Hello,
I want to filter all email from a certain user to various folders but
first set some flags. How do I do that? It looks as though I have to
set a folder for the email to go to, and I don't want to do that, I
want other filters to decide which folder it should go to depending on
Hello Doug,
On Sunday, October 19, 2003, 8:15:20 AM, you wrote:
I want to filter all email from a certain user to various folders but
first set some flags. How do I do that? It looks as though I have to
set a folder for the email to go to, and I don't want to do that, I
want other
Hello Doug,
I want to filter all email from a certain user to various folders but
first set some flags. How do I do that? It looks as though I have to
set a folder for the email to go to, and I don't want to do that, I
want other filters to decide which folder it should go to
Hi Edgar,
on Sat, 18 Oct 2003 18:57:57 +0200GMT (18.10.03, 18:57 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
E I Use only the %SIGNCOMPLETE (and have Enable OpenPGP on in the
E account (under options))
E Must I use the %USEPGP also then?
No, I mentioned it just in case it should apply
Hi ETM,
on Sun, 19 Oct 2003 01:26:53 -0400GMT (19.10.03, 07:26 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
E Is there a way to do a selective restore, just going for that one
E folder in the backup?
I'm not quite sure, because I don't have a TB!-internal backup. If I
follow the Restore
Hi Vasiliy,
on Sat, 18 Oct 2003 22:57:16 +0300GMT (18.10.03, 21:57 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PM https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001512
VE Thank for link, I saw. But some people says that on their computers it's
VE all OK. So, in what the
Hello Allie,
Friday, October 17, 2003, 4:31:43 AM, you wrote:
AM In my case, I've been signing all messages to the list. It's the same
AM key that I've been using since I've been signing my messages as
AM moderator.
By the way Allie, your Key has expired. Are you simply going to change
the
Hello BAT! Talk Users,
. :
VE.
VE ?
VE (TheBat!)
VE,
VE .
VE ., ,
VE , :( (
VE )., , ,
VE SMTP-( KievWeb)
VE ().
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL!
I've noticed that the header information when displayed with
Ctrl-Shift-K when using Rich Text/HTML Viewer mode seems to word
wrap the header information. The F9 viewer still looks okay. For
example, this:
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
PM I'm not quite sure, because I don't have a TB!-internal
PM backup. If I follow the Restore process as far as I can,
PM there's at least an option to select Folders only...
PM If you happen to use Allie's RAR backup, it is easy. Unpack and select
PM any single item to restore.
Thanks for
Hi Vasiliy,
on Sun, 19 Oct 2003 16:17:50 +0300GMT (19.10.03, 15:17 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
VE Hello BAT! Talk Users,
VE. :
Folder template? ;-)
--
Cheers
Peter
Things working well, no problems. Time to upgrade.
Winamp currently playing: Julian Bream -
Hello tbudl,
To scroll a message in the viewer I always use the arrow keys. If I
remember well, 90% sure g, that did work too for HTML.
Now I can use those keys only for plain text. Maybe due to version 2
or something else?
In HTML view the blinking cursor, needed for arrow-scrolling,
Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly
PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off
using it. Thankyou
--
Best regards
Barry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version
Hello TBTECH Users,
How can I replace by macros the field To: by value from Address Book
during replying?
For example, I received some mail from my friend Yuriy Batjkovich
whose name are presents in Address Book. But he wrote mail from Yura
[EMAIL PROTECTED], so during replying
Hello Peter,
On 19 October 2003, at 15:40:04 (GMT +0200) you wrote:
VE. :
PM Folder template? ;-)
Giggle... Sorry, I sent my mail in wrong address :) My mail meens for
Russian conference. This is because my templates for new letters have
error. Sorry again.
--
Best regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 18, 2003, 13:19, Kevin Coates [KC] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm going to answer myself because I'm very bored. :) Actually,
something strange is happening and I can't figure it out.
KC This leads me to believe that there is a problem
Hi Kevin,
@19-Oct-2003, 09:27 -0400 (14:27 UK time) Kevin Coates said:
I've noticed that the header information when displayed with
Ctrl-Shift-K when using Rich Text/HTML Viewer mode seems to word
wrap the header information.
... snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MDP There is already a bug report on this in the BT.
Can I view the bug track list of reported issues so that I don't report something
already reported? (unless multiple reports raise the importance of the issue to be
resolved.)
Current
Hello rich,
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:40:11 -0400 GMT (19/10/2003, 22:40 +0700 GMT),
rich gregory wrote:
Can I view the bug track list of reported issues so that I don't
report something already reported?
Yes: www.ritlabs.com/bt
(unless multiple reports raise the importance of the issue to be
Dear TB Users
OK, my curiosity got the better of me and I've upgraded to
version 2!
I'd stuck with 1.62 because of the apparent folder problems with
1.63 on, but I thought that would have been fixed by now. :(
Two days in and TB has just lost half my folders and screwed
Hi Barry,
On Sunday at 9:26 AM you wrote:
BH Is TB2 really this flaky?
BH Should I go back to 1.62?
BH Can I go back to 1.62?
BH Have I wasted my money? :((
I have never in my 2 years have had a single problem with TB. I dont
think youve wasted your money at all. Maybe you
Hi Barry,
@18-Oct-2003, 17:26 Barry Higginbottom [BH] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to The:
BH Is TB2 really this flaky?
No. 1.62 was and it left your folders in that state. Now you've
fixed them they'll stay straight.
BH Should I go back to 1.62?
Why? You want your folders messed up again?
On Sunday, October 19, 2003, 5:35:31 PM, Vasiliy Efimenko wrote:
VE Giggle... Sorry, I sent my mail in wrong address :) My mail meens for
VE Russian conference. This is because my templates for new letters have
VE error. Sorry again.
No problem with me. :-) We you able to get any answer
On Sunday, October 19, 2003, 4:49:47 PM, Plusnet wrote:
P Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly
P PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off
P using it. Thankyou
Simply put, this is a program that allows you to 1. Digitally sign
your
NA By the way Allie, your Key has expired. Are you simply going to change
NA the expiry date... or generate an entirely new Key?
...and if you generate a new key, wouldn't that invalidate your whole
argument for sending signed messages to the listserv?
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63
Vasiliy-
This is very cool. I didn't realize I could display Cyrillic
characters without changing the language set.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL
Hello Allie,
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JM Thanks Mr. Raftery! I've tried to read up on it on some of the
JM websites about PGP, but its like a foreign language to me, I just
JM don't understand how it works. Is there a PGP 101 site :)
Ah great. :) I'd be willing to
Hi Mark,
on Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:52:57 -0700GMT (19.10.03, 20:52 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
NA By the way Allie, your Key has expired. Are you simply going to change
NA the expiry date... or generate an entirely new Key?
MW ...and if you generate a new key, wouldn't
Hello All,
Most people use OE. When I use the openPGP and sign messages
(including nomime) TB! makes a message that is signed but as mime
mail (if I'm correct). This can not be checked in OE.
When I use the sign complete message it goes trough the
clipboards and OE can check it.
Can I automate
Howdy,
I have often wondered about the default LDAP server entries that come
pre-configured in TB's address books window (Bigfoot, Infospace,
Switchboard, etc.). I don't use LDAP (right now) so I am wondering if
there is any reason to keep those entries.
For those in the know about LDAP, I have
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:54:58 -0700 GMT(19/10/2003, 7:54 PM
+ GMT), Mark Wieder wrote:
MW Vasiliy-
MW This is very cool. I didn't realize I could display
MW Cyrillic characters without changing the language set.
Nor did a lot of us, I suspect :-)
BTW, I've changed the account I use for
Hello Robert,
On 19 October 2003, at 20:03:23 (GMT +0300) you wrote:
RG We you able to get any answer from them yet?
Sorry, I can't understand that you meant.
, ? , .
