Re[2]: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread jwayne
On Monday, May 10, 2004, 9:10:44 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: (snip) J Thanks. BTW, I only found the Gmane link via Google. (snip) MDP Damn! That's being sent out by the list server and it thinks it's MDP sending HTML instead of plain text. I shall have to go a-mending. Oh, and one more

Re: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jwayne, @10-May-2004, 09:17 -0400 (10-May 14:17 UK time) jwayne [J] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: J Thanks. BTW, I only found the Gmane link via Google. MDP Damn! That's being sent out by the list server and it thinks MDP it's sending HTML instead of plain text. I shall have to

Re[2]: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread jwayne
On Monday, May 10, 2004, 9:35:45 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP Dear Jwayne, MDP @10-May-2004, 09:17 -0400 (10-May 14:17 UK time) jwayne [J] in MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: J Thanks. BTW, I only found the Gmane link via Google. MDP Damn! That's being sent out by the list server

Re: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jwayne, @10-May-2004, 10:09 -0400 (10-May 15:09 UK time) jwayne [J] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: J Oh, and one more thing. The Gmane links on J http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html are J incorrect. They should be be prefixed with news://, not J nntp://. MDP I don't

Re: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Monday, May 10, 2004, Marck D Pearlstone wrote... where news:// is clearly the preferred way to specify an *article*, but nntp:// refers to a group - which is what we're doing! I will change the references since OE is broken, but I don't think it's right to do so. Or, point the users to

Re: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jonathan, @10-May-2004, 09:33 -0500 (10-May 15:33 UK time) Jonathan Angliss [JA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: ... snip JA the instructions ;) Which... also specifies nntp:// So once JA again, OE breaks stuff ;) ... which I had forgotten and put changes to our references out of

Re[2]: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread jwayne
On Monday, May 10, 2004, 10:47:46 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP Dear Jonathan, MDP @10-May-2004, 09:33 -0500 (10-May 15:33 UK time) Jonathan Angliss MDP [JA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP ... JA the instructions ;) Which... also specifies nntp:// So once JA again, OE breaks

Re: Challenge / reponse systems

2004-05-10 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Saturday, May 8, 2004, 3:23:42 PM, Melissa Reese wrote: M You recently sent a message to [user's name snipped] M [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject [message subject M snipped]. To help cope with the ever increasing volume of junk M e-mails, I am using RiskFreeMail which has placed your message

Re: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread MAU
Hello Marck, where news:// is clearly the preferred way to specify an *article*, but nntp:// refers to a group - which is what we're doing! I will change the references since OE is broken, but I don't think it's right to do so. Why don't you just put both and... everybody happy! :) -- Best

Re: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Miguel, @10-May-2004, 18:43 +0200 (10-May 17:43 UK time) MAU [MAU] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: where news:// is clearly the preferred way to specify an *article*, but nntp:// refers to a group - which is what we're doing! I will change the references since OE is broken, but I

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Mark As Junk/Not Junk - keyboard shortcut/toolbar button?)

2004-05-10 Thread Raymund Tump
Dear Marck! Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line. Oh, next time I read first, before answering :-) I thought I should add a valid cut mark. As far as I'm concerned no cut mark is a valid cut mark :-)

Re[2]: Mod: Cut mark (was: Mark As Junk/Not Junk - keyboard shortcut/toolbar button?)

2004-05-10 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Raymund, On Mon, 10 May 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RT Oh, next time I read first, before answering :-) I thought I should add a RT valid cut mark. As far as I'm concerned no cut mark is a valid cut mark :-) Nearly right but it should be before your personal signature and not

What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread jwayne
Last posting in the tbudl archives is over 2 weeks old. Has the archiving been abandoned? (I hope not, because I only resubscribed to ask this question!) jon -- Jonathan Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL'

Re: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jwayne, @10-May-2004, 06:52 -0400 (10-May 11:52 UK time) jwayne [J] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: J Last posting in the tbudl archives is over 2 weeks old. Has J the archiving been abandoned? (I hope not, because I only J resubscribed to ask this question!) We're still sending to the

SETI@home plugin for The Bat?

2004-05-10 Thread Thomas Andersson
Hi list! I've been using The Bat! for some time now and I love it. Especially the ability of using macros to create mail signatures. Does anyone know of a macro that I can use to insert my progress for [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my mail signature? Cheers! -- Thomas Andersson - Sweden Email: [EMAIL

Re[2]: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread jwayne
On Monday, May 10, 2004, 6:58:56 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP Dear Jwayne, MDP @10-May-2004, 06:52 -0400 (10-May 11:52 UK time) jwayne [J] in MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: J Last posting in the tbudl archives is over 2 weeks old. Has J the archiving been abandoned? (I hope not, because

Re: What's with the TB archives?

2004-05-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jwayne, @10-May-2004, 09:07 -0400 (10-May 14:07 UK time) jwayne [J] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: J Last posting in the tbudl archives is over 2 weeks old. Has J the archiving been abandoned? (I hope not, because I only J resubscribed to ask this question!) MDP We're still