Hello Rick,
On Friday, August 12, 2011 you wrote:
>> A Bat-fellow, Jack S. LaRosa,
>> wrote in
>> on Friday, 12th August 2011 at 10:21:51 (GMT -0500),
>> which was 17:21 in Bratislava --
The other day I noticed the following:
When I reply (usually via f4), the reply is addressed to,
> A Bat-fellow, Jack S. LaRosa,
> wrote in
> on Friday, 12th August 2011 at 10:21:51 (GMT -0500),
> which was 17:21 in Bratislava --
>>> The other day I noticed the following:
>>> When I reply (usually via f4), the reply is addressed to, for example:
>>> Mortimer Snerd
>>> That will always bo
A Bat-fellow, Jack S. LaRosa,
wrote in
on Friday, 12th August 2011 at 10:21:51 (GMT -0500),
which was 17:21 in Bratislava --
>> The other day I noticed the following:
>> When I reply (usually via f4), the reply is addressed to, for example:
>> Mortimer Snerd
>> That will always bounce. Howeve
Hello Leonard,
On Friday, August 12, 2011 you wrote:
LSB> Last spring, I posted the following:
>>I have been having e-mail to several Gmail users. I wonder whether
>>other folks have been having this problem and whether anyone knows
>>what can be done about this?
>>Your message cannot be delive
Last spring, I posted the following:
>I have been having e-mail to several Gmail users. I wonder whether
>other folks have been having this problem and whether anyone knows
>what can be done about this?
>Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
I did not put a lot of energy
Hello Abigail,
Thursday, August 11, 2011, 7:10:31 PM, you wrote:
AM> I don't think that would be a good fit for my needs -- it would make it a
AM> lot harder for me to locate and find documents over time.
Not with Archivarius 3000... The only problem with the combination
TB!/Archivarius is t
6 matches
Mail list logo