,
:)
--
Best regards,
Vasiliymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The
Hello All,
On 19 October 2003, at 17:27:42 (GMT +0300) you wrote:
Please don't waste your time for answering on this topic, because I
already took the solution :)
--
Best regards,
Vasiliymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows XP 5.1 Build
Hello Plusnet,
On 19 October 2003, at 14:49:47 (GMT +0100) you wrote:
P Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly
P PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off
P using it. Thankyou
For more information (and details) you may visit www.pgpi.org
Hello Barry,
On 18 October 2003, at 17:26:19 (GMT +0100) you wrote:
BH Have I wasted my money? :((
99,9% *NO*.
The developers say that users have 30 experiences days for trying and
using of program and then they (users) buy this program they clearly
conceives what they buying.
--
Hallo Chris,
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:33:03 -0500GMT (19-10-03, 21:33 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CM I have often wondered about the default LDAP server entries that come
CM pre-configured in TB's address books window (Bigfoot, Infospace,
CM Switchboard, etc.). I don't use LDAP (right now) so
Hallo Vasiliy,
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:27:42 +0300GMT (19-10-03, 16:27 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
VE %IF:%AbTOEmail:TO='' %TO='%AbTOName %OFROMADDR':
Apart from the missing '%' before the first 'TO' I can't find anything
why it shouldn't work. However, you should consider the
rich gregory wrote:
I am very happily editing my subject lines (and the rest of the email, if called
for) with a filter/batch file combo as posted at:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html
Uh-huh I assume you mean the filter/batch file titled: 'Mssg
header editor' with a
Hi TB'rs,
I tried sending a plain-text email with no attachments to me dear 'ol
mum and it was bounced several (4) times. I then sent it from Opera's
M2 and it went through fine. Here is where the url in the failed
header took me:
SORBS:
http://www.dnsbl.us.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?jsIP=
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 1:58:59 PM, you wrote:
RW OK, I'm going to jump in here as I've never been the slightest bit
RW interested in PGP as John isn't and he has very much voiced my
RW thoughts on the matter. In fact I had (now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
On Oct 19, 2003, 16:09 +0100 ( 11:09 AM here), Marck D Pearlstone
[MDP] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MDP There is already a bug report on this in the BT.
I must have missed the original messages.
MDP The presence of an email address
NL I tried sending a plain-text email with no attachments
NL to me dear 'ol mum and it was bounced several (4) times.
NL I then sent it from Opera's M2 and it went through fine.
NL Here is where the url in the failed header took me:
TheBat! is blacklisted by more and more servers. I am well
Hi Roelof,
@19-Oct-2003, 23:19 +0200 (22:19 UK time) Roelof Otten [RO] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Vasiliy:
VE %IF:%AbTOEmail:TO='' %TO='%AbTOName %OFROMADDR':
RO Apart from the missing '%' before the first 'TO' I can't find
RO anything why it shouldn't work.
The new V2 template
Hello John,
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RW thoughts on the matter. In fact I had (now just removed) a filter to
RW ignore all PGP titled mails.
I removed my filter too, once a few nice people helped me off list.
Its neat that you can send an encrypted message and no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 4:53:06 PM, you wrote:
NL and of course:
NL X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.01) Personal
NL The only thing that changed between TB! and M2 was about 2
minutes...
NL and the change in clients.
You need to Hack
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 5:16:56 PM, you wrote:
E it will be necessary to
E leave TB! and use another mail program for most purposes. I
E don't like seeing that happen, but know no other way to
E reach all my subscribers.
see my instructions that I just sent to the list.
If
Hello John,
On Monday, October 20, 2003, 8:36:07 AM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 4:53:06 PM, you wrote:
Study the images below, and make the changes exactly like the
pictures show
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 6:09:06 PM, you wrote:
GW Many thanks from me too, John. But are there supposed to be two
GW pictures or one; those two lines are the same.
Oh... silly me,
there are supposed to be 2 pics
This is what
Hello ETM,
On 19 October 2003, at 18:16:56 (GMT -0400) you wrote:
E TheBat! is blacklisted by more and more servers.
