Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?

Hi On Thursday 3 March 2005 at 1:56:17 AM, in , Thomas Fernandez wrote: > it really is a shortcoming of MicroEd, which cannot display UTF. > So it's not really a TB bug. Is MicroEd not part of TB!? > For the user that is transparent, but I understand the > programmers to

Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?

Hello MFPA, On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:56:16 + GMT (03/03/2005, 04:56 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: M> From my point of view, switching to the rich text viewer to M> display certain message - against my wishes and contrary to the M> options I have set to view all messages as plain text - is a bug. Fair

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi On Thursday 3 March 2005 at 1:03:13 AM, in , Melissa Reese wrote: >> I cannot verify Melissa's messages because I don't have the keys > Did you see the URL in my signature? :-) I forgot to look there. After PGP tried some keyservers

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

Hi MFPA, On Wednesday, March 02, 2005, at 4:43:42 PM PST, you wrote: > I cannot verify Melissa's messages because I don't have the keys Did you see the URL in my signature? :-) > but the rest of this thread all check out OK here, using PGP8.1 By the way, the message of David's that Mica found

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi On Thursday 3 March 2005 at 12:25:18 AM, in , David Calvarese wrote: > I'm not sure either... They're showing good sigs on my end when I > look in my sent items folder. Maybe because I'm using something > other than SHA-1 as a digest

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

Mica Mijatovic wrote: >>> I'm not sure, but do you have my keys in your keyring? If that's not >>> it, maybe someone on the list will know. > > I got your keys and it shows this: > > gpg: Signature made 03/02/05 20:40:16 Central Europe Standard Time using DSA > key ID 1C9D5360 > gpg: WARNING: s

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 02 Mar 2005, @ @ at 15:06:24 -0500, when David Calvarese wrote: > Mica Mijatovic wrote: >> I get this when check your signature, David. This sort of GPG message is >> new to me

Re: splitting msgs

Hi On Wednesday 2 March 2005 at 6:40:02 PM, in , Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > I've disabled message splitting It must be disabled by default because I didn't even know it was there and it is off for all my accounts. (What does it have to do with Files & directories? I would

Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?

Hi On Wednesday 2 March 2005 at 4:26:32 PM, in , Thomas Fernandez wrote: > I always saw UTF-support in the PTV as a feature request, > right-clicking and changing the encoding manually has always > helped over here. From my point of view, switching to the rich text viewe

Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?

Hi On Wednesday 2 March 2005 at 5:12:49 AM, in , Roman Katzer wrote: > Is this worth a bug report? There are already several about UTF-8. Perhaps this is related to one of them? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat!

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

Hi David, On Wednesday, March 02, 2005, at 11:40:13 AM PST, you wrote: > Upgrade to the 1.4.1rc2, it fixes that problem. Hee hee! I just sent you an off-list message relating the interesting, yet disturbing experience of installing this new version of GnuPG. Problems went way beyond simple TB! i

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

Mica Mijatovic wrote: >***^\ ."_)~~ > ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 02 Mar 2005, >@ @ at 14:40:13 -0500, when David Calvarese wrote: > > . > > I get this when check your signature, David. This sort of GPG message is > new to me. What that would mean? > > gpg:

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 02 Mar 2005, @ @ at 14:40:13 -0500, when David Calvarese wrote: . I get this when check your signature, David. This sort of GPG message is new to me. What that would mean?

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

Melissa Reese wrote: > Here's what happens when I try to verify a simple inline clear > signature using the TB! integration with GnuPG: > > gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available Upgrade to the 1.4.1rc2, it fixes that problem. Note that there are other GnuPG issues, especially whe

Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

Hi, I'm having problems with both GnuPG and PGP with regards to integration with TB! The problems are more severe with GnuPG, so I'll start with that. Please note that I'm still using TB! v2.12.00. I'm using GnuPG v1.4.0, and PGP v8.1. Here's what happens when I try to verify a simple inline cl

Re: splitting msgs

Hello Jan Rifkinson & everyone else, on 02-Mrz-2005 at 02:04 you (Jan Rifkinson) wrote: > So let's say I'm sending out a msg with 4 small photos within the msg > as photo inserts in an html photo. > In my case TB! split this msg into 4 msgs. How does TB! split up the > msg, between photos or wha

tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com

Hello Thomas, On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:33:25 +0700 GMT (02/03/2005, 23:33 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> 你好 TF> I pasted this into Notepad and from there back into the TB editor. TF> Displays fine. Let's see how it arrives when it comes back through the TF> list. Still looks fine. -- C

tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com

Hello Jack, On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:24:03 -0500 GMT (02/03/2005, 12:24 +0700 GMT), Jack wrote: J> I've been having problems with copying Chinese J> characters from TheBat! editor. I can paste J> native encoding of Chinese (GB2312) in thebat J> editor and it displays OK. But when I copy from J> the

Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?

Hello Roman, On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:12:49 -0500 GMT (02/03/2005, 12:12 +0700 GMT), Roman Katzer wrote: RK> Thanks for the suggestion. I had tried and not mentioned that. RK> It didn't help. As you suspected correctly, the encoding shown was "none", RK> setting it to Auto made it choose Central Eur

tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 2 Mar 2005, @ @ at 00:24:03 -0500, when Jack wrote: > Any solutions to this problem? I wasn't dealing with Chinese characters, but generally TB makes in the very same way impos