On Thursday, January 1, 2004 @ 11:30:34 AM [-0700], Joseph N. wrote:
> The status line at the bottom of my TB! screen has gone missing! Any
> idea how to return it to its rightful place??
View/Log Panel?
--
Matt
Current version is 2.02.3 CE |
On Friday, January 2, 2004 @ 2:24:28 PM [-0700], S & J Love wrote:
> Presumably most are on this list because they are The Bat!
> devotess and would opine that The Bat! is a winner by a country mile!
One of the users, Tony Bloom, has used both quite a bit and is
probably going to have the best in
Hi,
Not sure if this is possible...I've been unable to find reference to
it in the archives. I would like to have a shortcut key that activates
a manual filter. The filter is a simple "if shortcut key is hit, move
to folder 'Important'". How would I do this?
--
Regards,
Matt
__
On Tuesday, January 6, 2004 @ 4:31:06 AM [-0700], MAU wrote:
> See the Options tab of the manual filter in question.
Grr...I can't believe I missed that. Thanks.
--
Matt
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silve
On Tuesday, January 6, 2004 @ 4:43:29 AM [-0700], Andre Wichartz wrote:
> In the filter's properties under the options tab there is 'Execute
> action set of this rule by pressing Hot Key' Does this what you want?
It is yes. I totally overlooked it. Thanks.
--
Matt
On Tuesday, January 6, 2004 @ 2:44:23 PM [-0700], Kitty wrote:
> addition congruent malnourished masterpiece patterson planetaria legacy washboard
> coerce prognosticate rose edison burr bedim venturesome attica mutton seller
> propel duff varsity shields ingrate mcclain continual memorabilia
Is
On Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 7:25:37 AM [-0700], Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> I was talking to Allie about Outlook 2003... I have to say it is much
> improved. There is even a "unread mail" folder which shows all your
> unread mail across folders, a bit like TB's ticker ;)
Hmm...I actually have 2
On Wednesday, February 4, 2004 @ 11:23:19 AM [-0700], Allie Martin wrote:
> I know that threading by references rocks and agree with the convenience
> but some may choose not to do so for whatever reason they may have.
I'll hop in here...I do "TbR" (Thread by Reference) with most of my
folders bu
On Friday, February 27, 2004 @ 11:09:54 AM [-0700], Martin Webster wrote:
> ,- [ Edit Mail Message -> "... on
> TBBETA"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> |
> | Message has not been sent. Server reply - r mail, end with "." on a line
> | by itself
> |
> `-
> What does this mean, and what could have c
Hi,
I use Ctrl+RightArrow a lot to move to my next new message. However, I
would much prefer it to move to my _oldest_ next unread message, not
the newest as this goes through e-mails in the wrong chronological
order. Is there a way to do this?
Wait...just checked and it appears to just go from t
On Wednesday, March 3, 2004 @ 9:34:15 AM [-0700], Daniel Rail wrote:
> Use Ctrl-LeftArrow instead.
Oh. Nevermind.
--
Matt
Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Saturday, March 6, 2004 @ 5:02:04 PM [-0700], Peter Meyns wrote:
> hit my ignore-thread button.
Wait, what "ignore-thread" button??? I want one! Or is this the
method that Miguel uses?
--
Matt
Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' inform
On Monday, March 22, 2004 @ 7:55:38 AM [-0700], Gerard wrote:
> It Is Time To Quit When... When you call fore on a par three everyone runs
> to the green for safety.
Hah! Almost lost my coffee reading that tagline...
--
Matt
Current version is
On Saturday, March 27, 2004 @ 9:35:52 AM [-0700], Miles Johnson wrote:
> I recently did a simple search for someone's email address in my 10+
> accounts. I was ASTONISHED to find out that Ritlabs has apparently removed
> the option for searching not only anywhere in the message but ACROSS ALL
> A
Hi,
I often use F4 to reply quoting selected text. Is there a shortcut to
Reply-to-All quoting selected text? I have a feeling it's right there
in front of me but I'm just not finding it.
