Hello Bat Folk.
There's been a fair amount of traffic on how to
automate a reply to SpamCop w TB! Maybe this will
help those who are having a problem with this
process.
First, from the SpamCop website @ URL are
instructions which you must follow.
,- [To register w SpamCop go to
Unfortunately, this method doesn't include HTML mail but only the ascii
interpretation; as such the HTML cannot be parsed which limits the
usefulness for Spamcop :-/
--Elwin
On Monday, January 14, 2002, 5:24:22 PM, Jan wrote:
> Hello Bat Folk.
> There's been a fair amount of traffic on how t
Hello Elwin.
At 3:40 AM on Tuesday, January 15, 2002 you wrote the
following about [Auto Responding to SpamCop]
Elwin> Unfortunately, this method doesn't include HTML
Elwin> mail but only the ascii interpretation; as such
Elwin> the HTML cannot be parsed which limits the
Elwin&g
Tuesday, January 15, 2002, 5:00:52 PM, Elwin Oost wrote:
> True, but for HTML spam (which most is) very important information is
> lost and thus only a fraction is reported. (see the warning Spamcop always
> gives for plaintexted HTML)
---
Am I missing something here? Following earlier discussio
Hello Elwin.
At 12:00 PM on Tuesday, January 15, 2002 you wrote the
following about [Auto Responding to SpamCop]
>> As for purely html msgs, there was a discussion a
>> while back, the bottom line of which, was that TB!
>> %HEADERS doesn't include what someone
Hello Geoff.
At 1:05 PM on Tuesday, January 15, 2002 you wrote the
following about [Auto Responding to SpamCop]
Geoff> Am I missing something here? [...] the plain
Geoff> text version of the message [...] is composed as
Geoff> a multi-part with the HTML attached. So far,
Geoff> Spam
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, 12:58:15 PM, Jan wrote:
> While your conclusion may be true, SpamCop accepts &
> processes the spam msgs I send them.
True, but for HTML spam (which most is) very important information is
lost and thus only a fraction is reported. (see the warning Spamcop always
7 matches
Mail list logo
