Hi!
I experienced the similar problems running The Bat! 1.60m,
with Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
When going New Message - TO: - History I got two error messages
Address violation at address in module 'comctl32.dll'.
and
second in module 'user32.dll'
While trying to enter an
Hi!
On Thursday, May 30, 2002, 2:22:25 PM, you wrote:
I think due to the number of times this is coming up... might this not
be a good idea to submit as a bug?
I sent it as a bug report to RitLabs. So we will see how soon they
will find a fix for it.
Vlad
On Thursday, May 30, 2002, Vlad Petrusevich wrote...
When going New Message - TO: - History I got two error messages
Address violation at address in module 'comctl32.dll'.
and second in module 'user32.dll'
While trying to enter an address not from address book I got a
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1-5-2002 at 0:45, Michael Disabato wrote:
H Nothing new in 1.60h. Just some bug-fixes.
RMR I guess they should list the bugfixes too, don't you?
How about the new bugs? :)
Like I said: nothing new. ;)
Haico
Current Ver: 1.60h
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60h
Windows XP
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 9:56 PM, you wrote:
ACM Yes. The S/MIME keys are different from the PGP keys. You have to go
ACM to a central authority and have them generate key pair/s for you. You
ACM can follow the tutorial found here
Hey syv,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60h) Educational
to write the following on Monday, April 29, 2002 at 5:36:49 PM.
s Hi tbudl,
s What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme
s file.
Check out the What's New link at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
on the edit personal certificates
JN tab and, if necessary, import your Thawte certificate.
JN JN
JN Allie C Martin wrote on Monday, April 29, 2002:
/ Paul
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe
On 30-4-2002 at 15:53, syv wrote:
Hi,
s What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme
s file.
TM Check out the What's New link at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
Did, and it shows what's new in 1.60 and 1.60c but I don't
see 1.60h.
Nothing new in 1.60h. Just some
El martes 30 de abril de 2002, a las 11.19, Haico decía:
Did, and it shows what's new in 1.60 and 1.60c but I don't
see 1.60h.
H Nothing new in 1.60h. Just some bug-fixes.
I guess they should list the bugfixes too, don't you?
--
Ricardo M. Reyes
(Mar del Plata - Argentina)
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 5:17:32 PM, Ricardo scribbled:
H Nothing new in 1.60h. Just some bug-fixes.
RMR I guess they should list the bugfixes too, don't you?
How about the new bugs? :)
Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
iQA/AwUBPM8i9j3ZlJQqDEkFEQKrpwCg/dHcFf1X9uGc33HFBo7CNdfKp1AAn0lm
dMWB41/fE8YEqYCMrAVfj6HJ
=377O
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
/ Paul
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ
and they open up just like
the other emails.
--
David Stone (UK) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! Version 1.60h. Platform Windows 98SE 4.10. Ver. A
I.E. version 5.50.4807.2300IC SP2
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http
Hello!
I've read about 1.60h here. One wrote that it would be much faster. So
I downloaded 1.60h, unpacked the whole contents of the_bat.exe with
WinRAR 3b7 into my TheBat-Folder and started it.
I found no speed improvements but found that most of the bodies of the messages
in my Send-Mail
I have 1.60h and I do not have any problem whatsoever with my 65.000
emails in several folders and 5 accounts.
To me, it seems people updgrading from betas into 1.60h is the source
problem. I upgraded from 1.60c release version, and to this moment I
have not run into any problem. Nor I have ever
Hello reclutamiento,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 6:44:06 PM, you wrote:
rsn I have 1.60h and I do not have any problem whatsoever with my 65.000
rsn emails in several folders and 5 accounts.
rsn To me, it seems people updgrading from betas into 1.60h is the source
rsn problem. I upgraded from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Melissa,
@29 April 2002, 09:49:53 -0700 (17:49 UK time) Melissa Reese wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I moved from 1.60 to 1.60h, I noticed that I could not open any
message that was signed using S/MIME.
... wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote:
...
When I installed 1.60c over 1.60h, all was back to normal.
MDP ... or you can switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME and all is back to
MDP normal.
Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote:
...
When I installed 1.60c over 1.60h, all was back to normal.
MDP ... or you can switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME and all is back to
MDP normal.
ACM Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out with
ACM
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 1:05:29 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
When I installed 1.60c over 1.60h, all was back to normal.
... or you can switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME and all is back to
normal.
I would submit that you shouldn't be forced to do that to read s/mime
messages
The Bat! 1.60h on Windows XP version 5,1
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List
Hi Allie,
@29 April 2002, 13:33:07 -0500 (19:33 UK time) Allie C Martin wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACM Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out
ACM with that option enabled.
I can view S/MIME signed messages alright. However, none of the sigs
IGNATURE-
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! 1.60 on Windows XP version 5,1
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto
E8A0Utfa/pLLdudvIJhma9iT
=g0/x
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBT
Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello reclutamiento,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 8:44:06 AM, you wrote:
reclutamiento I have 1.60h and I do not have any problem whatsoever with my 65.000
reclutamiento emails in several folders and 5 accounts.
reclutamiento To me, it seems people updgrading from betas into 1.60h is the source
Hello Melissa,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 8:49:53 AM, you wrote:
Reese When I moved from 1.60 to 1.60h, I noticed that I could not open any
Reese message that was signed using S/MIME. When I installed 1.60c over
Reese 1.60h, all was back to normal.