--
Regards,
Matt
Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL
Argh! Why must the connection centre "stick" open on the IMAP
accounts? I have it set to open automatically, but it does not close
if there's an open IMAP connection. Is there any way to fix this?
--
Regards,
Matt
Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Us
On Friday, April 23, 2004 @ 1:08:25 AM [-0700], Martin Webster wrote:
MT>> Argh! Why must the connection centre "stick" open on the IMAP
MT>> accounts? I have it set to open automatically, but it does not close
MT>> if there's an open IMAP connection. Is there any way to fix this?
> Open Account
Hi,
Not sure if it's my mail server or the list...anyone out there? I
haven't seen anything come in since 2:30am PST...
--
Regards,
Matt
Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Thursday, July 22, 2004 @ 4:51:57 AM [-0700], Darrin Rich wrote:
RF>> It worked! I see you. :grin:
> Thats just soo cool :Thumbup:
I'm sorry to ask what will probably be a stupid question but where can
I download the latest rogue picture files? I have the X-Rogue header
added to my headers b
Hi,
How do I turn off the feature that automatically adds addresses to my
address book?
--
Regards,
Matt
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Monday, August 23, 2004 @ 12:25:18 PM [-0700], Zonnet wrote:
> That is not a feature of TB! but can be achieved by creating a special
> filter. You either have done this yourself (by axident ?) or someone is
> playing a trick on you.
> Look under the action tab in your filters if there is a ti
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 @ 6:40:29 AM [-0700], Rick Friedman wrote:
> Have you actually seen these addresses in your address book? Or are you
> assuming they are there because they are auto-completed when you start
> entering them in the address line of an e-mail?
They are definitely in the ad
On Wednesday, August 25, 2004 @ 1:15:18 AM [-0700], Thorvald Neumann wrote:
> Are you sure you are using TB?
Of course...since about January of 2002. I installed and never looked
back!
> I never experienced this with TB (I am using it now for nearly half a decade).
Yes, me neither. Just an odd
On Wednesday, August 25, 2004 @ 3:32:03 PM [-0700], MAU wrote:
> I don't use XP, but in a daily security newsletter I get they recommend
> delaying (or blocking) the installation of SP2 because some applications
> may cease to work.
> ,- [ This is a quotation from an IT admin ]
> | Please c
Hi,
I am running the latest (3.0) and have something very strange
happening. I'm not sure how to explain it other than giving an example
here...
As an example, I have 5 unread messages waiting to be read in my "Bat"
folder (automatically filtered from my inbox). I click on the first
unread messag
On Thursday, September 2, 2004 @ 12:51:35 PM [-0700], Zeynel A. Öztürk wrote:
> Stupid question maybe, but do you possibly have any "read messages"
> filter that interfering with TBUDL messages?
Actually, an excellent question and it's the correct one! I have no
idea how it got there but I in fac
Now this is frustrating as hell...
I convinced a long time user of Eudora to switch to The Bat 30 days
ago. He loves it. His trial expired, he went to ritlabs.com and
purchased the product, and was sent an email with his new registration
key.
He can't see it!
His trial is up so all he sees is th
On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 @ 4:44:55 PM [-0700], Michael L. Wilson wrote:
MT>> Help!
> Every ISP I know offers their mail on the web as well as download.
> Have the person go to their webmail.
I AM his ISP and we allow our users to delete from server if they want
to (saves me disk space anywa
Hello everyone...
I know that Marck keeps a great library of templates, macros, and some
filters...but I think there may be some other very cool filters out
there that are not on his site. I feel like I'm not taking full
advantage of how powerful the filtering is with TB.
I'd like this to be a "r
On Thursday, December 9, 2004 @ 2:09:42 PM [-0700], Andrew wrote:
> Where is that site, btw, please?
