | Using The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/5 | Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 | and using the best browser: Opera. Lead me not into temptation. I can find it myself. ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
