On Thursday, June 3, 2004, 11:09 AM, you wrote:
MLW> I downloaded the filters, got a free account at Spamcop and tried the
MLW> send filter. The email I was trying to send to spamcop was deleted.
MLW> I have tried a few other things, but just cannot get the spamcop
MLW> filters to do anyt
Hello Paul,
On Sun, 30 May 2004, at 08:17:07 [GMT-0400] (which was 05:17:07 In San
Jose, CA, USA) you wrote:
PC> Marck has 2 filters,
I downloaded the filters, got a free account at Spamcop and tried the
send filter. The email I was trying to send to spamcop was deleted.
I have tried a fe
On Sunday, May 30, 2004, 11:16 AM, you wrote:
j> If it "takes the reply" then you have to wait for it, no? Nevertheless, my
j> primary point is that using Spamcop is more time consuming that simply deleting
j> email off the server based on viewing the header (ala Mailwasher) and that (IMO)
j> an
Hello rich,
Sunday, May 30, 2004, 1:16:45 AM, rich gregory wrote:
rg> Hummm. Maybe we should all just pay .05 cents for each email we
rg> send...
I don't like that ideal either.
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v2.11 Beta/9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
"There
On Sunday, May 30, 2004, 8:17:07 AM, Paul Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PC> On Saturday, May 29, 2004, 11:22 PM, you wrote:
j>> ith a TB macro. It's much more time consuming that just deleting the offending
j>> messages as sending an email to Spamcop is only half the process. You must als
On Saturday, May 29, 2004, 11:22 PM, you wrote:
j> ith a TB macro. It's much more time consuming that just deleting the offending
j> messages as sending an email to Spamcop is only half the process. You must also
j> wait for an email link for each spam email that you sent to Spamcop, then go to
j
On Saturday, May 29, 2004, 2:34:23 PM, rich gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rg> Hello Batters!
rg> I know there exists a template/macro that will do the following but I never did
get it up and running.
rg> From an ad:
rg> Have you ever wished that you could return spam to its sender and fool
On Saturday, May 29, 2004, 2:34 PM, you wrote:
rg> I know there exists a template/macro that will do the following
rg> but I never did get it up and running.
rg> From an ad:
rg> Have you ever wished that you could return spam to its sender and fool
rg> them into thinking that your e-mail addres
Hello rich,
> I know that some high percentage of SPAMs come from invalid addresses
> so perhaps the entire project/cost is not worth the effort?
No, it is not worth the effort.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.10.03
_
9 matches
Mail list logo