I was referring to this one...
http://cgi.marck.free-online.co.uk/library.php
--
Matt
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
On Thursday, December 16, 2004 @ 4:15:47 PM [-0700], Roelof Otten wrote:
> Two options come to mind.
> 1) It isn't an incoming filter
> 2) It isn't triggered, because another filter gets triggered by the
> message first.
It is an incoming filter, and I moved it to the top of the filter list
just
On Friday, December 17, 2004 @ 3:24:46 AM [-0700], Thorvald Neumann wrote:
> I tested your filter as an incoming filter on my system and it worked
> and moved the message into the right folder.
Hmmm...ok, we'll just have to swap computers.
Strange how it's not working for me...oh well...another
Hi,
I have created, deleted, tinkered with, and re-created the below
filter. For whatever reason, it never works when mail arrives.
However, it works fine if I re-filter the folder. Can anyone see
anything that I may be missing? The filter is very basic, it just
lookes for a word in the subject li
On Monday, March 28, 2005 @ 5:58:04 AM [-0700], Allie Martin wrote:
> This why the search dialog just sits
> there claiming the search was done and no matches found. You wait and
> then the matches suddenly appear.
Ugh. This is such a bad "feature". I don't know how many times I've
closed down t
Finally am seeing AV's on the latest beta. They're so bad that I can't
even open TB!...
I try to launch TB!, it partially opens, I get about 7-10 "Send the
debug to Microsoft" messages until finally I see the attached .png.
--
Matt
Current vers
On Friday, June 3, 2005 @ 10:36:28 AM [-0700], Allie Martin wrote:
>> I try to launch TB!, it partially opens, I get about 7-10 "Send the
>> debug to Microsoft" messages until finally I see the attached .png.
> What attached PNG? :)
Oops...had to use Thunderbird for this email and was all messe
Hello Marck,
Monday, January 16, 2006, 7:13:06 AM, you wrote:
RD>> How do many of you keep track of threads where you have replied and
RD>> would be looking for another person to reply to you?
> I use an "About me" colour group to colour red all threads I'm
> involved in.
Marck, can you elabora
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002 @ 4:11:18 AM [-0700], Ravindra Maharaj wrote:
>> BK> Any word on the above? I wanna transparent mail ticker and I wan't
>> BK> one now! ;)
>>
> You can also try this:
> http://www.veridicus.com/tummy/programming/powermenu/
One more option...
http://www.ishiboo
Hi,
I know this has been brought up before but couldn't find a definitive
answer in the archives...Marck/Allie...do you know if the powers that be
are working on an "ignore thread" option for 2.0?
--
Regards,
Matt
Current version is 1.61 | "Usi
On Friday, October 18, 2002 @ 12:53:12 PM [-0700], Vishal Nakra wrote:
> When I try to send emails, I sometimes get an error message saying -
> Server reply: relaying denied? This seems to be happening only
> recently since I got my broadband connection (Ethernet connection via
> T1/ATM to campus
On Friday, October 18, 2002 @ 10:28:13 AM [-0700], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> When I try to send emails, I sometimes get an error message saying -
>> Server reply: relaying denied? This seems to be happening only
>> recently since I got my broadband connection (Ethernet connection via
>> T1/ATM to
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003 @ 7:45:52 AM [-0700], Markus Gloede wrote:
> (BTW I encountered the double-space-after-periods discussion only in
> English speaking groups. It has never occurred in German discussion
> groups. Apparently it originated only in English typography style
> guides.)
Wai
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003 @ 7:11:56 AM [-0700], Andy Holt wrote:
> 2. (for ex-Outlook 2000 users) Being honest, are there any things that
> OL 2000 does that you cannot do in TB!, that you miss?
Johnathan and Marck have answered your other questions but I wanted to
touch on this one. I used O
On Saturday, January 18, 2003 @ 4:37:09 AM [-0700], Victor B. Gonzalez wrote:
> I bet my life if an RTF editor was introduced to The Bat!
