Hi Miles,
> Just a little off topic. I'm also the user of Shanghai telecom. I agree that
> its
> service is bad sometimes. But, trust me, the service of netcom(merged into
> unioncom now) is worse. Perhaps we can discuss those things in private
> mails:-)
Condolences about Shanghai Telecom ;)
Hello RS,
> Not mentioning that due to the fact that I live in Shanghai sometimes
> the links embedded in the message are not possible to be downloaded
> from some foreign servers (with a high ping and sometimes Time Out up
> to 50%) - service quality I know, so I do not complain here j
>
> As I read Abigail's message, only one message that referred to the
> attachment existed before the backup, and afterwards there were five more
> but still only one message referring to it. The creation of the five
> superfluous copies certainly sounds like a big to me, and a fairly serious
> on
On Thursday, August 11, 2011, at 3:20:51 AM, Marck Pearlstone wrote:
AM>> Obviously this a a bug and not a feature.
> Not so. This is entirely predicted, predictable and required behaviour.
As I read Abigail's message, only one message that referred to the
attachment existed before the backup, a
Dear Abigail,
@10-Aug-2011, 21:49 -0700 (11-Aug 05:49:35 here) Abigail Marshall
[AM] in
mid:CAHOAKLbM=xkl3-tt6sfwinfkrcrsaczgczowhv73_x2p84w...@mail.gmail.com
said:
AM> OK, now I'm really frustrated -- the problem is with TheBat creating
AM> unnecessary duplicates of attachments.
...
AM> Obvious
5 matches
Mail list logo