Hello Allie, > If your list contains a list of addresses to filter on, then the > parameter to use is as you've done 'any string match'.
Ok C>> I'd just want it deletes all mail from the exact address indicated in C>> the .txt file, > It will do this, but remember that there should be no blank lines in > your text file. A space in a new line will be considered a string to > match. a simple space could break my conditions ? not good ! and the second option "all strings must match", would have which effect in my case ? What I want to do is simple : Either the expeditor is listed (exact email), it's deleted ; or not, it can pass :-) my txt file contains adresses like that [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... C>> so as to have the least errors of route... Thnks for your help > My suggestion is to not delete mail in this way, especially if you're > uncertain about the efficacy of your filtering. > The worst thing about a spammer can do to you is to make you lose legitimate mail. Spammers are very pernicious ;-) > You > should really examine these messages before deleting them. Why not > use the ignore option. In this way you can examine the ignored > messages using the dispatcher and then delete and download as you > desire. This would work especially well if you normally delete your > messages from the server after a download. Yes but the problem is I don't use the dispatcher on server ; I have a first antispam filter based on a hundred keywords on alternatives strings that send suspicious mail in a spam folder that I can verify sometimes. What is the effect of the "ignore" choice if is not dispatched on server ? Thanks, Christophe France ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