> you might say I'll never use it (yeah, right) but you
> will. You have too... plain text is robotic and you'll use
> the bold and italic command sooner
On Thursday, January 30, 2003 @ 11:36:32 AM [-0700], Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
BH>> the lack of ability to add all recipients seems to be a big
BH>> hole.
> Simple - create a manual filter with the action "Add address to
> address book" and select "All To + CC + BCC". Then execute the
> filter on
On Thursday, January 30, 2003 @ 11:47:56 AM [-0700], Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
>> This is great, but how can you apply a filter to just one message?
>> I have a feeling this is an easy one...
> Make it manual and assign it a hotkey. Press the hotkey. #TaDa#.
> Magic!
Marck, or any filter guru, I
On Thursday, January 30, 2003 @ 6:16:43 PM [-0700], Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
>> Marck, or any filter guru, I'm still having trouble with this. How
>> can I have a filter take care of this without having it "move" the
>> message? There's no option to just leave the message where it is.
> Any filt
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 @ 1:23:12 PM [-0700], John Morse wrote:
> Just curious if anyone here has tried Foxmail 4.1 ?
> I'm looking for another E-mail client, as I just find "theBat!" too awkward.
> I hate that strange behaviours that it has, it is always so unpredictable.
> Foxmail seems like
On Thursday, March 13, 2003 @ 2:44:14 AM [-0700], ctrl-alt-delete wrote:
> see how TheBat! is doing in this poll
> and cast your vote
> http://www.techconnect.ws/modules.php?name=Surveys&pollID=21
Can that page have any more popup adds? Please?
--
Matt
___
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003 @ 7:07:06 AM [-0700], Miguel A. Urech wrote:
> I have an Ignore filter that does all you want and I have developed a
> PowerPro macro (script) to "easily" ignore threads and add them to the
> filter. If you can wait, give me some time (maybe tonight) and I will
> post det
On Thursday, May 29, 2003 @ 2:08:18 PM [-0700], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wrote to TheBat's support but while I am finding out what goes wrong
> I would like to know if there is a way to disable the Alt + F2 key
> combination except chopping off my left hand ?
Can you not go to View-Edit S
On Friday, June 13, 2003 @ 10:16:49 AM [-0700], Mike Apsey wrote:
> And my e-mail address has just been compromised as I discuss spam
> eradication methods with the TB! list?
> Lovely. Just lovely. That's what I get.
> Is it any wonder I cast broad and all-encompassing nets? Is it any
> wonder
On Monday, July 7, 2003 @ 11:37:31 AM [-0700], Mark wrote:
> Yes but that's 4 steps and 8 keys to press {F9}, ^A, ^C, and then
> Alt-F4 to close that window. I copy about 30 emails/day using this
> method, and it's a slight hassle. Would seem to be simple to
> implement using just edit copy on the
On Monday, July 21, 2003 @ 11:01:52 AM [-0700], Auke Beerschoten wrote:
> I've asked several times to be removed/unsubscribed
> from the mailing list, but I keep receiving mail anyway.
> They'll all be deleted unread from the server, and this
> autoresponse will be sent until my name is removed.
On Monday, July 21, 2003 @ 11:59:08 AM [-0700], Scrat wrote:
> How many times it this person going to send this! I've counted at least 6 -
> 8 times now.
He has it set to auto-reply to the TBUDL list so every message we send,
he replies. A HORRIBLE way to solve a problem that he could so easily
t
On Saturday, August 16, 2003 @ 2:04:09 PM [-0700], Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
> Yes. Version 2 is currently in early beta.
Hi Marck, I apologize for kinda hijacking this thread...I actually just
upgraded to the beta 2 and my reg key stopped working. Are they starting
to charge a new fee from this
Hi,
I'm having a little problem with one of my inboxen. When a new message
arrives, I'll click on the folder, and it'll take anywhere from 15 to 90
seconds to display it. Is it safe to delete the .tbi for that folder and
re-read it?
