TB 2.00.6 not indicating new mail in folders

Hello list, I am experiencing some problems with TB. It no longer shows that there is new e-mail. The account icon shows "empty", the folder name is not printed in bold, the message ticker remains quiet. Only when I click on the folder that I know has new e-mail in it, TB wakes up and puts out all

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

trol over the presentation. The use of tags like , , leave it completely open on how to display the text. So, I would agree with the bandwidth issue but if you want recipient choice, then HTML is the better way. Concerning bad taste, people can write horribly in plain ASCII too. Frank --

Re: how to send email to one particular address

More parameters exist; check the online help and search for 'Command line parameter' I tested this by creating a shortcut on my desktop, right-click, properties, and pasting in the parameters in target field (outside the double quotes (")). Frank -- Best regards, FJ de Br

The Bat v2.0 crashed and failed to restart

eep messages on the server for a few days before deleting them. Now the question, is there anything else that I have overlooked and that need to be restored? What else is kept in the configuration files in the directory 'Program Files/The Bat!' Time for a strong coffee. Frank --

Re[3]: Spam plugin download location ?

haviour. I guess the plug-in is not yet ready for general use and I am about to unload it. Frank -- Best regards, FJ de Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[4]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

ime, I end up at programs like Spampal, K9, Popfile. While they do the trick, I would prefer a solution that does not need yet another active process on my machine. Frank -- Best regards, FJ de Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Current version

Re[2]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

a corrupt index file and suggests to remove it. If only I knew which file that would be... Frank -- Best regards, FJ de Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: so is version 2 here yet .... :-)

1.61 that A> I wouldn't want to live without any longer. Such as, Can you (or someone else) confirm that Bayesian filtering made it into the final 2.0 version? I tried to look for this info on the ritlabs site but I could not find any reference. Frank -- Best regards, FJ de B

Re[2]: invalid HTML

Hello Daniel, Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 6:14:52 PM, you wrote: DR> DR> Get The Bat! 1.62h, the problem is supposed to be fixed. Where would I find that version? -- Best regards, FJ de Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Current ver

Re[2]: Adding addresses to Address book

argued that one should not be led by dogmas but select which way to quote based on the situation, the nature of the question/reply, the audience, personal taste etc.. Frank -- Best regards, FJ de Bruin Current version is 1.61 | &

Re[2]: Adding addresses to Address book

sensus. I will put the topic it to bed. Frank -- Best regards, FJ de Bruin Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Adding addresses to Address book

Hello Adam, Saturday, August 10, 2002, 11:51:10 AM, you wrote: AR> Without appearing to seem rude AR> AR> Read what Marck was saying, it's not what YOU or I want, its what the AR> recipient wants - and in this case its the list. I read what Marck said. He said that top-quoting is h

Re[2]: Adding addresses to Address book

Hello Marck, Saturday, August 10, 2002, 10:56:01 AM, you wrote: MDP> Indeed it does. N.B: For any potential defenders of that hideous habit MDP> - - email presentation is not about *your* preference or ease, but that MDP> of your recipients. As a recipient I prefer to get a top quoted reply that