Re: More reliable email

2002-07-07 Thread tracer
Hello Roelof Otten, On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 00:30:53 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Monday, July 1, 2002, 5:30:53 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Roelof Otten wrote: Hallo Jonathan, On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 09:29:33 -0500GMT (30-6-02, 16:29 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: JA You can use

Re: More reliable email

2002-07-07 Thread tracer
Hello Jonathan Angliss, On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:10:46 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Monday, July 1, 2002, 7:10:46 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Jonathan Angliss wrote: What privacy matters? It reads a header, or a tag that says let me know when it hit the final server. I see no

Re[2]: More reliable email

2002-07-07 Thread Sergey Uvarov
Dear tracer, Sunday, July 7, 2002, 5:52:07 PM, you wrote: JA You can use delivery, and receipt confirmation, but only delivery JA is actually respoonded too all the time. Receipt confirmation can JA be skipped by the user. Only bad configured mailservers respond to delivery confirmation

Re: More reliable email

2002-07-07 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Sergey, On Sunday, July 7, 2002 at 6:26:29 PM you [SU] wrote (at least in part): SU Is there is a way to generate user unknown message not from server SU but from client side. Simple answer: No. More detailed: there were solutions described that end up in a less or more good imitation

More reliable email

2002-06-30 Thread utomo
I guess almost all of us at least once getting problem from non reliable email. We can have problem when sending email (to POP or WEBmail), and we did not sure if the email is delivered without problem or not. (Yes I know that we can set delivery receipt and read receipt), but many people did not

Re: More reliable email

2002-06-30 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi Utomo, On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 21:18:07 -0700, you wrote: I guess almost all of us at least once getting problem from non reliable email. Yep... or not at all. My old ISP in the UK are dropping mail all the time, with no explanation. We can have problem when sending email (to POP or

Re: More reliable email

2002-06-30 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jonathan, On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 09:29:33 -0500GMT (30-6-02, 16:29 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: JA You can use delivery, and receipt confirmation, but only delivery JA is actually respoonded too all the time. Receipt confirmation can JA be skipped by the user. Only bad configured

Re: More reliable email

2002-06-30 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi Roelof, On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 00:30:53 +0200, you wrote: Hallo Jonathan, On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 09:29:33 -0500GMT (30-6-02, 16:29 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: JA You can use delivery, and receipt confirmation, but only delivery JA is actually respoonded too all the time. Receipt

Re: More reliable email

2002-06-30 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jonathan, On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 17:39:59 -0500GMT (1-7-02, 0:39 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: Only bad configured mailservers respond to delivery confirmation requests and clients should not respond to them without a user confirmation. Why would you say a badly configured server?

Re: More reliable email

2002-06-30 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi Roelof, On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 01:14:36 +0200, you wrote: But what server should send it? Messages pass several servers. How does a server know that it's the last one in the line? If it sent the message further by smtp, it's not likely the last server, but it happens that messages pass