--
Regards,
Matt
On Friday, September 5, 2003 @ 10:36:26 AM [-0700], Roelof Otten wrote:
MT>> I'm having a little problem with one of my inboxen. When a new message
MT>> arrives, I'll click on the folder, and it'll take anywhere from 15 to 90
MT>> seconds to display it. Is it safe to delete the .tbi for that folde
On Friday, September 5, 2003 @ 11:36:37 AM [-0700], Roelof Otten wrote:
> In that case deleting the .tbi might help.
I did this after your first reply and it indeed fixed the problem.
Thanks.
--
Matt
Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" info
On Sunday, September 7, 2003 @ 8:10:22 AM [-0700], Günter Minnerup wrote:
> Since installing V2, the system try icon is no longer animated when there's unread
> mail - I'm sure
> the bat used to flap in V1.62.
> Is there a new setting somewhere in V2 which I need to adjust to get back that
> use
On Monday, September 8, 2003 @ 9:59:43 PM [-0700], John Phillips wrote:
>> Options / Preferences / Display Connection Center / choose "Always"
> Thanks for the tip, but can't seem to find that in 2.00.6
I have it...
It's not in the "tree" area along the left. This option is one of two
pull-do
On Monday, September 8, 2003 @ 10:55:07 PM [-0700], Neal Laugman wrote:
> I haven't found a way to turn off the tool tips in the message window.
> These tool tips show message counts for the folder and can be
> annoying. Can they be turned off?
If you mean the columns that show the unread and to
On Friday, September 12, 2003 @ 4:18:12 PM [-0700], P.Johnson wrote:
> I just changed my OS and have The Bat happily up and running again
> after a few headaches), but now the source info shows in the message
> pane. I can't seem to find where in the options to change this. Can
> someone please di
Hi,
Due to time and space issues, I was unable to do an official backup of
my mail folders/files. I have installed a new hard drive, with the old
drive as a slave. Copying over the folders for each account seems to
have worked ok but I get the occasional error stating that it can't
find C:\Program
On Monday, September 22, 2003 @ 12:46:45 AM [-0700], Martin Webster wrote:
> You didn't say if you've reinstalled TB! and then copied the mail
> folders across. Or if you copied the program and registry and left the
> mail folders because of space limitations. Anyway, the settings you
> refer to a
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003 @ 8:51:42 PM [-0700], Michael L. Cusac wrote:
> In Options|Preferences|General, I have checked 'Display MenuNavigator
> Button on the Caption Bar' yet I do not see the MenuNavigator Button.
> Once upon a time, it was visible, but I accidentally got rid of it.
> Where
On Friday, October 10, 2003 @ 8:46:27 AM [-0700], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> it saves you manually running your mouth through all the menus trying to
> ^
> Have you checked out Voice Recognition software? If so, you wou
On Saturday, November 22, 2003 @ 5:20:23 AM [-0700], Carsten Thönges wrote:
> Both X-Mailer and User-Agent are used to identify the software
> responsible for sending (at least The Bat! looks at both
> headers). So why not suppress the standard X-Mailer, define a
> User-Agent header and fill it wi
Hi,
I'm still having trouble with something I asked about a few months ago
(mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Giving it one more try...
Something within The Bat! is referencing a no longer existing "c:"
drive and I am going crazy trying to find what it is that points to
this. I've even used unix-like grep
On Tuesday, December 2, 2003 @ 8:30:04 AM [-0700], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> -Tools-Backup - Selected every option
> Didn't use that at all. Instead, I zipped the whole The Bat!
> directory, including the Mail subdirectory, to another location.
Thanks Thomas...
This is where I'm concerned. My
On Tuesday, December 2, 2003 @ 8:30:04 AM [-0700], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> -Tools-Backup - Selected every option
> Didn't use that at all. Instead, I zipped the whole The Bat!
> directory, including the Mail subdirectory, to another location.
Thanks Thomas...
