Re: %Language Macro lock-ups

Hello Roberto, > If Language is set to 'American English" all is well, but if > set to "SP" or "Spanish", I get the lock-up. Now, that is even more strange. Do you notice any problem if you select Spanish manually instead of with the %Language macro? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escori

Why do I get this Spam?

I sometimes get spam that doesn't appear to contain anything in the headers that should cause it to be sent to me! An example header follows: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c-66-177-108-82.se.client2.attbi.com (66.177.108.82) by mk-cpfrontend.uk.tiscali.com (6.7.018) id 3

Re: %Language Macro lock-ups

Good morning Roberto Machorro ! On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 16:52:24 -0400 GMT your local time, which was 04.06.2003, 22:52 (GMT+0200) where I live, you (Roberto Machorro) wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > You will find it below, the %Quotes macro is from Marc's excellent > website. If Language is set

Re: Why do I get this Spam?

Good morning Phil ! On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:22:51 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 05.06.2003, 11:22 (GMT+0200) where I live, you (Phil Phil) wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I sometimes get spam that doesn't appear to contain anything in the > headers that should cause it to be sent to me

Re: Why do I get this Spam?

> I sometimes get spam that doesn't appear to contain anything > in the headers that should cause it to be sent to me! BCC > Can anyone explain why I get these and also the best way to > avoid receiving them in the future? Someone has gotten your e-ddress and want you to hand over your ha

Re: Why do I get this Spam?

Hi, Phil wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : > I sometimes get spam that doesn't appear to contain anything in the > headers that should cause it to be sent to me! The headers you get to see in a received email are only part of the story. When an email is submitted to a mail server for delivery t

Beta list

Dear Moderators, Is this link still valid: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -=Robert & Beata Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=- ~~ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Embedded%20key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Attached%20key ~~~

Beta list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Robert, @5-Jun-2003, 15:56 +0300 (13:56 UK time) Robert Golovniov said: > Is this link still valid: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. Not for a long time. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the one you want, as it says on the TBUDLInfo page and the FAQ web site :-)

Re[2]: %Language Macro lock-ups

If I choose Spanish manually everything works the way it should, actually that's what I'm doing right now instead of using the Macro, which is a pain. I loved that Macro :`( I've installed the International package several times because I thought that maybe something had gone corrupt, but nothing.

Re[2]: Why do I get this Spam?

Hello St, Thursday, June 5, 2003, 2:17:36 PM, you wrote: > Do they? Please give me a link, man! Unsolicited? C'mon! Terry should click here: > http://stromgrade.its-toasted.org/mailman/options/tbudl/tgmunson%40sbcglobal.net I guess I am too thick to understand...are you telling me I should uns

%Language Macro lock-ups

Hi all, I just started having this strange lock-up problem. On folders where I have the %Language macro setup, whenever I do a Reply TB! freezes up and it's processor use goes up to 94%, I've left it sitting there for a while thinking it might finish up doing whatever it's doing but no luck. If I

Re: %Language Macro lock-ups

Good afternoon Roberto Machorro ! On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:55:48 -0400 GMT your local time, which was 04.06.2003, 16:55 (GMT+0200) where I live, you (Roberto Machorro) wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > %Language="Spanish" Wrong syntax? Only a guess, but my help file says %LANGUAGE="SP"

Re[2]: PC Lock ups and generally slow performance of The Bat!

Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 12:14:57 AM, you wrote: MP> Hello John, MP> Tuesday, June 3, 2003, 11:39:36 PM, you wrote: JM>> Hello Daniel, you wrote: JM I would recommend switching to Kerio Personal Firewall and AntiVir JM antivirus. More than likely ZoneAlarm is causing your problems. >>

Re: PC Lock ups and generally slow performance of The Bat!

Hello Mark, On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, at 01:14:57 GMT +0200 (6/3/2003, 6:14 PM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in : MP> Can we deduce from Laurence's mail that this setup was identical before and MP> after the HD-crash: ... I don't think you can make this deduction unless the recover

Re[2]: PC Lock ups and generally slow performance of The Bat!

On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 12:00:56 PM, you wrote: GS> See Martin's message at mid: [EMAIL PROTECTED] about the MS patch GS> 811493 which has been confirmed. Since the MS link is either invalid or GS> the site down IIRC the patch slows applications on startup. The link isn't invalid, it unfortun

Quoted text in replies - back again...

Hello everyone, I've started dealing more and more with Lotus Notes users (sigh) and one of my favourite TB! tricks is failing because the "From" field does not contain the full "User Name". So for Joe Bloggs at Strange Company, I get jbsc instead of JB. Has anyone out there got a suggestion to:

Re: turn-receipt

Hello Stefan, On Thu, 29 May 2003, at 16:37:17 GMT -0400 (5/29/2003, 3:37 PM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in : ST> I think the best way to get rid of SPAM is to get people to sign ST> messages using PGP or S/MIME and consider only signed content. Well, ST> it's a dream, you k

Re[2]: %Language Macro lock-ups

No luck. I tried re-installing everything but still doesn't work. The weirdest part is that it was working before! :( Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 11:22:59 AM, you wrote: > Good afternoon Roberto Machorro ! > On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:55:48 -0400 GMT your local time, > which was 04.06.2003, 16:55 (G

Re: PC Lock ups and generally slow performance of The Bat!

