Re[2]: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Joan Josep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Leif, Sunday, January 30, 2005, 12:51:01 AM, you wrote: LG Tagline of the day: LG I took an IQ test and the results were negative. I am sure the test was faulty. But this would happen to many holders of driving licences. :-) - -- Best

Re: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Joan, A reminder of what Joan Josep on TBUDL typed on: Saturday, January 29, 2005 at 00:48:51 GMT +0100 JJ Not so. You do not need the sender's key to read an encrypted e-mail, JJ because it will be encrypted to the recipient public key. The JJ recipient only needs his own private key.

Re: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Joan, A reminder of what Joan Josep on TBUDL typed on: Sunday, January 30, 2005 at 10:08:00 GMT +0100 JJ I am sure the test was faulty. But this would happen to many holders JJ of driving licences. Only to BMW and Volvo drivers. -- Best regards,Tony.

Re[2]: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Tony, On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB Spitting hairs now? or even splitting hairs! -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.0.2.10 SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | Opera 8.00 build 7401 PGP public key:

Re: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Richard, A reminder of what Richard Wakeford on TBUDL typed on: Sunday, January 30, 2005 at 12:23:42 GMT +0100 RW or even splitting hairs! Either way there's always someone who contradicts and wants to make the explanations more difficult to understand for a new comer than is

Re: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Tony Boom everyone else, on 30-Jan-2005 at 12:48 you (Tony Boom) wrote: Either way there's always someone who contradicts and wants to make the explanations more difficult to understand for a new comer than is needed. The sentence you dropped about encryption could easily be

Re[2]: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Tony, On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RW or even splitting hairs! TB Either way there's always someone No, it was a quiet admonition that the phrase is splitting hairs and not spitting hairs ;-) -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.0.2.10 SpamPal | Windows XP

Re: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Richard, A reminder of what Richard Wakeford on TBUDL typed on: Sunday, January 30, 2005 at 14:33:49 GMT +0100 RW No, it was a quiet admonition that the phrase is splitting hairs and RW not spitting hairs Your assuming I don't know what the correct phrase is. Still, mustn't make

Re[2]: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Tony, On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB Your assuming I don't know what the correct phrase is. Still, mustn't make TB typing mistakes must we, not with so many Headmasters and finicky people TB on the list. I guess I was expecting that comment. Almost sent a

Re: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Richard, A reminder of what Richard Wakeford on TBUDL typed on: Sunday, January 30, 2005 at 19:02:19 GMT +0100 RW but got other important things to do. Not important enough to stop you sending the original ridicule though was it. -- Best regards,Tony.

Re[2]: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Tony, On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB Not important enough to stop you sending the original ridicule though was TB it. Can't deny that one but now it's dark outside so I can't work in my garden and do other things! -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.0.2.10

Re: The actuality of starting using PGP

2005-01-30 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 30 Jan 2005, @ @ at 11:48:39 +, when Tony Boom wrote: Next time someone asks Can people read signed mail I'll just say yes. An excellent choice, James. (-: I bet

Re: PGP-signed mails

2005-01-30 Thread Edvinas MatiuĊĦaitis
Hello Alexander, On Saturday, January 29, 2005, at 19:03 Lithuanian Time, you wrote: ASK I don't know how Outlook/OE handle those messages, though. Outlook handles PGP/MIME signed messages quite well, it displays emails taxt and signature is displayed as an attachment. Outlook Express can't