This is where I'm concerned. My
On Tuesday, December 2, 2003 @ 2:06:32 PM [-0700], Simon Fincham wrote:
> Pocomail
Please don't take this the wrong way...I'm just curious. Why are we
having discussions about Pocomail's capabilities on The Bat! mailing
list? Simon/Tony/others...do you guys use TB AND Pocomail?
Again...just curio
Quick question...couldn't find it in the archives...
I would like to use a different character than ">" when quoting
replies. Can I do it with TB?
--
Regards,
Matt
Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscri
On Saturday, April 6, 2002, 6:37:43 PM, you wrote:
> Good morning Matt,
> It was foretold that on 7-4-2002 @ 18:24:22 GMT-0800 (which was 4:24
> where I live) Matt Thoene wrote and spread these wise comments on
> "Dutch lang. interf. / Bug.":
>
MT>>
> Good morning Luc,
> It was foretold that on 7-4-2002 @ 05:10:42 GMT+0200 (which was 5:10
> where I live) Luc wrote and spread these wise comments on
> "quotestyles":
>
L>> I have set it up like this:
L>> %QUOTESTYLE="=-|"
L>> %QUOTES
> You may probably have to indent the %Quotes macro
Hi,
I did an archive search and found only a few references to this from a few years
ago...Can you turn off the confirmation box that comes up when you mark
a message, or group of messages, as read? Not sure if this is available now in
the newest version.
--
Regards,
Matt
On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, 2:56:20 AM, John Phillips wrote:
> Hello Matt
> You wrote On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, at 00:06:40 [GMT -0700] (17:06 Wednesday where I
>live):-
>> Can you turn off the confirmation box that comes up when you mark
>> a message, or group of messages, as read?
> Is this wh
On Friday, April 12, 2002, 9:19:27 AM, Claude Renaud wrote:
> Could somebody tell me where I will be able to download the
> 1.60D version of the bat ! I can not find it neither on the
> ftp ritlabs site nor on their website.
I'm pretty sure the "1.60d" is the "SecureBat!"
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 5:40:57 AM, Dave Conroy wrote:
> Very curious ... I have installed the latest version '1.60g' TB! and
> since then I have had 5 messages to different people come back with
> the following basic message, for example:
> From: "System Administrator"
> To: <[EMAIL PRO
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 10:24:19 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> I've to correct that statement, albeit the 'guess' seems logical it can't
> be correct in this case, because:
> If he'd be using / contacting a mail server that does not allow relaying from
> his IP address he'd not even be a
On Friday, April 26, 2002, 12:08:55 AM, Lynna Lunsford wrote:
> Installed and working! The Bat! version "g".
Anything new and exciting with the g version?
--
Regards,
Mattmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current V
On Friday, April 26, 2002, 10:43:19 AM, Melissa Reese wrote:
> On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 9:45:43 AM PST, Gene Gough wrote:
>> Just that "h" is available on the beta site.
> Or that "h" is now available on the public release site. :-)
So, what is better about "g", "h", etc. than the curre
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 10:45:48 PM, Lynna Lunsford wrote:
> I purposefully searched for a different email client to get
> away from OE or MS Outlook 2000 of which I had both
> installed on my system (still do) but I was extremely
> dis-satisifed with the security problems, lock-ups, and
> m
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:02:00 PM, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
> Ever since 1.60h, after every power-cycle, all registry entries for The Bat
> are gone. All mail is gone, all folders are gone. I deleted everything
> and went back to 1.60c, and the same thing occurs. Therefore, I am,
> del
On Tuesday, May 14, 2002, 12:15:26 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I looked under Specials-create Filter, and also under
> Account-Sorting/office filters and didn't see an Actions tab... what
> am I missing?
Under Account-Sorting/Office filters, you should see a list that has
Incoming Mail, Outgoi
On Thursday, May 16, 2002, 4:23:52 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
> Today I received and installed the latest version of AbacusBat!
Abacusbat? Is The Bat! being repackaged and sold through another vendor?