Hello Laurence, Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 5:55:26 PM, you wrote: LE> Have wiped HDD, re-installed XP Pro and again patched to SP1 + latest patches (- 811493 LE> security patch). On a plain system - No AV or Software firewall - it LE> is still slow and locking up the PC. LE> Any chance that

Re: PC Lock ups and generally slow performance of The Bat!

Hello Greg, Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 6:00:56 PM, you wrote: MP>> Can we deduce from Laurence's mail that this setup was identical before and MP>> after the HD-crash: ... GS> I don't think you can make this deduction unless the recovery was from GS> an drive or partition image. Yes, of course,

Re: Return-receipt

Thursday, May 29, 2003, 1:23:39 PM, you wrote: RO>> And that's what makes it a privacy issue (to me). Unless you're RO>> running your own MTA you can't influence it. I'm late in my thread. But I only just noticed something. From some impressions and Roelof's comment, it seemed like TB mustn't ha

*new* No body in message and incorrect date

Hi Guys and Gals I'm trying to send out a newsletter directly from out mail server (not via The Bat), but when I send one to myself and receive it in The Bat I am getting a message that has no body to it and it has the date Sat, 30 Dec 1899 00:00:00. However, if I look at the source everythi

Re: Quoted text in replies - back again...

Hello Nick, Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 6:21:53 PM, you wrote: ND> So for Joe Bloggs at Strange Company, I get jbsc instead of JB. ND> Has anyone out there got a suggestion to: ND> a) take the initials from that users AB entry ('cos they're all ND> there) ND> or ND> b) take the initials of the n

Re: *new* No body in message and incorrect date

Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 2:23:56 PM, Paul wrote: P> I'm trying to send out a newsletter directly from out mail P> server (not via The Bat), but when I send one to myself and P> receive it in The Bat I am getting a message that has no body P> to it and it has the date Sat, 30 Dec 1899 00:00:00. Usi

Re: Quoted text in replies - back again...

* Nick Dutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [ b0rked from names causing ugly initials ] > So for Joe Bloggs at Strange Company, I get jbsc instead of JB. > Has anyone out there got a suggestion to: > a) take the initials from that users AB entry ('cos they're all > there) This one builds the quo

QT Help.

Hello , Just a quick Question, I have to deal with a Company whose reply templates are like this: NEW MESSAGE Original Message Follows. - ORIGINAL MESSAGE Now as you are aware, TB will take the first -- and cut it as the signature because of the QT I have s

[no subject]

Hello tbudl, Another one, If I need to Dynamicly change the FROM Address based on the TO Address how can I do this in Templates (Reply and New Templates) -- Best regards, Michael ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) No answer is also an answer. http://.thompsonmike.co.uk/ PGP KeyID := 0x402A090

Re: %Language Macro lock-ups

Hello Roberto, > No luck. I tried re-installing everything but still doesn't work. The > weirdest part is that it was working before! :( Can you send a copy of your reply template? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.62i __

Re[2]: %Language Macro lock-ups

Hi! Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 4:42:06 PM, you wrote: > Can you send a copy of your reply template? You will find it below, the %Quotes macro is from Marc's excellent website. If Language is set to 'American English" all is well, but if set to "SP" or "Spanish", I get the lock-up. === BEGIN === %

Re: QT Help.

Hello tb, On 4 Jun 2003 at 20:27:59 +0100 GMT [21:27 CEST] you wrote: ttcu> Hello , ttcu> Just a quick Question, ttcu> I have to deal with a Company whose reply templates are like this: ttcu> NEW MESSAGE ttcu> Original Message Follows. ttcu> - ttcu> ORIGINAL M

Re:

Hello Michael, On 4 Jun 2003 at 20:37:08 +0100 GMT [21:37 CEST] you wrote: MT> Hello tbudl, MT> Another one, If I need to Dynamicly change the FROM Address based on MT> the TO Address how can I do this in Templates (Reply and New MT> Templates) Create an addresbook entry for each to addre

Re: QT Help.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tb, @4-Jun-2003, 20:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [T] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: T> My question is, how can I not have this macro active when replying T> to certain emails? Define a special reply template in the address book entry for that company

Re: Attachments

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, 12:07:25 PM, Allie wrote: DK>> Hm. Just tried it, and no, it seems that attachment is stored DK>> with original message. If I delete all the attachments from DK>> attachment directory, messages still keep the attachments - b