Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Rick Friedman
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 9:09:52 PM, Darrin wrote: DR> Hi, DR> On 7/21/2004 6:54 AM my time, Rick wrote: RF>> I'd prefer everybody placing their roguemoticon in RF>> the X-Rogue: header and not in the signature, since the latter won't RF>> show when you're using the plain text viewer. DR> Im

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

2004-07-21 Thread Jack
Hello, >> I don't know enough about the header structure to know if that is >> all that's needed. Thus my concern. I seem to recall reading on >> here that that field is mainly for display purposes but I could be >> remembering wrong. DG> Why not send a test message and see what happens. I did

bad IMAP bug

2004-07-21 Thread Roman Katzer
Hi Batters, in 2.12 I found a bad IMAP bug. I synchronized folders on one IMAP account and saw one new message in the Inbox folder of that account. When I clicked on the new message in the message list, the preview pane showed a different message (different sender, date, subject etc) from the Inbo

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Darrin Rich
Hi, On 7/21/2004 6:54 AM my time, Rick wrote: RF> I'd prefer everybody placing their roguemoticon in RF> the X-Rogue: header and not in the signature, since the latter won't RF> show when you're using the plain text viewer. Im sending this message to see if it works. -- Darrin WinXP Home Servi

Re: K9 Filtering Help

2004-07-21 Thread Darrin Rich
Hi, On 7/21/2004 11:19 AM my time, Ben wrote: BA> Or you can press F9 and get it in a whole new window then press F9 BA> to get back to what you were doing. Thats a handy thing to know. Thank :) -- Darrin Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Darrin Rich
Hi, On 7/21/2004 6:46 AM my time, Roelof wrote: RO> I'd prefer everybody placing their roguemoticon in RO> the X-Rogue: header and not in the signature, since the latter won't RO> show when you're using the plain text viewer. Thanks very much Roelof! I did the steps you described and I think

AV During Normal Operation

2004-07-21 Thread Bill McCarthy
Hello TB User Discussion List and RITLABS, I'm getting a The Bat! error box with the following message: Access violation at address 77F5B2AB in module 'ntdll.dll'. Read of address 0024. after this occurs, TB! either (1) generates a "Grid index out of range" message or (2) shows nothing in th

Re[2]: Folder size limit not working ?

2004-07-21 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy rich, Thursday, July 22, 2004, 12:00:08 AM, rich wrotened: TM>> I can't seem to get the folder settings that keep a folder size in TM>> line to work any more... rich> < ... snip ...> TM>> The folder has 9,466 message before and after running the purge! TM>> I just upgraded to 2.12 from 2.11

Re: Folder size limit not working ?

2004-07-21 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Roelof, My MUA believes '(X-Mailer not set)' was used to write mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 at 5:59:41 PM. I wish I knew what was going on. I sure can't explain it. RO> The only thing that might cause problems would be the amount of RO> free space both on the drive with

Re: Folder size limit not working ?

2004-07-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tim, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:30:40 -0400GMT (21-7-2004, 18:30 +0200, where I live), you wrote: TM> I can't seem to get the folder settings that keep a folder size in TM> line to work any more... I tried it especially for you on my tbot folder, that kept messages for 30 days. TM> Folder pro

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

2004-07-21 Thread Dan Grunberg
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:35:32 -0400 (3:35 PM EDT here) Jack wrote: > Hello, J>>> I don't want my personal information showing up in the header of J>>> the mails I send out. AW>> If you just want to change the from address you can do that with AW>> the %from macro. > I don't know enough about the he

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 9:24 AM, you wrote: DR> files to their proper location. So If I understand correctly, I should DR> just place my handle which is ":Darrin_Rich:" without the "" in my signature and it DR> should work? yes it should! DR> I can see many other users photos in my tbudl em

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

2004-07-21 Thread Jack
Hello, J>> I don't want my personal information showing up in the header of J>> the mails I send out. AW> If you just want to change the from address you can do that with the AW> %from macro. I don't know enough about the header structure to know if that is all that's needed. Thus my concern.

