?
Thanks a lot
Best regards
Christophe
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
> On Saturday, February 14, 2004 , Christophe wrote:
C>> I've the common "spam folder" (where I filter spam with rules) that
C>> originally was à the bottom alone. I think i made a wrong
C>> manipulation, it's now as a subfolder of my "inbox&qu
> Hi Christophe,
> Could you try this?
> 1) Select the folder.
> 2) Press Ctrl+Shift+Left until it doesn't go any further.
> Alternatively, you can right-click the folder and choose "Move Out".
> It should now move until it's not a child of an account anymor
Hello,
I receive spams that are empty, empty in the headers, empty message...
is it possible to filter them to redirect them into my spam folder.
Which string to use for the rule ?
Thanks
Christophe
--
Best regards,
Christophe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
How to disable the sounds for each action in the bat 3.00.8, they are
irritating ;-)
Thanks a lot,
Christophe
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
now where to desable them, I searched
the options, but with no result :-(
Thanks
--
Best regards,
Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
??
Do you think it comes from the fact I have a "selected download"
filter based on a .txt file containing hundreds of e-mail spammers and
an option to "kill" mail ?
Thanks a lot,
--
Best regards,
Christophe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
quot;originator", in the "advanced tab", option "kill"
actived, detection method "any string match" actived, then the dir of
the spam txt file
I join to your mail box a copy of this .txt file
Thanks
--
Best regards,
Ch
e massages on the server ?
It's strange...
Thanks a lot
--
Best regards,
Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
an incoming filter with keywords that send suspicious
mail in a spam folder taht i can sometim esverify before deleting :-)
Thanks
Christophe
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
uot;selected download" is not very trustworthy ! I prefer for the
moment deal with an incoming filter with keywords that send suspicious
mail in a spam folder taht i can sometimes verify before deleting :-)
--
Best regards,
Christophe
the "from" but this time for the reply-to ? I tried %OREPLYADDR it's not that it
is without
effect !
Thanks
Christophe
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, March 1, 2003, 1:36:49 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Christophe,
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:49:22 +0100 GMT (01/03/03, 02:49 +0700 GMT),
> Christophe wrote:
>> The "from" is now Ok with the macro %From="%OTOADDR" , but I just
>> dis
quot;detection method" : I
have selected "any string match" and I wonder it is a good solution ?
What do you think ? I'd just want it deletes all mail from the exact
address indicated in the .txt file, so as to have the least errors of
route... Thnks for
pam folder that I can verify sometimes.
What is the effect of the "ignore" choice if is not dispatched on
server ?
Thanks,
Christophe
France
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
can verify before deleting...
Thanks,
Best Regards
Christophe
France
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
pam had
> been created, the email address was already out of commission by the
> time I got there.
I dit not know this process with SpamCop
Thanks
--
Best regards,
Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chine. Neither will the message be
>deleted from the server. It's just that... ignored. :)
Ok, it doesn't resolve the problem, so "ignored" is not a founction
for me
>You may then, at any time, use the Mail Dispatcher to examine these
>ignored messages and
;t do it very often, because I use different
> account settings on my laptop (leave messages on server, use X-Ray),
> and it takes time to change these for 7 accounts.
Thanks for these tips, very interesting...
Thnaks a lot Julian,
Friendly,
Christophe
_
quired by spamcop. Whenenver I encounter a spam, I hit crtl-alt-S
> and don't need to examine the headers by myself. Saves me a lot of
> time.
it's very practical? why not to try !
Thanks a lot,
--
Friendly,
Christophe
Hello Paul,
> try this link:
> http://www.spamcop.com/
> Marck has made some filters for TB that will send the SPAM off to
> spamcop with little problem- all you do is CTRL-ALT-S and the message is
> sent! it is free!!
Thanks Paul :-)
--
Best regar
d account "from", like originaly in the headers...
If you have got an idea ?
Thanks,
--
Best regards,
Christophe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ok but it depends on. I can not indicate one address in this tab, it
varies... Is there a posibility to set and to oblige TB with
displaying the original sender ?
Thanks
--
Best regards,
Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
ply
> applies if you mean the original recipient; otherwise I misunderstood
> you from the beginning.
yes it was a confusion of my part :-)
Thanks
--
Best regards,
Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
t an idea,
Thanks,
Good WE
--
Best regards,
Christophe
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Anne,
Saturday, February 15, 2003, 10:12:32 PM, you wrote:
> Saturday, February 15, 2003, 1:52:12 PM, Christophe wrote:
C>> my problem is solved but I just see now that sent mail with this procedure
C>> were placed in the "sent mail" of the principal account, the
Do likewise for account3, etc
Thanks, I dit it, excellent :-) I didn't think to use outgoing filter,
less used than incoming filter, thanks again :-)
--
Best regards,
Christophemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cur
splay the resulting information in the pager less"
SL> Oh, yeah, that is much easier. Yeah. *eyeroll*
Nice one. I liked it :-)
What could we "say" for the command "w" ?
Regards,
Christophe
Using The Bat! 1.36
under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service P
"do everything" server and now I
use Linux/Samba for the "same" thing. NT is mandatory for a program we
use, so I keep it; but everything else is now done by the Linux box.
I prefer command line tools that let me in control of what is
happening rather than graphical inter
Hello,
Why are some X-mailer contents different ?
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.36) S/N / Personal
and
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.36) S/N
Best regards,
Christophe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.36
under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service
Hello,
On jeudi 4 novembre 1999, someone (you) said :
MM> Hello,
MM> Thursday, November 04, 1999, You wrote:
>> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.36) S/N / Personal
MM> newer registrations
>> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.36) S/N
MM> old registrations
thanks.
Rega
31 matches
Mail list logo