--
Matt
Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ
On Friday, May 17, 2002, 11:01:24 PM, Peter Chiou wrote:
> Your date looks very interesting... what time machine are
> you using? :-)
Oh you should see it from here! Not sure how that happened...I believe
it's repaired now. Thanks for the heads up.
--
Regards,
Matt
On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 12:14:04 PM, Csaba Kiss wrote:
CK>>> funny cookies
= oxymoron. Although a few on this list do have some good ones from
time to time...
--
Regards,
Mattmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cu
On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 2:29:54 PM, Allie C Martin wrote:
PC>> you didn't answer the question about 160M info, what's new ??
> I have no idea. :-(
I'm running 1.60c and it's working flawlessly. I'm not missing anything
cool like holograms or superduper improved filtering capabilities am I?
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 10:33:29 PM, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>> > I dare say if the developers removed it, it'd knock the exe size down by
>> > maybe 50kb... hardly bloat seeing the size out Outlook Express' exe
>> > file...
>>
>> You are comparing apples and oranges... an Editor feature t
On Thursday, May 23, 2002, 8:37:03 AM, Britt Malka wrote:
DAC>> it supports it here. I just typed www.xxx.yyy in smart bat and it
DAC>> turned into a hyperlink
> It works here too :-)
It did? I tested as well, and it looks like a hyperlink, but in reality
doesn't do anything when clicked/doubl
On Tuesday, May 28, 2002, 3:24:24 PM, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>> This would mean I could play games online without lag spikes (due to
>> mail being checked in background) but I wouldnt have to shut TB down.
> It'd just be as easy to close TB!. Surely it doesn't take that long
> to load to caus
On Tuesday, May 28, 2002, 4:03:10 PM, Miguel A. Urech wrote:
> Oh come on guys, be serious! What other programs do you use in your
> PC, MS Word or Excel perhaps, a browser, a contact manager, a DB, a
> CAD program? Do you have them all open as soon as you start your PC
> and then just "suspend"
On Thursday, June 13, 2002, 10:36:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, about a zillion years ago I was in here complaining about
>wanting built-in smtp for TB. Tonight I had a straggler email come
>in from Ritlabs that was apparently sent a while ago, because it
>was announcing a ne
Hi Brook,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, at 08:24:44 [GMT -0700] (8:24 AM pst) you wrote:
> Will it ever happen? I've been using linux for many years and the only windows
> box I have collects more and more dust. I have paid for the bat but it bairly
> gets any use anymore.
Have you ever messed with
Caught this thread on spamassassin. The Bat will thankfully NOT be
labeled as "ratware".
--
Matt
This is a forwarded message
From: Steve Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, August 12, 2002, 1:06:50 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?
===8<==
On Monday, August 12, 2002 @ 7:27:17 PM [-0700], Thomas F. wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:30:56 -0700 GMT (13/08/02, 05:30 +0700 GMT),
> Matt Thoene wrote:
MT>> Caught this thread on spamassassin. The Bat will thankfully NOT be
MT>> labeled as "ratware".
> Ho
Hello Roelof,
Friday, February 3, 2006, 12:02:18 PM, you wrote:
MB>> I seem to remember that there's a way to get this annoying box (it
MB>> obscures whatever message listing happens to fall in its space) to
MB>> hide itself. But I can't find it.
> View -> Toolbars -> Quicksearch
> Or drag it
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, March 15, 2006, 11:20:42 AM, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a quick question regarding server settings for IMAP. I have
> recently moved from Outlook 2003 to TB against an IMAP account on
> Exchange server. When I am away from the office I access the server
> remotely witho
Hello Paul,
Thursday, March 16, 2006, 10:39:21 AM, you wrote:
>> Is it just me or are Paul's emails coming in unwrapped?
> I think you're right, however I am at a loss as to why this would be the
> case. Does this one wrap okay?
I left it as is...still a little wide.
If you go to Options-Pref
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