And what reason of this blocking? As about me I never notice such
problem, all my mails was successfully delivered. If problems were then
that was from my provider
Hello Edgar,
On 19 October 2003, at 21:15:40 (GMT +0200) you wrote:
E Most people use OE. When I use the openPGP and sign messages
E (including nomime) TB! makes a message that is signed but as mime
E mail (if I'm correct). This can not be checked in OE.
Outlook Express don't support PGP/MIME
Hello Roelof,
On 19 October 2003, at 23:19:04 (GMT +0200) you wrote:
RO Apart from the missing '%' before the first 'TO' I can't find anything
RO why it shouldn't work.
No, in my template '%' are presents. That's I just accidentally deleted
'%' during pasting the string from clipboard into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 5:34:41 PM, you wrote:
RW Don't suppose you'd be willing to pass on that help would you?
I've
RW now downloaded and installed PGP 8.02 and it's very easily and
nicely
RW set up some keys for me but I'm a
Hello John,
on Sunday, 19. October 2003, at 17:36:07 [GMT -0500] you wrote:
It will say
Ritlabs! (v2.01) Personal
works fine, and X-Ray banned from the system.
--
Ciao
Thomas
Mailer: TheBat! 2.01
OS: Windows XP Service Pack 1
PGP:PGP 8.0 | Key: 0xABBB7287
HP:
Hello John,
On Monday, October 20, 2003, 9:14:20 AM, you wrote:
Oh... silly me,
there are supposed to be 2 pics
This is what the original will look like (although line numbers may
be
different as this was version 2)
http://legacy.sheltonbbs.com/~jmmorse/bat_hack2.gif
And this is what you
Hello All
What is the best version of PGP to download and install.
I think I'll give it a try
--
Best regards,
Barry
Using TB! v2.01 Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP1mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.01 | Using
Hello Gordon,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 1:01:13 AM, you wrote:
GW Hello John,
GW On Monday, October 20, 2003, 9:14:20 AM, you wrote:
Oh... silly me,
there are supposed to be 2 pics
This is what the original will look like (although line numbers may
be
different as this was version 2)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 7:05:45 PM, you wrote:
P What is the best version of PGP to download and install.
P I think I'll give it a try
I've just got the latest free version 7.0.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 7:10:11 PM, you wrote:
http://legacy.sheltonbbs.com/~jmmorse/bat_hack2.gif
And this is what you will change it too
http://legacy.sheltonbbs.com/~jmmorse/bat_hack.gif
GW Thanks again. In 2.01 it's at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello John,
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't be scared, now that you have your keys created, right click on
them and right click on your key manager and choose Add|Photo so we
will be able to see what you look like
Hi Gordon, thanks for finding that line i thought i was going mad.
And thanks for the tip John.
Now - can you go one step further? What about not using Ritlabs
at all - and what about removing that Educational, Personal,
and Business? My X-Mailer line now looks much more personal! ;)
/
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 3:14:20 PM, John wrote:
JM Oh... silly me,
JM there are supposed to be 2 pics
JM This is what the original will look like (although line numbers may
JM be
JM different as this was version 2)
JM http://legacy.sheltonbbs.com/~jmmorse/bat_hack2.gif
JM And this is what you
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 6:14:20 PM, you wrote:
This is what the original will look like (although line numbers may
be different as this was version 2)
http://legacy.sheltonbbs.com/~jmmorse/bat_hack2.gif
And this is what you will change it too
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 4:01:13 PM, Gordon wrote:
GW I haven't hacked a file like that since the days of CP/M and the
GW Kaypro!
That brings back the memories for sure! (most of which I would
probably like to forget)
--
Neal
Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 3
GW Thanks again. In 2.01 it's at line 00488380h I haven't
GW hacked a file like that since the days of CP/M and the
GW Kaypro!
JM I changed the pictures to match the latest version,
JM Here is also a topic on the board about it
JM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 8:00:02 PM, you wrote:
JM Question: Does it need to be hacked each time I install a new update?
Your welcome, yes, you will have to do it with each new version.
Maybe I can look into making a patch with
VE And what reason of this blocking?
The accusation is that it is the favored mail program of
spammers.
