RE: IMAP - was Re: Digest (01/05/2000 12:18) Special Issue (#2000-171)

2000-01-06 Thread Rob
>I haven't tried it with services like AOL etc., but I do have an IMAP4 >account through www.subdimension.com (a free e-mail service, although >it isn't the most reliable.) > >IMAP works well enough on there. but do you use it as IMAP was 'supposed' to be used ; server-based ?? or do you just dow

IMAP - was Re: Digest (01/05/2000 12:18) Special Issue (#2000-171)

2000-01-05 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Flower12uk, I haven't tried it with services like AOL etc., but I do have an IMAP4 account through www.subdimension.com (a free e-mail service, although it isn't the most reliable.) IMAP works well enough on there. On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 at 05:08:19 [GMT EST], you wrote: Fac> Let me tackle

Re: Digest (01/05/2000 12:18) Special Issue (#2000-171)

2000-01-05 Thread Steve Lamb
Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 3:48:59 AM, Carsten wrote: CR>> And here we go (translation mode: quick'n'dirty...) CR>> "'The Bat! 1.22' CR>> The IMAP-implementation is a joke. As for a POP account The Bat! CR>> downloads all mails on the hard drive and deletes them from the CR>> server. That has

RE: Digest (01/05/2000 12:18) Special Issue (#2000-171)

2000-01-05 Thread Rob
>CR> "'The Bat! 1.22' >CR> The IMAP-implementation is a joke. As for a POP account The Bat! >CR> downloads all mails on the hard drive and deletes them from the >CR> server. That has nothing to do with server-based administration." > >*grin* Thanks, saves me having to look it up... And yes, I

Re[4]: Digest (01/05/2000 12:18) Special Issue (#2000-171)

2000-01-05 Thread Carsten Dreesbach
Hello Claudius, Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 12:33:18 PM, you wrote: CD>> I seem to remember a test the German c't (computer magazine) made here CD>> a few months ago. In that (if I remember correctly) they reported some CD>> difficulties with IMAP4 and the then-current version of TB!. CR>

Re[3]: Digest (01/05/2000 12:18) Special Issue (#2000-171)

2000-01-05 Thread Claudius Regn
Hello Carsten, CD> I seem to remember a test the German c't (computer magazine) made here CD> a few months ago. In that (if I remember correctly) they reported some CD> difficulties with IMAP4 and the then-current version of TB!. And here we go (translation mode: quick'n'dirty...) "'The Bat

Re[2]: Digest (01/05/2000 12:18) Special Issue (#2000-171)

2000-01-05 Thread Carsten Dreesbach
Hello Flower12uk, Wednesday, January 05, 2000, 6:08:19 AM, you wrote: Fac> TB! is supposed to be IMAP4 compatible, and I know that ppl have used Eudora Fac> and Outlook express to access aol mail but I want to be able to use the power Fac> of TB! As far as I can work out there's no reason why i

Re: Digest (01/05/2000 12:18) Special Issue (#2000-171)

2000-01-05 Thread Flower12uk
> Fac> I didn't find the help file that useful on IMAP4 the aol protocol, but I' > ve > Fac> got the imap server set-up etc but although the bat seems to get in and > check > Fac> mail boxes (in/sent) it doesn't download any email even when there are > new > Fac> email waiting. > > I