On Saturday 8 January 2000 Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> Parizh) and London (we pronounce it with two "o"s):-))
And that's probably not too far from the truth ;-)
John
--
you gave me something that i could touch in a world where i'd had too much
something i could feel with my broken hands full
Hi there!
On 8 Jan 00, at 14:07, Michael Heydekamp wrote
about "OT: Moldova":
> >> In any case, there are others guys in Moldavia that are looking at
> >> these issues themselves.
>
> AVK> Officially this country is called "Moldova" now. It was Moldavia
> AVK> when it was a part of USSR. Ju
Dear Alexander,
on Saturday, January 08, 2000, 00:01, you wrote:
>> In any case, there are others guys in Moldavia that are looking at
>> these issues themselves.
AVK> Officially this country is called "Moldova" now. It was Moldavia
AVK> when it was a part of USSR. Just in order to be precise:-
Hallo Nick,
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 23:24:09 -0800 GMT (08.01.2000, 15:24 +0800 GMT),
Nick Andriash wrote:
NA> Not only was that remark not warranted, and completely
NA> unsubstantiated, it certainly didn't belong on the List.
Point taken. My apologies to the list members.
--
Cheers,
Thomas
On Friday, January 07, 2000, 9:59:22 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> IOW, political comments have nothing to do in this list.
I agree Thomas... but with all due respect, you should heed your own
advice. That message should have been sent directly to Steve, as this one
is to you.
BTW, I'm a Canadi
Hallo Steve,
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:28:19 -0800 GMT (08.01.2000, 07:28 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
SL> Feh, any country over there that can't keep its name for more than 2
SL> decades should expect to be called all other names it has ever gone by in the
SL> past. ;P
SL> Same for citie
Hello Steve,
Written in response to your letter of Friday, January 07, 2000, 6:25:47 PM:
SL> Hey, lemme ask this, honestly. How many people saw me say that having the
SL> option to apply filters to all accounts would be a good thing? I bet not
SL> many.
I sure didn't, it was hard to read
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 21:31:39 -0500, Derek Cedillo wrote:
[..snip..]
> No, MicroSoft product *tells* you what you want. They never ask. 90%
> of the people I work with complain regularly about MS and how they
> added features that they never need. The difference here is, we are
> asking for featur
On Fri, 07 Jan 2000 16:34:30 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
[..snip..]
SL>> Furthermore, there is only so much that you can put into "options"
SL>> before people look at the options, get intimidated, and look
SL>> elsewhere. That is where multiple products come in.
> That's another valid point tha
Hello Steve,
Thanks for another arrogant reply, you must be proud.
Written in response to your letter of Friday, January 07, 2000, 2:03:38 PM:
SL> Friday, January 07, 2000, 10:36:54 AM, cid wrote:
>> Steve, although you offer "workable" solutions, there are easier ways
>> to deal with the The
Hi there!
On 7 Jan 00, at 15:28, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Enough already.":
> >> In any case, there are others guys in Moldavia that are looking at
> >> these issues themselves.
>
> > Officially this country is called "Moldova" now. It was Moldavia when it was a
> > part of USSR. Ju
Friday, January 07, 2000, 3:01:28 PM, Alexander wrote:
>> In any case, there are others guys in Moldavia that are looking at
>> these issues themselves.
> Officially this country is called "Moldova" now. It was Moldavia when it was a
> part of USSR. Just in order to be precise:-)
Feh, any c
Friday, January 07, 2000, 2:34:30 PM, Douglas wrote:
SL>> If you consider it a shortcoming then that is clearly a perception
SL>> issue and *IS* a problem between chair and keyboard.
> On whose end?
Theirs since many here have expressed that they do not consider it a
shortcoming.
SL>> Bully
Hi there!
On 7 Jan 00, at 16:34, Douglas Hinds wrote
about "Re[2]: Enough already (Was: Re: Peg":
> In any case, there are others guys in Moldavia that are looking at
> these issues themselves.
Officially this country is called "Moldova" now. It was Moldavia when it was a
part of USSR. Ju
Hello Steve & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 07, 2000, Steve unfortunately wrote:
SL> If you consider it a shortcoming then that is clearly a perception
SL> issue and *IS* a problem between chair and keyboard.
On whose end?
when "Cid" said:
>> You may not care to deal with mail fr
Hi there!
On 7 Jan 00, at 13:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about "Enough already...":
> I'm just a TB! newbie (yet a definite internet and email veteran) and
> I agree with Alex with all of this.
Thanx:-) I support the subject you've chosen for this message. I'm going to
abandon this thread
Friday, January 07, 2000, 10:36:54 AM, cid wrote:
> Steve, although you offer "workable" solutions, there are easier ways
> to deal with the The Bat!s shorcomings besides "what's between the
> chair and the keyboard", as you put it.
"Cid", what you, and Alex, are not understanding is that I
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:36:54 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..snip..]
> You may not care to deal with mail from multiple accounts as one, but
> some of us do. I don't want to redirect messages all over the place,
> bouncing them through my ISP or anywhere else for that matter. For
> example, I
I'm just a TB! newbie (yet a definite internet and email veteran) and
I agree with Alex with all of this.
Steve, although you offer "workable" solutions, there are easier ways
to deal with the The Bat!s shorcomings besides "what's between the
chair and the keyboard", as you put it.
You may not
19 matches
Mail list logo