Elaine
Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 7:58:29 PM, you wrote:
NL I wonder if it would be possible for RitLabs! g to find a solution
NL to this dilema without hacking the exe. Thanks much.
That would be very nice if they made this editable...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 7:33:40 PM, you wrote:
RW And I've signed this one. Just had a look at your PGP key and imported
RW but I suppose I now need your private key. I'm getting there.
No, you don't need my private key, that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Richard,
Reading your E-mail I have added my photo to my key. Perhaps you
would be kind enough to verify, please
- --
Regards
Nigel
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.2
Comment: Public Key:
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 8:39:07 PM, you wrote:
JM Question: Does it need to be hacked each time I install a new update?
Your welcome, yes, you will have to do it with each new version.
Maybe I can look into making a patch with each version that can just
be run to automate the job.
Maybe
Sunday, October 19, 2003 at 6:50 PM (Pacific Time)
Hello John, This is a reply to your message dated
Sunday, October 19, 2003 at 3:36:07 PM, when you wrote:
JM You need to Hack the X-Mailer line in your copy of the_Bat! Here's
JM how: Open thebat.exe in UltraEdit http://www.ultraedit.com/ Study
kg I'm sorry, but to me that's like getting in my car, driving to the
kg airport, taking a plane to another city, landing, renting a car, driving
kg to a convenience store, purchasing a gallon of milk, driving back to the
kg airport, turning the rental car in, flying home, driving home from the
kg
JM For example only 5 people (who's keys I have) can read what I encrypted below:
JM - -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
JM Version: PGP 7.0.4
JM qANQR1DBwU4D/3jJIZ9Gz7kQB/0aCYYLtF67p8i/mHxpjmI6mPTuf2SwCQJ0mV+L
JM Ze5NZjQDQD78YSkXanR/ivmtNO3/5qMwJ2Dnf4/K22gGnygGOKUq6rPJrAQwkXWS
... snip, snip ...
JM
JM ... you need to upload your public key to a server, do this
JM by
JM clicking on Server|send to (just choose one of the servers, I picked
JM the first one)
Where do I find server | send to? The only PGP options (all under Tools) I see are:
Choose version
Key manager
Hi St,
Now - can you go one step further? What about not using Ritlabs
at all - and what about removing that Educational, Personal,
and Business? My X-Mailer line now looks much more personal! ;)
That's what I've done; I searched for the area in the executable that
has Business,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello The_Bat! Users,
I have made a patch that will change the X-Mailer Header for you.
It will change your x-mailer header from:
The Bat! (v2.01) Personal
to
Ritlabs! (v2.01) Personal
It is automatic, just download it, and follow the
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 5:53:48 PM, Jack wrote:
JM Maybe the nice folks at Ritlabs! will:
JM 1. Give us an easier/less time consuming/less dangerous(for klutzes
JM like me) way of doing it.
JM 2. Change it on *their* end.
Well, I would think this to be a VERY important issue to deal with.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 8:52:43 PM, you wrote:
NS Reading your E-mail I have added my photo to my key. Perhaps you
NS would be kind enough to verify, please
I couldn't get your key, it said unknown key
- --
Regards,
John
My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 9:51:06 PM, you wrote:
JM I can also make you a personalized patch, but you
JM must send me your message and it has to be 25 characters
JM in length (including spaces)
Actually I need to withdraw this
Hi Neal,
@19-Oct-2003, 19:28 -0800 (20-Oct 04:28 UK time) Neal Laugman said
to Jack:
JM 1. Give us an easier/less time consuming/less dangerous(for
JM klutzes like me) way of doing it.
JM 2. Change it on *their* end.
Well, I would think this to be a VERY important issue to deal
with.
Yes.
Peter-
PM Not if this key was signed with the old (expired) one... :-)
...thanks, I think...
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
On Sunday, October 19, 2003 at 11:54 (which was Sunday, October 19,
2003 at 20:54 where I am) Mark Wieder [MW] wrote:
MW This is very cool. I didn't realize I could display Cyrillic
MW characters without changing the language set.
I don't see any of them except in the subject, the firs message
82 matches
Mail list logo
