Re: Bat! taking 100% resources

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi Allie, On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, at 22:53:50 [GMT-0500] (which was Wed, 13:53:50 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Have you checked your temp folders for temp file overload? Where are these located? Do you mean the normal Windoze type Temp folders, or is there somewhere special in Bat!?

Re: Bat! taking 100% resources

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi All, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, at 19:34:02 [GMT+1000] (which was 19:34:02 Australian Eastern Time) I wrote: Correction, just did a File Find, millions of the pesky little things, literally speaking of course. 65,771 actually! Presuming they can be safely deleted! Here goes, anyway! Help!

Re: Bat! taking 100% resources

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi All On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, at 19:58:34 [GMT+1000] (which was 19:58:34 Australian Eastern Time) I wrote: Can some kind person run me through an automated way to get rid of the files? (Highly technically challenged at times, looks like the ability to write a batch file is missing in

superfluous temp files (was: Re: Bat! taking 100% resources)

2004-07-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:25:14 +1000GMT (21-7-2004, 12:25 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JP Still interested why so many created, and if this improves performance. TB creates temp files when downloading messages on extracting attached files and probably on some more occasions. These

Re: Sorting Office Filters

2004-07-21 Thread Simon Elliott
On Monday, July 19, 2004, 3:38:17 PM, Thomas wrote: SE Any thoughts? TF Time for an update? Might be a good idea. I'll look into this. -- Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using

Re: superfluous temp files (was: Re: Bat! taking 100% resources)

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi Roelof, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, at 13:01:23 [GMT+0200] (which was 21:01:23 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: In other words lots of temp files from TB is symptomatic for a range of problems, but the symptoms cause their own problem. Now you've deleted all of them, just check whether there

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi rich, On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, at 21:25:03 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:25 PM where I live) you wrote: rg A smileys web site??? I missed something! BTW, How Are They Viewed rg By Non Bat Mail Programs? Yep... See below: Below are the instructions to get smileys working properly on your system.

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Bill, On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, at 19:17:15 [GMT -0700] (which was 8:17 PM where I live) you wrote: BM I think that the version of the Bat! must be at least 2.12, since BM these directions do not work for the 2.11 version that I have BM installed. In particular, ctl-alt-shft-T brings up some sort

Re: superfluous temp files (was: Re: Bat! taking 100% resources)

2004-07-21 Thread Allie Martin
John Phillips, [JP] wrote: Thanks for the explanation! If you wish to automate regular emptying of your temp folders, take a look at this freeware solution: http://www.danish-shareware.dk/soft/emptemp/index.html -- -=[ Allie Martin ]=- List Moderator and fellow end-user PGPKeys:

Re: junk mail folder doesn't count

2004-07-21 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jan, @21-Jul-2004, 08:30 -0400 (21-Jul 13:30 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: For many days I have been experimenting: setting my junk mail folder to limit # of msgs. It doesn't seem to be working here. Can anyone else confirm? Not really. Remember, these limits don't get used

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Leif, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 05:54:06 -0600GMT (21-7-2004, 13:54 +0200, where I live), you wrote: LG Well, closing and restarting TB will do it too, but do you really want LG to do that each time you get new smileys? It's not as if we're getting that many new smileys and rogues, is it?

Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Darrin Rich
Hello, I created an account at the Roguemoticons site and my image is up there. Downloaded the most recent rougue.zip and extracted all the files to their proper location. So If I understand correctly, I should just place my handle which is :Darrin_Rich: without the in my signature and it should

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Edvinas Matiuaitis
Hello Russell, On Tuesday, July 20, 2004, at 21:56 Lithuanian Time, you wrote: RLF This is probably a really stupid question, but if I use a smiley RLF such as :grin: and it is sent to someone who uses Outlook, will they RLF see the smiley or word grin surrounded by colons. I use TheBat! and I

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Darrin, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 06:24:50 -0700GMT (21-7-2004, 15:24 +0200, where I live), you wrote: DR I created an account at the Roguemoticons site and my image is up DR there. Downloaded the most recent rougue.zip and extracted all the DR files to their proper location. So If I understand

Access Violation Error at Startup

2004-07-21 Thread Rick Friedman
Sometimes, when starting up TB, I an error message displays indicating that an access violation occurred. A couple of times, instead of the access violation error, I get a Privileged Instruction message. I seem to be able to close these error messages and continue using TB! However, I'm wondering

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Edvinas, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:34:06 +0200GMT (21-7-2004, 15:34 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RLF This is probably a really stupid question, but if I use a smiley RLF such as :grin: and it is sent to someone who uses Outlook, will they EM I use TheBat! and I don't see any smilies

