Re[2]: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Hi Allie Monday, December 29, 2003, 10:39:23 AM, you wrote: AM> I'm unable to help you since I don't really know what options/features AM> mean a lot to you. The best thing to do would be to look at what's AM> new here: AM> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/news_detail.php?ID=389 I did

Re[2]: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Monday, December 29, 2003, 11:06:13 AM, you wrote: WB> The best reason from now until January 10th is the price. WB> Thanks Wayne. I have to agree there. Cheers, -- Vishal Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.

Re: Shift+Ctrl+Alt+l : why should one have to use this?

Hello Peter, PO>>> Shift+Ctrl+Alt+l (or L): search for unlisted folders, why should PO>>> one have to use this? RO>> Only when you've somehow lost folders from your configuration, RO>> while they're still on disk. > The "what for" I know. The question was: why should one have to use > this? Typ

Re[2]: Shift+Ctrl+Alt+l : why should one have to use this?

Hello Roelof Otten, on Mon, 29 Dec 2003 06:29:43 +0100 (2003-12-29 06:29:43 in .nl) in the message with reference you [RO] wrote (at least in part): PO>> Shift+Ctrl+Alt+l (or L): search for unlisted folders, why should one PO>> have to use this? RO> Only when you've someh

Re: Revoking GnuPG key

Hi Edgar, @29-Dec-2003, 23:44 +0100 (29-Dec 22:44 UK time) Edgar [E] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to All: E> How should I've done it (if I did it wrong) Just as you have. TB's GnuPG support has just been fixed in the latest beta. ,--/ From the release notes for \-- [-] When signing wi

Revoking GnuPG key

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, I'm using GnuPG for signing my mails. My Public and private key will expire within a couple of days. I've created a new key and signed it with the old one, then I revoked the old key. But when I want to sign a message TB! comes still up w

Re: Re-send doesn't store when re-sent

Hello Thomas, Sunday, December 28, 2003, 10:04:34 PM, you wrote: >> The Bat is very best at representing a lot of details from all the >> delivery process. So it's easy to second-check if mail was from a >> spammer, or a commercial source, or your friend. The received mail >> has full informatio

Re: complex search question

Hello Stefan, Sunday, December 28, 2003, 2:27:57 PM, you wrote: ST>>> Basically, you should search for earthlink.net+dogs in sender and ST>>> subject :-) ST> Well, it's described in the Help, actually ;-) Ah, the TB 2.xx has improved Help in this area! A>> How does this work? ST> Here is a f

Re: complex search question

On Sunday, December 28, 2003, Stefan Tanurkov wrote... JA>> Does this change include a search that actually tells you what JA>> it's doing on IMAP? > IMAP support is a separate entity, so waiting for IMAP search > results (which is actually displayed as a state of IMAP connection > already) will

Re: Repopulating IMAP folder

On Saturday, December 27, 2003, Matt Henkel wrote... > The other day I ran into a problem: All IMAP folders that The Bat! > was subscribed to were deleted from the server. I'm not positive > that it was an error with The Bat! (although there really isn't any > other explanation) but I want to repo

Re: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Monday, December 29, 2003 at 8:04 AM (Pacific Time) Hello Vishal, This is a reply to your message dated Monday, December 29, 2003 at 6:34:56 AM, when you wrote: VN> I'm considering upgrading to the xmas edition, but remember many VN> posts recently on how all the folder columns were messed up unt

Re: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Vishal Nakra wrote: VN> I'm considering upgrading to the xmas edition, but remember many VN> posts recently on how all the folder columns were messed up until VN> you figured out how to use views. Are people upgrading despite VN> that? Put another way, are there any compelling reasons to VN> upgra

Re: Re-send doesn't store when re-sent

Hello Adam, > For mail that was sent, the salient dated information is the date and > time the mail was sent. If I look up under a date, I can't find when a > message was sent. ,- [ From RFC 2822 - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html ] | 3.6.1. The origination date field | |The origina

Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Hi, I'm considering upgrading to the xmas edition, but remember many posts recently on how all the folder columns were messed up until you figured out how to use views. Are people upgrading despite that? Put another way, are there any compelling reasons to upgrade? Cheers, -- Vishal

Re[2]: Meaning of QT

Hello Maurice, Sunday, December 28, 2003, 12:38:36 PM, you wrote: MM> Hello Jean, MM> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:09:31 +0100 GMT MM> (28.12.2003, 11:09 +0200 GMT, where I live), MM> you wrote: JS>> I have read in a message : Using QTs What is the meaning JS>> of QT ? MM> Quick templates - check ou