Reese Melissa
Is it possible that there is some
out
ACM with that option enabled.
This message showed as having a VALID signature when I
viewed it ( has the green icon ), my setting is on
Microsoft API.
--
Best regards,
Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60h
Wi
of inconsistencies
here in the different users experiences... But The Bat
version 1.60h is working okay for me.
--
Best regards,
Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60h
Windows XP
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE8za15V8nrYCsHF+IRAsreAJ4gR58M3N8y8qe/OU8LUtjHV3fRFACggzws
4/Swn0krvjo41ZjqD2REwtA=
=8bQJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
).
--
Best regards,
Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60h
Windows XP
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
PROTECTED]
1.60h
Windows XP
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60h
Windows XP
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL
ows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32)
iD4DBQE8zbS1OeQkq5KdzaARAlJwAJUZWVoOjZlCMT2E13nM1ehw4SI3AJ0Utuee
T0HLaDCrfsO9dXuujwmy1g==
=Bj6J
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current Ver: 1
Hi tbudl,
What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme
file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I just upgraded from 1.53 to 1.60h and find that I now cannot author
emails to people who are NOT in my address book already. What happens
is that the instant I type a letter into To, CC, or BCC that
makes it clear that the address is not one The Bat can fill in for me,
I get a series of a dozen
book. Incorrect and frustrating behavior
--
JN
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech
O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.60h on Windows XP version 5,1
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
-
iD8DBQE8zfEyV8nrYCsHF+IRAn/yAJ9yscgnxnIoCKZFrYFMawDj3l1QdQCeJiep
kOw9yChLnG4vLW3JCYEajSU=
=IkUl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http
Hello Melissa,
LL Monday, April 29, 2002, 8:49:53 AM, you wrote:
Reese When I moved from 1.60 to 1.60h, I noticed that I could not
open any
Reese message that was signed using S/MIME. When I installed 1.60c
over
Reese 1.60h, all was back to normal.
Reese Melissa
LL Is it possible
-
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not having any trouble with vanishing messages, but periodically
over the past couple of days, TB (1.60h) seems unable to connect to
the server after a while. This is quickly remedied by disconnecting
and dialing up again.
Never had this problem before 'h', however, and wonder if anyone
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE8zfe2V8nrYCsHF+IRArkKAKCE2gsVaym1x1QuT8iRFcZRwdZguACfWaJu
HDDbKMJwwZOdNId3J+fgBeI=
=DzUu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBPM34HdIjYUK2z54KEQIkgwCeNgKE8+rRAj+rOH9W9EPwkZz1ZXEAn3Y0
4Otp/HPAz0r6cz4h+iVxJ72O
=6I6q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http
UtArADesICXL/1zurSyOfCQ=
=TLg/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
keys. You have to go
to a central authority and have them generate key pair/s for you. You
can follow the tutorial found here http://www.mindquake.com.br/thebat/
to set yourself up with an S/MIME key pair in TB!
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ
Richard Evans
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 8:12:56 AM, you wrote:
I too had problems with h everytime I closed TB! it crashed and gave me an error
message. Now back on C and all happy again
Yes I also got the same errors when exiting the Bat 1.60h including an
Invalid page fault and a runtime
Hey TBUDL,
Wow, I am impressed (always have been, but more so now...)
I had not noticed TB! being slow, but I sure did notice a speed
increase after loading 1.60h! It used to take a few seconds on my P3
1.2Ghz processor, but now it is like .5 sec to load!
Other features are also
Hello,
Thought I'd try version 1.60h :)
However I find that email which have the small round yellow icon with
a tick over the envelope cannot be opened with 1.60h. I thought it
might be an old 'cannot view HTML email' problem I've had in the past.
When I reverted to 1.60c I found the email
I have the same problem. The message in this group from Michael
Disabato created at 3:12 PM today is not readable in 1.60h.
John Sands
-Original Message-
From: David Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002, 3:52:25 PM,
Subject: I cannot open email with yellow icon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 28, 2002, at 12:52:25 PM PST, David Stone wrote:
Is it me should I have done something ;)
1.60h has a bug that prevents you from opening S/MIME signed messages
(the little check mark icon signifies that the message was signed
Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen
Roel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zum Antworten bitte Lederhosen entfernen
* Speelplein Aboe http://www.aboe.zzn.com *
You're too drunk when...You don't recognize wife unless seen
through bottom of glass...
Using The Bat! 1.60h on Windows 2000
Hello John,
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 11:58:54 AM, you wrote:
Sands I have the same problem. The message in this group from Michael
Sands Disabato created at 3:12 PM today is not readable in 1.60h.
I have no problems reading the messages from this same person and I
am now using the h version
BAT 1.60H is out, at ritlabs site as of yesterday.
___
Running Bat v1.60h on Win2000Pro 5.00.2195 Service Pack 2 with Advanced
Direct Remailer v2.15, Mcaffe Online Engine Build 3217 4.1.60 DAT 4.0.4199
and Zone Alarm 3.0.118
57 matches
Mail list logo
