Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam (and possible list serv alt)

2000-08-28 Thread Mark Aston
Hi Jamie, Sunday, August 27, 2000, 7:20:44 PM, you wrote: JD> Up in the grim North of England sarcasm is classed as the second JD> highest form of humour (first is northerners carrying pianos up JD> steps). It's very easy for a little sarcastic comment to seem JD> offensive

Re[2]: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam (and possible list serv alt)

2000-08-28 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Thomas, Saturday, August 26, 2000, 3:04:15 PM, you wrote: TF> Hallo A, TF> On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 08:19:53 -0500 GMT (26/08/2000, 21:19 +0800 GMT), TF> A . Curtis Martin wrote: ACM>> Is it the trouting or is it since the my appointment? ;-b ACM>> The list had a bad spell and everyone's war

Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo A, On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 08:19:53 -0500 GMT (26/08/2000, 21:19 +0800 GMT), A . Curtis Martin wrote: ACM> Is it the trouting or is it since the my appointment? ;-b ACM> The list had a bad spell and everyone's warming back up. In a few weeks ACM> we'll be needing a lot of trout. ;-b If you t

Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-26 Thread A . Curtis Martin
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 09:26:03 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: GB>> Oops, I think I see a trout being swung in my direction. MDP> I have noticed that since the introduction of trouting the list has MDP> become *so* much easier to moderate . Is it the trouting or is it since the my appointmen

Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-26 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gene, On 26 August 2000 at 20:55:01 GMT -0400 (which was 01:55 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of ": Re: TheBat and Spam": >>> - Filter rules for messages from news and other promo sites to >>> which

Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-25 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Friday, August 25, 2000, 4:58:27 PM, Allie wrote: > You seem to have a serious spam problem. For me about 10-20 spam > messages reach me per week. Not too much different from me. Out of literally hundreds of messages per day, 2 or 3 are spam. > Of all of them 1 wil

Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-25 Thread Gene Brown
On Friday, August 25, 2000, Steve wrote: > Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:55:20 -0700 > From: Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Thursday, August 24, 2000, 3:49:00 PM, A wrote: >&g

Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-25 Thread A . Curtis Martin
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:17:53 -0600, Keith Russell wrote: KR> Has anyone tried anything like this? What have been your KR> experiences? Suggestions? You seem to have a serious spam problem. For me about 10-20 spam messages reach me per week. Of all of them 1 will hit my inbox per month! That's h

Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-25 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday, August 24, 2000, 3:49:00 PM, A wrote: > - Filter rules for messages from news and other promo sites to which I > have subscribed. Pst. You misspelled "porno". :) - -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrin

Re[2]: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-25 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. I know there are other Pobox users on this list, and I'm curious to know whether anyone has expanded on the methods described by Allie and others, to incorporate sub-filtering of messages already prefiltered by Pobox. For those who haven't seen the way Pobox handles thi

Re[2]: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-24 Thread ztrader
I've been using the Spambouncer on a shell account for many years. It works VERY well! See http://www.spambouncer.org/ It comes in two parts, one is customized to fit personal stuff, and the other is a large program to do rather detailed filtering of spam. Anyone interested in what it takes to do

Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-24 Thread A . Curtis Martin
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:01:33 +1000, John Phillips wrote: JP> For the computer challenged amongst us (present company excepted of JP> course ), can you post a copy of these filters? Thanks. Kind of an impractical request but let me see if my illustration will make you better understand. For one t

Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-24 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello John, On Thu, 24 Aug 2000 at 17:01:33 [GMT +1000], you wrote: JP> Steve my Shrink, JP> For the computer challenged amongst us (present company excepted JP> of course ), can you post a copy of these filters? Thanks. How would he do that? It's filtering SPAM by exception, meaning that you

Re: Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-24 Thread John Phillips
Hello Monday, August 14, 2000, 5:50:58 PM, you wrote: SL> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- SL> Hash: SHA1 SL> Once again the question of effective filtering of spam has come up and SL> once again people have made suggestions which simply do not work. A "bozo SL> bin" doesn't work because

Fwd: Re: TheBat and Spam

2000-08-14 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Once again the question of effective filtering of spam has come up and once again people have made suggestions which simply do not work. A "bozo bin" doesn't work because spammers most likely move to a different address before you even check your