Re[2]: Content dependent on subject contents through macro

2006-03-22 Thread Marten Gallagher
> That should have read >You could set up your message template in this way. Create a QUICK > template for >your new messages call NewMessageTemplate. Then set up the new template > for the >account to be >%_Match=%SetPattRegexp="- eom"%RegexpMatch="%Subject"%- >%If:"%_Match

Re: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 22 Mar 2006, @ @ at 21:17:31 +, when Paul Meathrel wrote: > OK, does this suit you better. I've temporarily switched to MicroEd to > see how things go for a few days. I

Re: Content dependent on subject contents through macro

2006-03-22 Thread Robin Anson
That should have read You could set up your message template in this way. Create a QUICK template for your new messages call NewMessageTemplate. Then set up the new template for the account to be %_Match=%SetPattRegexp="- eom"%RegexpMatch="%Subject"%- %If:"%_Match"<>"":"thistext"

Re: Content dependent on subject contents through macro

2006-03-22 Thread Robin Anson
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 at 19:23:57 +, Marten wrote: > What I wanted was: > > IF > a certain string of characters [" - eom"] exists in the hand-written subject > THEN > complete the body with > %thistext% You could set up your message template in this way. Create a template for your new messages c

Re: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 22 Mar 2006, @ @ at 13:20:10 -0600, when Chris wrote: > Personally, I don't like reading yellow text on a white background... > :-) Sometimes reading even blackest text on

Re: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Paul Meathrel & everyone else, on 22-Mrz-2006 at 22:17 you (Paul Meathrel) wrote: >> Your original message is just one single very long line which appears >> as three lines in my preview window - I find that rather hard to >> read. > OK, does this suit you better. I've temporarily switched

Re[2]: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Paul, Wednesday, March 22, 2006, 3:17:31 PM, you wrote: PM> As far as the Help file goes, it seems to indicate that ALT-L means PM> "Align the block on left end". When I try it on your text and on mine PM> it doesn't appear to do anything, what exactly does it do? Try typing a Paragraph wit

Re: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread Paul Meathrel
Hi Alexander, Wednesday, March 22, 2006, 6:53:06 PM, you wrote: > For me its the (auto)formatting options and the hard wrapping at the > column I specify. WinEd just wraps on-screen, but not in the > actually sent message. Your original message is just one single very > long line which appears as

Re[2]: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread vitalie vrabie
hi, Wednesday, March 22, 2006, 9:00:40 PM, you wrote: > when composing a message in The Bat's MicroEd editor, > you can be sure it will be displayed for all of your recipients > in exactly the same way you're composing it. ...with the condition that they'll view with a fixed-width font and their

Re[2]: Copying addressbook from non-OTFE to OTFE

2006-03-22 Thread vitalie vrabie
hi, Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 9:49:21 PM, you wrote: > I'll buy me another one and try to install Voyager. But I'll have to take the > time to read how to install it (can I "copy all the settings of my regular > version?) and think about a "strategy" for using it. depends on the type of the accou

Re: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 22 Mar 2006, @ @ at 20:00:40 +0100, when [EMAIL PROTECTED] explained advantages of TB's wsygfdjjkfd MicroEd(itor): > This is a dream come true that can never c

Re[2]: Content dependent on subject contents through macro

2006-03-22 Thread Marten Gallagher
>> Look at the %CLIPBOARD macro. >> >> You have to manually copy the line (I think), but then you can do all >> sorts of cool stuff with that line. > I'm aware about %CLIPBOARD macro, but I think that is not what Marten is > looking for. Hmmm... possibility but not precisely what I was hoping mig

Re: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 3/22/2006 1:00:40 PM "MicroEd vs Plain text" > In one word, wysiwyg. Using MicroEd, you're guaranteed that what you > see on your screen as you type your message, will be delivered > looking exactly the same to all recipients of your message, > irrespectively of what software

Re: Content dependent on subject contents through macro

2006-03-22 Thread MAU
Hello Chris, >> I don't think you can "transfer" a line from the body to the >> subject, at least I don't know how to do it. > > Look at the %CLIPBOARD macro. > > You have to manually copy the line (I think), but then you can do all > sorts of cool stuff with that line. I'm aware about %CLIPBOARD

