Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

2003-02-22 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Thomas, On 22-02-2003 13:43, you [T] wrote in : T> What if a TBUDL member from these countries sends a posting? I used T> to live in Taiwan, and one TBUDL member never received my postings, T> because he deleted all incoming mails with the .tw TLD. ;-) If it goes through th

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

2003-02-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 11:10:18 +0100 GMT (22/02/03, 17:10 +0700 GMT), Peter Fjelsten wrote: > In my view, SpamCop is too hard. Actually, banning Korean and Chinese > IPs get me a long way (I don't know anyone there). What if a TBUDL member from these countries sends a posting? I used

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

2003-02-22 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Allie, On 22-02-2003 01:06, you [A] wrote in : A> In , A> Peter Fjelsten [PF] wrote:' PF>> Actually, I only get false negatives with Bayesian and no false PF>> positives with blacklists. A> No false positives with BlackLists? Wow! :) Nevertheles

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

2003-02-21 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Peter Fjelsten [PF] wrote:' PF> Actually, I only get false negatives with Bayesian and no false PF> positives with blacklists. No false positives with BlackLists? Wow! :) PF> What is the basis of your statement?

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

2003-02-21 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Allie, On 21-02-2003 23:52, you [A] wrote in : A> It would seem that he created a TB! filter to send an auto-reply A> to for all messages containing the 'X-Spampal: Spam' header. A> Not a good idea at all since there are a lot of false positives A> when u

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

2003-02-21 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Allie Martin [AM] wrote:' AM> A lot of messages from you starting with the quoted text above is AM> reaching TBUDL. Because of this, I've had to change your AM> subscription to 'moderated'. I haven't unsubscribed you. I've

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

2003-02-21 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Frank Nijkamp [FN] wrote:' FN> Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised FN> as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without FN> altering the subject. A lot of messages f

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

2003-02-21 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Dg Raftery Sr. [DRS] wrote:' DRS> Obviously you are having a problem with Spampal and I highly DRS> suggest that you correct it! It would seem that he created a TB! filter to send an auto-reply to for all message

Re[2]: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

2003-02-21 Thread DG Raftery Sr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday, February 21, 2003 5:37:31 PM RE: "**SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI" Greetings Frank, On Friday, February 21, 2003, 2:04:02 PM, you wrote: FN> Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised FN> as

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

2003-02-21 Thread Frank Nijkamp
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without altering the subject. On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 10:16 you wrote subject: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and