Hi Günter,
That makes some sense if I understand it correctly: with IMAP, the
folder structure moves from the local computer to the server
Theoretically, the other way around: What is on the server will be
seen by the client, by any client. Of course, you use the client to
create and move
Guten Tag Bob Riley,
Then at the end of the article, it says this about TB!:
There are currently no known troubleshooting issues with this client.
You know that this is not true. TheBat IMAP _is_ a troubleshooting
issue to begin with. Even the developers admit that the system is
rotten from
On Friday, July 18, 2008, 1:27:36 PM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
On Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:46:43 PM, Günter Minnerup wrote:
I have such an archive account already, to keep my POP3 message base
manageable. So what you're saying is simply move everything beyond
the server quota into the archive
I haven't encountered a virus problem with gmail yet, but you might
try AVG (there's a free version available).
I would say: Don't do that - the AVG 8 plug-in is buggy and messages
(or rather, the *task* of outgoing and incoming messages) might just
hang at any rate. I have seen this
Hello Günter,
Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:50:08 PM, you wrote:
GM So the local folder structure is an exact replica of that on the
GM server, and both are automatically synchronised?
Yes, sort of. You can set your local setup to only download headers and then you
will only have the headers on
Hi Alto,
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:11 +0200, you wrote:
Guten Tag Bob Riley,
Then at the end of the article, it says this about TB!:
There are currently no known troubleshooting issues with this client.
I was merely quoting the above from the fastmail.fm mail client setup:
Hello all,
Friday, July 18, 2008, Bob Riley wrote:
I was merely quoting the above from the fastmail.fm mail client setup:
http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/imap/thebat.htm
On the above page is this:
The Bat! is an excellent POP client, but its IMAP support is currently
extremely limited. If you
On Friday, July 18, 2008, 12:49:34 PM, Bob Riley wrote:
I would love to use TB for IMAP but won't until you more
knowledgeable people say TB is very practical in IMAP.
I would be interested to know what features I am missing. I too tried
lots of those other mailers, such as thunderbird,
8 matches
Mail list logo