Re: superfluous temp files (was: Re: Bat! taking 100% resources)

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi Allie, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, at 07:41:24 [GMT-0500] (which was 22:41:24 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > If you wish to automate regular emptying of your temp folders, take a > look at this freeware solution: > http://www.danish-shareware.dk/soft/emptemp/index.html Thanks for the URL

Re[3]: K9 Filtering Help

2004-07-21 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Darrin, Monday, July 19, 2004, 10:50:41 PM, Darrin wrotened: Darrin> Hi, Darrin> On 7/19/2004 2:49 PM my time, Paul wrote: PC>> when you select a filter, you can specify fields to search on. These PC>> include receiptient, sender, subject, text and kludges. Kludges are the PC>> headers. Whe

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

2004-07-21 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello Jack, On 21 Jul 2004 at 13:46:04 -0400 GMT [19:46 CEST] you wrote: J> I J> don't want my personal information showing up in the header of the J> mails I send out. If you just want to change the from address you can do that with the %from macro. -- Cheers, Andre "If everything seems un

Re: Bat! taking 100% resources

2004-07-21 Thread AceMan
John Phillips said: >> That's strange. I have used Mozilla and PC-Cillin for over a year and a >> half and have *never* experienced *any* of the issues you describe. I am >> also using BayesIt too, but still no recreation of your issues. > > > > http://tinyurl.com/4cmwq > Oh I see, you're using P

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

2004-07-21 Thread Jack
Hello, J>> My only concern is that if I send a message to a customer, they J>> will be able to see my personal email in the header. I want this to J>> be hidden so that all correspondence goes to the sites address. Is J>> there a way to accomplish this or should I just stick with using J>> webmail

Re: Help - multiple inbox folders in one account!

2004-07-21 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Tim, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v2.11.02) Personal' was used to write mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Saturday, July 10, 2004 at 7:54:45 PM. TM> The wife's TB (2.11.02) has 5 "inbox" folders! Also an Outbox, TM> Sent, and Trash... Only one set (I marked them with a * on the TM> end) have the glyphs

RE:OLE Objects, Exchange Server and TB!

2004-07-21 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Thomas, Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 6:28:21 PM, you wrote: > Received. The unzipped message is some 80K big, but TB's source view > shows - nothing. Please send it to the developers, as in the text > editor, it shows there is something which I cannot decode. okay. JH>> And today I found

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread molescroft
Dear Lief, Ignore my last message - I've realised that I needed to tick the smileys option in the middle of Options|Preferences|Viewer/Editor. (I think I'd used smileys a while ago, but then decided they were too obtrusive and turned the option off.) -- Eric Using TB! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5

Folder size limit not working ?

2004-07-21 Thread Tim Musson
TBUDL, I can't seem to get the folder settings that keep a folder size in line to work any more... Folder properties: Maximum number of stored messages is 8000 Keep messages in the base for (days): 90 Folder Maintenance Center: Un-select all but the one folder (TBBETA) Select Purge old/ex

Re: OLE Objects, Exchange Server and TB!

2004-07-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jurgen, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:16:29 +0200 GMT (21/07/2004, 23:16 +0700 GMT), Jurgen Haug wrote: JH>>> I pulled the message via d&d out into Explorer and zipped it, JH>>> maybe that could help, too? >> You can send to me by PM. I'll have a look-see. JH> will do so, Sir. Received. The unz

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Eric
I replied to you: E> Dear Lief, E> You said LG>> Below are the instructions to get smileys LG>> working properly on your LG>> system. E> Many thanks. I'll have a go tomorrow. Which I did. As a result I can see the rouges' pictures, but not the smileys :-( Clearly I did something wrong. Any s

RE:OLE Objects, Exchange Server and TB!

