Hello Kevin,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 you wrote:
Which method is preferred (ie: politically correct) when replying to a
thread, keeping the Re: or stripping it?
Personally I prefer keeping RE: because it makes it easier to delete
additions to threads that I have previously deleted because I have
On Tuesday, 24 June 2003, Allie Martin wrote:
RA For example if the subject of the original message was Fwd: test,
RA then the %OSubj macro in a reply or forward template using that
RA original returns : test.
AM .. as it should.
No it shouldn't. I just tested and Re: test is correctly changed
Allie
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, 3:25:47 PM, you wrote:
RA For example if the subject of the original message was Fwd: test,
RA then the %OSubj macro in a reply or forward template using that
RA original returns : test.
.. as it should. From the help:
,- [ %OSubj ]
| OSUBJ (replies
On Tue 24-Jun-03 3:41am -0400, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 June 2003, Allie Martin wrote:
RA For example if the subject of the original message was Fwd: test,
RA then the %OSubj macro in a reply or forward template using that
RA original returns : test.
AM .. as it should.
No it shouldn't. I
TBUDL members
I have just noticed strange behaviour of the %OSubj macro on my
system. If I have an email with a subject beginning with fwd: and
then reply or forward that email, the %OSubj macro returns the
original subject without the first three characters.
For example if the subject of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin Anson, [RA] wrote:
RA For example if the subject of the original message was Fwd: test,
RA then the %OSubj macro in a reply or forward template using that
RA original returns : test.
.. as it should. From the help:
,- [ %OSubj ]
| OSUBJ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Allie,
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 at 00:25 GMT -0500, Allie Martin [AM] wrote
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
AM you wish the Fwd to be preserved, then you need to use the
AM %OFullSubject macro.
Which method is preferred (ie: politically correct)
7 matches
Mail list logo
