Re: anti-spam snipper

2007-03-27 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello monsell, On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 you wrote in msl> The spam-filter that i use is 'ANTI-SPAM SNIPPER' which works msl> absolutely fine. Erm, are you sure the name isn't AntispamSniper?? I've just done a google on "Snipper" and can't find it. msl> I have set up so many filters by using either

anti-spam snipper

2007-03-27 Thread monsell
Hi Batters!, The spam-filter that i use is 'ANTI-SPAM SNIPPER' which works absolutely fine. I have set up so many filters by using either the full email id or its domain only. I assume that messages coming from this particular email id or domain is considered ham. for example I set up a filter c

Re[2]: filter incoming mails according to what time they were created

2007-03-27 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Tom, Monday, March 26, 2007, 1:55:38 PM, among other things, I wrote: R> I will set up some similar filters here and see what happens and report R> back. I initially set up three filters in the following order: 1. Time of creation 00.00 to 07.59 2. Time of creation 08.00

Re: Choosing alternate address

2007-03-27 Thread Pascal
I, too, would very much like to know this very trick :) Nick Danger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is there some way to pick an alternate email address (assuming you > have more than one entered for that person) while composing a message > without opening the address book, going to that entry,

Choosing alternate address

2007-03-27 Thread Nick Danger
Is there some way to pick an alternate email address (assuming you have more than one entered for that person) while composing a message without opening the address book, going to that entry, then copying and pasting it into the "To:" line? -- ò.ó Nick Danger [MUA: TB! Voyager 3.98.6] [OS: Wind

Re: MyRealBox IMAP Configuration?

2007-03-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Bob, On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:59:25 +1000 GMT (26/03/2007, 10:59 +0700 GMT), Bob Morris wrote: >> Wow, they should have sent an email to everybody! Thanks for >> mentioning it. BM> If I had known that you wanted one I would have let you have one of BM> mine :-) - I was receiving at least one