2004-07-21 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Thomas, Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 5:59:07 PM, you wrote: > How big is the message on the server? I am really surprised that two > email clients show different size for the same message. JH>> Do you have OUtlook? > No. Lucky you ;-) JH>> I pulled the message via d&d out into Explorer a

Re: 2 TB! entries in Add/Remove programs list

2004-07-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Christopher, On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:30:38 -0700 GMT (21/07/2004, 01:30 +0700 GMT), Christopher Brown wrote: CB> I was in the process of uninstalling a program, and I noticed CB> that there are 2 entries in my "installed programs" list for The CB> Bat!. The first uses the TB icon, and the se

Re: OLE Objects, Exchange Server and TB!

2004-07-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jurgen, On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:18:06 +0200 GMT (21/07/2004, 02:18 +0700 GMT), Jurgen Haug wrote: >> The difference in size is funny. Either he sent the Excel file with it >> or not. My first guess is that the message linked to a file on your >> company LAN, so that OL downloaded it from the

Re[2]: Latinized and Cyrillized Japanese WAS--Re: About your Hoya

2004-07-21 Thread Maggie
Hello Cyrille, On Tuesday Tuesday, July 20, 2004 at 10:06:42 PM you wrote: >> Which is the 'best' character set to use on a regular basis C> Use Latin-9 (ISO-8859-15) for the moment. It has the best coverage of C> West European characters (Euro symbol ¤, French ½, and others). Thanks, Cyrille

Re[2]: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Maggie
Hello Leif, On Wednesday Wednesday, July 21, 2004 at 7:21:16 AM you wrote: LG> Hello Roelof, LG> Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 7:15:57 AM, you wrote: Roelof>> It's not as if we're getting that many new smileys and rogues, Roelof>> is it? Starting TB once everyday would do it quite nicely, Roelof>> d

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Roelof, Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 7:15:57 AM, you wrote: Roelof> It's not as if we're getting that many new smileys and rogues, Roelof> is it? Starting TB once everyday would do it quite nicely, Roelof> don't you think? Just ask Mary, she gets a few submissions for PCWSmileys nearly every d

test

2004-07-21 Thread Alexandr Gert
Hello, TBBETA. test -- Best regards, Alexandr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://del-3.web.ur.ru) Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Edvinas Matiušaitis
Hello Roelof, On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, at 15:50, you wrote: RO> You're either using the plain text viewer or the RTV viewer without RO> smioleys enabled or you didn't download the PCWSmileys from: RO> http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php True I did not download them. -- Edvinas Using

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Rick Friedman
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 9:24:50 AM, Darrin wrote: DR> Hello, DR> I created an account at the Roguemoticons site and my image is up DR> there. Downloaded the most recent rougue.zip and extracted all the DR> files to their proper location. So If I understand correctly, I should DR> just place my

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Edvinas, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:34:06 +0200GMT (21-7-2004, 15:34 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RLF>> This is probably a really stupid question, but if I use a smiley RLF>> such as :grin: and it is sent to someone who uses Outlook, will they EM> I use TheBat! and I don't see any smilies

Access Violation Error at Startup

2004-07-21 Thread Rick Friedman
Sometimes, when starting up TB, I an error message displays indicating that an access violation occurred. A couple of times, instead of the access violation error, I get a "Privileged Instruction" message. I seem to be able to close these error messages and continue using TB! However, I'm wonderin

Re: Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Darrin, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 06:24:50 -0700GMT (21-7-2004, 15:24 +0200, where I live), you wrote: DR> I created an account at the Roguemoticons site and my image is up DR> there. Downloaded the most recent rougue.zip and extracted all the DR> files to their proper location. So If I understan

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Edvinas Matiušaitis
Hello Russell, On Tuesday, July 20, 2004, at 21:56 Lithuanian Time, you wrote: RLF> This is probably a really stupid question, but if I use a smiley RLF> such as :grin: and it is sent to someone who uses Outlook, will they RLF> see the smiley or word "grin" surrounded by colons. I use TheBat! an

Roguemoticons Help

2004-07-21 Thread Darrin Rich
Hello, I created an account at the Roguemoticons site and my image is up there. Downloaded the most recent rougue.zip and extracted all the files to their proper location. So If I understand correctly, I should just place my handle which is ":Darrin_Rich:" without the "" in my signature and it shou