Re: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 22 Mar 2006, @ @ at 18:02:30 +, when Paul Meathrel wrote: > Someone suggested that I use MicroEd as my mail editor rather than > the "Plain text (Windows)" editor that

Re: Content dependent on subject contents through macro

2006-03-22 Thread Chris
MAU @ 3/22/2006 10:05:15 AM "Content dependent on subject contents through macro" > I don't think you can "transfer" a line from the body to the > subject, at least I don't know how to do it. Look at the %CLIPBOARD macro. You have to manually copy the line (I think), but then you can do all so

Re: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread aam
A Bat-fellow, Paul Meathrel, wrote in on Wednesday, 22nd March 2006 at 18:02:30 (GMT), which was 19:02 in Bratislava -- > So here's the question, what are the benefits of MicroEd as compared > with the Plain text editor? In one word, wysiwyg. Using MicroEd, you're guaranteed that what you see o

Re: MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Paul Meathrel & everyone else, on 22-Mrz-2006 at 19:02 you (Paul Meathrel) wrote: > So here's the question, what are the benefits of MicroEd as compared > with the Plain text editor? For me its the (auto)formatting options and the hard wrapping at the column I specify. WinEd just wraps on-

Re: Ignoring URL's whilst Spellchecking

2006-03-22 Thread Paul Meathrel
Hi all, The plot thickens further... When running a spell check whilst using the "Plain text (windows)" editor in a message with at least two items which the Spell-checker will highlight use the Ignore all button on the Spell-checker. This closes the Spell-checker. However if you do exactly th

MicroEd vs Plain text

2006-03-22 Thread Paul Meathrel
Hi all, Someone suggested that I use MicroEd as my mail editor rather than the "Plain text (Windows)" editor that I use currently. My main objection to this is that it only appears to use fixed-width fonts which I don't want to get used to unless I have to. So here's the question, what are the

Re: Content dependent on subject contents through macro

2006-03-22 Thread MAU
Hello Marten, Sorry for my late reply. >> type something in the body and complete the subject and body from it. I >> use that a lot. > > Hmmm that sounds possible - not perfect bit possible - so the next question > is how to do that? > > I guess the macro called by the eom handle sets the subject

Re: Copying addressbook from non-OTFE to OTFE

2006-03-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello vitalie, On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:14:25 +0200 GMT (22/03/2006, 00:14 +0700 GMT), vitalie vrabie wrote: >> I also have a second AB, and when I create this in Voyager, it asks >> where to import from - but allows only EBD files. vv> THAT is not an import per se; it's rather a prompt to point

Re: Copying addressbook from non-OTFE to OTFE

2006-03-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Alexander, On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:38:37 +0100 GMT (21/03/2006, 23:38 +0700 GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: >> How do I go about? The AB in Voyager is empty, so an overwrite would >> be OK. ASK> Backup & Restore only the AB. This worked. Thanks a lot. -- Cheers, Thomas. Cadix liegt auf

Re[2]: What was that 'close all folders' shortcut?

2006-03-22 Thread Marten Gallagher
>> shortcut to close all folders > Ctrl + * (on the numeric keypad) Thanks - acutally CTRL + 8 does it for me as well as * on num pad. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.71.03 with POPFile 0.22.4 on Windows XP 5.1 ___

Re: What was that 'close all folders' shortcut?

2006-03-22 Thread Feli Wilcke
Hello Marten, On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:46:32 +GMT Marten Gallagher wrote: MG> Recently someone pointed out that a shortcut existed to close all folers in MG> the folder tree, and also opened all folders. Ctrl + * (on the numeric keypad) -- Regards, Feli The Bat! 3.72.04 (Beta) on Windows XP

What was that 'close all folders' shortcut?

2006-03-22 Thread Marten Gallagher
Recently someone pointed out that a shortcut existed to close all folers in the folder tree, and also opened all folders. I can't find it and can't remember it. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.71.03 with POPFile 0.22.4 on Windows XP 5.1 tbudl@the