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Rick Friedman
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 9:24:50 AM, Darrin wrote: DR Hello, DR I created an account at the Roguemoticons site and my image is up DR there. Downloaded the most recent rougue.zip and extracted all the DR files to their proper location. So If I understand correctly, I should DR just place my

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Edvinas Matiuaitis
Hello Roelof, On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, at 15:50, you wrote: RO You're either using the plain text viewer or the RTV viewer without RO smioleys enabled or you didn't download the PCWSmileys from: RO http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php True I did not download them. -- Edvinas Using

test

2004-07-21 Thread Alexandr Gert
Hello, TBBETA. test -- Best regards, Alexandr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://del-3.web.ur.ru) Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Roelof, Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 7:15:57 AM, you wrote: Roelof It's not as if we're getting that many new smileys and rogues, Roelof is it? Starting TB once everyday would do it quite nicely, Roelof don't you think? Just ask Mary, she gets a few submissions for PCWSmileys nearly every

Re[2]: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Maggie
Hello Leif, On Wednesday Wednesday, July 21, 2004 at 7:21:16 AM you wrote: LG Hello Roelof, LG Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 7:15:57 AM, you wrote: Roelof It's not as if we're getting that many new smileys and rogues, Roelof is it? Starting TB once everyday would do it quite nicely, Roelof don't

Re[2]: Latinized and Cyrillized Japanese WAS--Re: About your Hoya

2004-07-21 Thread Maggie
Hello Cyrille, On Tuesday Tuesday, July 20, 2004 at 10:06:42 PM you wrote: Which is the 'best' character set to use on a regular basis C Use Latin-9 (ISO-8859-15) for the moment. It has the best coverage of C West European characters (Euro symbol ¤, French ½, and others). Thanks, Cyrille!

Re: OLE Objects, Exchange Server and TB!

2004-07-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jurgen, On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:18:06 +0200 GMT (21/07/2004, 02:18 +0700 GMT), Jurgen Haug wrote: The difference in size is funny. Either he sent the Excel file with it or not. My first guess is that the message linked to a file on your company LAN, so that OL downloaded it from there

RE:OLE Objects, Exchange Server and TB!

2004-07-21 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Thomas, Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 5:59:07 PM, you wrote: How big is the message on the server? I am really surprised that two email clients show different size for the same message. JH Do you have OUtlook? No. Lucky you ;-) JH I pulled the message via dd out into Explorer and

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Eric
I replied to you: E Dear Lief, E You said LG Below are the instructions to get smileys LG working properly on your LG system. E Many thanks. I'll have a go tomorrow. Which I did. As a result I can see the rouges' pictures, but not the smileys :-( Clearly I did something wrong. Any

Re: OLE Objects, Exchange Server and TB!

2004-07-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jurgen, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:16:29 +0200 GMT (21/07/2004, 23:16 +0700 GMT), Jurgen Haug wrote: JH I pulled the message via dd out into Explorer and zipped it, JH maybe that could help, too? You can send to me by PM. I'll have a look-see. JH will do so, Sir. Received. The unzipped

Folder size limit not working ?

2004-07-21 Thread Tim Musson
TBUDL, I can't seem to get the folder settings that keep a folder size in line to work any more... Folder properties: Maximum number of stored messages is 8000 Keep messages in the base for (days): 90 Folder Maintenance Center: Un-select all but the one folder (TBBETA) Select Purge

RE:OLE Objects, Exchange Server and TB!

2004-07-21 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Thomas, Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 6:28:21 PM, you wrote: Received. The unzipped message is some 80K big, but TB's source view shows - nothing. Please send it to the developers, as in the text editor, it shows there is something which I cannot decode. okay. JH And today I found

Re: Help - multiple inbox folders in one account!

2004-07-21 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Tim, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v2.11.02) Personal' was used to write mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Saturday, July 10, 2004 at 7:54:45 PM. TM The wife's TB (2.11.02) has 5 inbox folders! Also an Outbox, TM Sent, and Trash... Only one set (I marked them with a * on the TM end) have the glyphs

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

2004-07-21 Thread Jack
Hello, J My only concern is that if I send a message to a customer, they J will be able to see my personal email in the header. I want this to J be hidden so that all correspondence goes to the sites address. Is J there a way to accomplish this or should I just stick with using J webmail? RO

Re: Bat! taking 100% resources

2004-07-21 Thread AceMan
John Phillips said: That's strange. I have used Mozilla and PC-Cillin for over a year and a half and have *never* experienced *any* of the issues you describe. I am also using BayesIt too, but still no recreation of your issues. http://tinyurl.com/4cmwq Oh I see, you're using PC-Cillin