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Leif, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 05:54:06 -0600GMT (21-7-2004, 13:54 +0200, where I live), you wrote: LG> Well, closing and restarting TB will do it too, but do you really want LG> to do that each time you get new smileys? It's not as if we're getting that many new smileys and rogues, is it? Star

Re: junk mail folder doesn't count

2004-07-21 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jan, @21-Jul-2004, 08:30 -0400 (21-Jul 13:30 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > For many days I have been experimenting: setting my junk mail > folder to limit # of msgs. It doesn't seem to be working here. > Can anyone else confirm? Not really. Remember, these limits don't get used

Re: superfluous temp files (was: Re: Bat! taking 100% resources)

2004-07-21 Thread Allie Martin
John Phillips, [JP] wrote: > Thanks for the explanation! If you wish to automate regular emptying of your temp folders, take a look at this freeware solution: http://www.danish-shareware.dk/soft/emptemp/index.html -- -=[ Allie Martin ]=- List Moderator and fellow end-user PGPKeys: http://key.a

junk mail folder doesn't count

2004-07-21 Thread jan . rifkinson
Battyfolks, For many days I have been experimenting: setting my junk mail folder to limit # of msgs. It doesn't seem to be working here. Can anyone else confirm? TIA -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V2.12.00/W2K_SP4 ICQ 41116329

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi Bill, On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, at 19:17:15 [GMT -0700] (which was 8:17 PM where I live) you wrote: BM> I think that the version of the Bat! must be at least 2.12, since BM> these directions do not work for the 2.11 version that I have BM> installed. In particular, ctl-alt-shft-T brings up some sort

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

2004-07-21 Thread Leif Gregory
Hi rich, On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, at 21:25:03 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:25 PM where I live) you wrote: rg> A smileys web site??? I missed something! BTW, How Are They Viewed rg> By Non Bat Mail Programs? Yep... See below: Below are the instructions to get smileys working properly on your system. Ass

Re: superfluous temp files (was: Re: Bat! taking 100% resources)

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi Roelof, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, at 13:01:23 [GMT+0200] (which was 21:01:23 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > In other words lots of temp files from TB is symptomatic for a range > of problems, but the symptoms cause their own problem. Now you've > deleted all of them, just check whether the

Re: Sorting Office Filters

2004-07-21 Thread Simon Elliott
On Monday, July 19, 2004, 3:38:17 PM, Thomas wrote: SE>> Any thoughts? TF> Time for an update? Might be a good idea. I'll look into this. -- Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Usin

superfluous temp files (was: Re: Bat! taking 100% resources)

2004-07-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:25:14 +1000GMT (21-7-2004, 12:25 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JP> Still interested why so many created, and if this improves performance. TB creates temp files when downloading messages on extracting attached files and probably on some more occasions. These

Re: Bat! taking 100% resources

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi All On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, at 19:58:34 [GMT+1000] (which was 19:58:34 Australian Eastern Time) I wrote: > Can some kind person run me through an automated way to get rid of the > files? (Highly technically challenged at times, looks like the ability to > write a batch file is missing in XP?

Re: Bat! taking 100% resources

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi All, On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, at 19:34:02 [GMT+1000] (which was 19:34:02 Australian Eastern Time) I wrote: > Correction, just did a File Find, millions of the pesky little things, > literally speaking of course. 65,771 actually! > Presuming they can be safely deleted! Here goes, anyway! Help

Re: Bat! taking 100% resources

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi Allie, On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, at 22:53:50 [GMT-0500] (which was Wed, 13:53:50 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > Have you checked your temp folders for temp file overload? Where are these located? Do you mean the normal Windoze type Temp folders, or is there somewhere special in Bat!? H

Re: Bat! taking 100% resources

2004-07-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi AceMan, On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, at 22:02:23 [GMT+0100 (BST)] (which was Wed, 7:02:23 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > That's strange. I have used Mozilla and PC-Cillin for over a year and a > half and have *never* experienced *any* of the issues you describe. I am > also using BayesIt too,