Re: Gmail issues (re-opened)

2011-08-12 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Rick, On Friday, August 12, 2011 you wrote: >> A Bat-fellow, Jack S. LaRosa, >> wrote in >> on Friday, 12th August 2011 at 10:21:51 (GMT -0500), >> which was 17:21 in Bratislava -- The other day I noticed the following: When I reply (usually via f4), the reply is addressed to,

Re: Gmail issues (re-opened)

2011-08-12 Thread Rick
> A Bat-fellow, Jack S. LaRosa, > wrote in > on Friday, 12th August 2011 at 10:21:51 (GMT -0500), > which was 17:21 in Bratislava -- >>> The other day I noticed the following: >>> When I reply (usually via f4), the reply is addressed to, for example: >>> Mortimer Snerd >>> That will always bo

Re: Gmail issues (re-opened)

2011-08-12 Thread aam
A Bat-fellow, Jack S. LaRosa, wrote in on Friday, 12th August 2011 at 10:21:51 (GMT -0500), which was 17:21 in Bratislava -- >> The other day I noticed the following: >> When I reply (usually via f4), the reply is addressed to, for example: >> Mortimer Snerd >> That will always bounce. Howeve

Re: Gmail issues (re-opened)

2011-08-12 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Leonard, On Friday, August 12, 2011 you wrote: LSB> Last spring, I posted the following: >>I have been having e-mail to several Gmail users. I wonder whether >>other folks have been having this problem and whether anyone knows >>what can be done about this? >>Your message cannot be delive

Gmail issues (re-opened)

2011-08-12 Thread Leonard S. Berkowitz
Last spring, I posted the following: >I have been having e-mail to several Gmail users. I wonder whether >other folks have been having this problem and whether anyone knows >what can be done about this? >Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: I did not put a lot of energy

Re: Replicating Attachment problems.

2011-08-12 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Abigail, Thursday, August 11, 2011, 7:10:31 PM, you wrote: AM> I don't think that would be a good fit for my needs -- it would make it a AM> lot harder for me to locate and find documents over time. Not with Archivarius 3000... The only problem with the combination TB!/Archivarius is t