Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Avram Sacks
Hi, Sudip. On 7/22/02 at 8:18 p.m. you wrote: I used ZA but after it started screwing things in TB!, I removed it. After much searching and many trials, I've come to settle on Agnitum Outpost Pro Firewall. Have no problem with it so far. There's also a freeware version available. Do you know

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Avram, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 01:59:56 -0500 GMT (Jul 31, 12:44 my local time), you [AS] wrote AS Do you know which version of ZA you used I don't specifically but I upgraded to the latest version (mid May I think) and still had problems. AS can you be a little more specific regarding what

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Erik Janssen
Hi Sudip, Avram, I use Zone Alarm Pro (as fas as I know the latest version) and do _not_ have any problems that I am aware of. My OS is Windows XP Professional and I am using McAfee Total Virus Defence with it (also without _any_ problems). What I do remember (you are also referring to that) is

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Erik, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:51:11 +0200 (MEST) GMT (31/07/02, 16:51 +0700 GMT), Erik Janssen wrote: EJ What I do remember (you are also referring to that) is some renaming EJ of attachments (the file extentions). When I disabled the Mail-Safe EJ settings everything worked fine at my

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, Thomas F. wrote... Pardon me for being ignorant, but was does this Mail-Safe function in ZA do? What I can figure from the list, it changes attachment names, so that they cannot be opened any more. May make sense for

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Erik Janssen
Hello Thomas, TF Pardon me for being ignorant, but was does this Mail-Safe function in TF ZA do? What I can figure from the list, it changes attachment names, TF so that they cannot be opened any more. May make sense for OE/OL TF users, but then, how do *they* open attachments at all? TF Is it

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread ETM
When using ZA, disabling Mail-Safe is essential to avoid the renaming of executable attachments. I have never had a problem renaming them so I could run an AV scan and then open them. Elaine Hello Erik On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, you wrote What I do remember (you are also referring to

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread ETM
It is a optional feature of ZA and does not have to be used. It changes the file extension to an easily-identified ZA file extension and the attachment can be renamed and opened. Simply unchecking the option eliminates the feature. Elaine Hello Thomas On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, you wrote

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Avram Sacks
Hi, Elaine. on 07/31/2002 at 04:24 PM you wrote: When using ZA, disabling Mail-Safe is essential to avoid the renaming of executable attachments. I have never had a problem renaming them so I could run an AV scan and then open them. If I understand you correctly, with ZA one must disable

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread ETM
Because I am using the free current version of ZA, it only offers mail protection against VBS attachments and it has never interfered with TheBat. When I was using Outlook Express, I used the paid version of ZA-Pro and it offered protection against 45 additional mail attachments (.exe, .com,

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Avram, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:50:28 -0500 GMT (Aug 01, 03:35 my local time), you [AS] wrote AS Isn't disabling the feature defeating the purpose of the firewall? If you have an AV package with up to date definition and its set up to scan incoming mail, this feature is absolutely redundant.

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Erik, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:54:59 +0200 (MEST) GMT (01/08/02, 03:54 +0700 GMT), Erik Janssen wrote: TF Is it the job of this firewall to make attachments useless? EJ According to the help-file of ZA it should do the following: EJ (sorry for the gigantic message!) We might have to move

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas F. [TF] wrote: TF We might have to move this to TBOT soon. But thanks for the info. . TF (Has ZoneLabs been bought by Microsoft, or why do they write such a TF nonsense?) moderator