Re: Emulating Gmail Threading/Conversation

2006-12-13 Thread Dan Perez
Hello Kelvin, Wednesday, December 13, 2006, 8:20:58 PM, you wrote: > snip > I notice that when new replies come into a thread, The Bat doesn't > automatically push the entire thread to the top. This is so even when > I sort messages according to "Received" time. > snip You can change your def

Re: Test

2006-12-13 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Baphomet, On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 you wrote in Sorry, no sig delimiter! -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.86.10 beta with POP3 account & AntispamSniper 1.7.0.8 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot | CPU: Athlon

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: TB! still has negative image)

2006-12-13 Thread Akebono Translation Service
Dear Roelof, > Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists > of a , i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line. > This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without > the signature and list footers since everything below and including > the sig delimiter is exclude

Test

2006-12-13 Thread Baphomet
Sorry, Test mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Emulating Gmail Threading/Conversation

2006-12-13 Thread Kelvin Quee
Hello, I notice that when new replies come into a thread, The Bat doesn't automatically push the entire thread to the top. This is so even when I sort messages according to "Received" time. This behaviour is typical if you use the gmail webinterface. It is very useful because not only you can see

Mod: Cut mark (was: TB! still has negative image)

2006-12-13 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Loek, On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:54:26 +0100GMT (14-12-2006, 0:54 +0200, where I live), you wrote: LVK> I'm new to this list, Welcome. However, you're message is breaking a list rule, hence thos reply. Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person be

Re: TB! still has negative image

2006-12-13 Thread Akebono Translation Service
Dear all, > How do we fight the negative image? > What is the best response? I'm new to this list, but let me give my opinion anyway. The first thing I would do is improve the communication with my user base - it seems to take one month on the average until the developers of The Bat! actually r

Re: TB! still has negative image

2006-12-13 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear A, @14-Dec-2006, 00:36 +0100 (13-Dec 23:36 here) A.Translator [AT] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ... AT> "Beware: TheBat! is well-known as a spammer's mailer (even if the AT> spammers just fake headers from TheBat!) and it's often blocked." ... AT> How do we fight the negative image?

TB! still has negative image

2006-12-13 Thread A . Translator
Today I posted a message in comp.lang.php about a php form question. It had to do with how mail client like TB or OE react to my form. To my horror and surprise, the first respons I got mentioned this: "Beware: TheBat! is well-known as a spammer's mailer (even if the spammers just fake headers

Re: Voyager re-install problem

2006-12-13 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Gerrit, On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 you wrote in GK> No problem at all. I offered you a hack. Surely the way I go about GK> this is not the recommended way for any normal installation. It gives GK> you the possibility to reinstall Voyager on the USB stick even after GK> you formatted it without us

Mod: DEAD HORSE (was: Updating TB! - Knoppix on HDD, Wine and pretas, ghouls and other monsters)

2006-12-13 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jernej, On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:08:51 +0100GMT (13-12-2006, 10:08 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JS> Modern Linux distributions let you do as you please. For a typical home Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if t

Re: Updating TB! - Knoppix on HDD, Wine and pretas, ghouls and other monsters

2006-12-13 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Wednesday, December 13, 2006, 0:55:22, Mica Mijatovic wrote: > Yes, they do that too, and in various ways. Basically, the entire > "administration" can be (and indeed is, by more advanced, "demanding", > "weird" users) divided into much more specialized sectors, and perhaps > best example is th