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

2004-07-21 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello Jack, On 21 Jul 2004 at 13:46:04 -0400 GMT [19:46 CEST] you wrote: J I J don't want my personal information showing up in the header of the J mails I send out. If you just want to change the from address you can do that with the %from macro. -- Cheers, Andre If everything seems under

Re[3]: K9 Filtering Help

2004-07-21 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Darrin, Monday, July 19, 2004, 10:50:41 PM, Darrin wrotened: Darrin Hi, Darrin On 7/19/2004 2:49 PM my time, Paul wrote: PC when you select a filter, you can specify fields to search on. These PC include receiptient, sender, subject, text and kludges. Kludges are the PC headers. When you

Re: superfluous temp files (was: Re: Bat! taking 100% resources)

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi Allie, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, at 07:41:24 [GMT-0500] (which was 22:41:24 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: If you wish to automate regular emptying of your temp folders, take a look at this freeware solution: http://www.danish-shareware.dk/soft/emptemp/index.html Thanks for the URL.

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

2004-07-21 Thread Jack
Hello, J I don't want my personal information showing up in the header of J the mails I send out. AW If you just want to change the from address you can do that with the AW %from macro. I don't know enough about the header structure to know if that is all that's needed. Thus my concern. I

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 9:24 AM, you wrote: DR files to their proper location. So If I understand correctly, I should DR just place my handle which is :Darrin_Rich: without the in my signature and it DR should work? yes it should! DR I can see many other users photos in my tbudl emails.

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

2004-07-21 Thread Dan Grunberg
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:35:32 -0400 (3:35 PM EDT here) Jack wrote: Hello, J I don't want my personal information showing up in the header of J the mails I send out. AW If you just want to change the from address you can do that with AW the %from macro. I don't know enough about the header

Re: Folder size limit not working ?

2004-07-21 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Roelof, My MUA believes '(X-Mailer not set)' was used to write mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 at 5:59:41 PM. I wish I knew what was going on. I sure can't explain it. RO The only thing that might cause problems would be the amount of RO free space both on the drive with

Re[2]: Folder size limit not working ?

2004-07-21 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy rich, Thursday, July 22, 2004, 12:00:08 AM, rich wrotened: TM I can't seem to get the folder settings that keep a folder size in TM line to work any more... rich ... snip ... TM The folder has 9,466 message before and after running the purge! TM I just upgraded to 2.12 from 2.11.02, and

AV During Normal Operation

2004-07-21 Thread Bill McCarthy
Hello TB User Discussion List and RITLABS, I'm getting a The Bat! error box with the following message: Access violation at address 77F5B2AB in module 'ntdll.dll'. Read of address 0024. after this occurs, TB! either (1) generates a Grid index out of range message or (2) shows nothing in the

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Darrin Rich
Hi, On 7/21/2004 6:46 AM my time, Roelof wrote: RO I'd prefer everybody placing their roguemoticon in RO the X-Rogue: header and not in the signature, since the latter won't RO show when you're using the plain text viewer. Thanks very much Roelof! I did the steps you described and I think it

Re: K9 Filtering Help

2004-07-21 Thread Darrin Rich
Hi, On 7/21/2004 11:19 AM my time, Ben wrote: BA Or you can press F9 and get it in a whole new window then press F9 BA to get back to what you were doing. Thats a handy thing to know. Thank :) -- Darrin Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Darrin Rich
Hi, On 7/21/2004 6:54 AM my time, Rick wrote: RF I'd prefer everybody placing their roguemoticon in RF the X-Rogue: header and not in the signature, since the latter won't RF show when you're using the plain text viewer. Im sending this message to see if it works. -- Darrin WinXP Home Service

bad IMAP bug

2004-07-21 Thread Roman Katzer
Hi Batters, in 2.12 I found a bad IMAP bug. I synchronized folders on one IMAP account and saw one new message in the Inbox folder of that account. When I clicked on the new message in the message list, the preview pane showed a different message (different sender, date, subject etc) from the

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

2004-07-21 Thread Jack
Hello, I don't know enough about the header structure to know if that is all that's needed. Thus my concern. I seem to recall reading on here that that field is mainly for display purposes but I could be remembering wrong. DG Why not send a test message and see what happens. I did and it

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Rick Friedman
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 9:09:52 PM, Darrin wrote: DR Hi, DR On 7/21/2004 6:54 AM my time, Rick wrote: RF I'd prefer everybody placing their roguemoticon in RF the X-Rogue: header and not in the signature, since the latter won't RF show when you're using the plain text viewer. DR Im sending