Re: Old files, file extension questions (Cache Matter :))

2011-08-11 Thread RS (FEDARA)
Hi Miles, > Just a little off topic. I'm also the user of Shanghai telecom. I agree that > its > service is bad sometimes. But, trust me, the service of netcom(merged into > unioncom now) is worse. Perhaps we can discuss those things in private > mails:-) Condolences about Shanghai Telecom ;)

Re: Old files, file extension questions (Cache Matter :))

2011-08-11 Thread Miles Chang
Hello RS, > Not mentioning that due to the fact that I live in Shanghai sometimes > the links embedded in the message are not possible to be downloaded > from some foreign servers (with a high ping and sometimes Time Out up > to 50%) - service quality I know, so I do not complain here j

Re: Replicating Attachment problems.

2011-08-11 Thread Abigail Marshall
> > As I read Abigail's message, only one message that referred to the > attachment existed before the backup, and afterwards there were five more > but still only one message referring to it. The creation of the five > superfluous copies certainly sounds like a big to me, and a fairly serious > on

Re: Replicating Attachment problems.

2011-08-11 Thread Jim Kyle
On Thursday, August 11, 2011, at 3:20:51 AM, Marck Pearlstone wrote: AM>> Obviously this a a bug and not a feature. > Not so. This is entirely predicted, predictable and required behaviour. As I read Abigail's message, only one message that referred to the attachment existed before the backup, a

Re: Replicating Attachment problems.

2011-08-11 Thread Marck Pearlstone
Dear Abigail, @10-Aug-2011, 21:49 -0700 (11-Aug 05:49:35 here) Abigail Marshall [AM] in mid:CAHOAKLbM=xkl3-tt6sfwinfkrcrsaczgczowhv73_x2p84w...@mail.gmail.com said: AM> OK, now I'm really frustrated -- the problem is with TheBat creating AM> unnecessary duplicates of attachments. ... AM> Obvious