-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joseph,
@24 March 2002, 18:36:17 -0600 (00:36 UK time) Joseph N. wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> there might be a 'bis' version later
> I've seen that term used before. What does it mean?
Literally, it means "Second".
- -
Yuki Taga wrote on Friday, March 22, 2002:
> there might be a 'bis' version later
I've seen that term used before. What does it mean?
Current Ver: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Ignore that comment. I shut down, restarted TB, and the
Navigator now works/searches.
Elaine
Hello ETM
On Saturday, March 23, 2002, you wrote
> The menu block is on my TB but it doesn't respond to any search
> term. I am using Win98SE.
__
The menu block is on my TB but it doesn't respond to any search
term. I am using Win98SE.
Elaine
Hello Luc
On Saturday, March 23, 2002, you wrote
ACM>> The menu navigator was introduced as a means for users to help find
ACM>> their way among the many menus and items. It's like a menu item sea
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 21:18:00 GMT+0100 (which was 21:18
where I live) SyP wrote and spread these wise comments on "New 1.60
version: bug?":
S> mNewQT_QT_DEFB12FF -> it sounds like a Delphi component name, maybe
S> the mNewQt_Qt part is the classname and DEFB12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Luc,
You wrote on 3/23/2002, 12:59 AM:
Luc> after installing TB! 1.60 over my previous (1.53d) when i receive
Luc> mail and click on the appropriate folder i get the following error:
Luc> "a new component named mNewQT_QT_DEFB12FF already
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 07:57:12 GMT-0500 (which was 13:57
where I live) Allie C Martin wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version ! :-)":
ACM> The menu navigator was introduced as a means for users to help find
ACM> their way among the many menus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 06:19:00 -0600, Geordon Vantassle [GV] graced us
with these comments:
...
GV> Yes, yes, I've done so, however the readme.txt file has nothing to
GV> say about that. Neither does the "help" have anything about it.
GV> Granted, I mig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Friday, March 22, 2002 at 23:43:16 GMT -0500 (which was 10:43 PM
where I live), thus spake Allie C Martin on the subject of "New 1.60
version ! :-)":
GV>> Looks good! Now, can someone please tell me what the "menu
GV>
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 00:06:13 GMT-0500 (which was 6:06
where I live) Allie C Martin wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version: bug?":
ACM> Hmmm. Since using TB!, I've never gotten away with giving two QT's the
ACM> same handle. TB! woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 05:47:51 +0100, Luc [L] wrote these comments:
...
L> Actually, Nick, you did help me out: it was my QT's but it was a
L> strange thing: i had the precisely the same QT's and in the previous
L> version (obviously). One of them had t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 22:30:40 -0600 [ Fri, 22 Mar 2002], Geordon Vantassle [GV] contributed
this to our collective wisdom:
...
GV> Looks good! Now, can someone please tell me what the "menu
GV> navigator" is good for? Alternatively, where can I go to find out
GV> more a
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 20:21:55 GMT-0800 (which was 5:21
where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version: bug?":
NA> Sorry Luc... if your error doesn't exist within your existing QT's I don't
NA> know what to s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Friday, March 22, 2002 at 20:51:49 GMT +0100 (which was 1:51 PM
where I live), thus spake Eric Malausséna on the subject of "New
1.60 version ! :-)":
EM> Hi ,
EM> The Bat! 1.60 is released and available on the site :
EM> htt
Hello Luc,
On Friday, March 22 2002 at 07:46 PM PDT, you wrote:
> Well, i haven't detected anything strange with them, and why would
> they be acting this way after having them for a long time now without
> any problems?
I thought you mentioned that you had two copies of TB installed, but af
I can honestly say that I installed this version earlier today,
have worked with it all day, and while I am looking at different
menu placement, it has worked (after the initial lockup) without
one moment's problem. In that time I have probably downloaded
about 1,000 emails.
Now, on to play some
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 19:34:14 GMT-0800 (which was 4:34
where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version: bug?":
NA> I never used QT's but it sure sounds as if you have a Folder or Account
NA> Level Template that is som
Hello Luc,
On Friday, March 22 2002 at 05:26 PM PDT, you wrote:
> Nothing: did a search and came up with only the messages wherein the
> text comes up. Could this by some strange effect has to do with the
> fact that i have a backup of TB! in another folder and directory
> (made it before i inst
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 16:48:19 GMT-0800 (which was 1:48
where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version: bug?":
NA> No, but it may be filed that way for some reason. Try doing a search for
NA> it and see what you come up with.
Hello Luc,
On Friday, March 22 2002 at 04:42 PM PDT, you wrote:
> That was my first thought also, looking at the "QT" error, but i
> don't have a QT named that way.
No, but it may be filed that way for some reason. Try doing a search for
it and see what you come up with.
--
Nick Andriash
Co
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 16:30:08 GMT-0800 (which was 1:30
where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version: bug?":
Nick> This sounds more like a QT duplication error on your part than anything
Nick> else. Do you have a Quick Templ
Hello Luc,
On Friday, March 22 2002 at 03:59 PM PDT, you wrote:
> This occurs with some folders, but not with all of them.
>
> Is this a bug, has anyone else this problem...?
This sounds more like a QT duplication error on your part than anything
else. Do you have a Quick Template in use na
Hi list,
after installing TB! 1.60 over my previous (1.53d) when i receive
mail and click on the appropriate folder i get the following error:
"a new component named mNewQT_QT_DEFB12FF already exists". When i
click OK, i can open the folder without problems.
This occurs with some folde
Saturday, March 23, 2002, 5:57:25 AM, ETM wrote:
E> This is out of beta status, is that correct?
E> Elaine (who doesn't have the wits to be a beta tester)
>From the standpoint of 'you're not going to have any show-stopping
problems with your basic mail functions', I think it's out of beta,
and
Hello Charles!
On Friday, March 22, 2002 at 10:00:00 PM you wrote:
> Not sure, as I was using a beta version previous to this install. Sounds
> like they might want to re-visit the install routine. The betas were just
> exe file replacements. I'll await those more knowledgeable about The Bat to
It was foretold that on 22-3-2002 @ 22:34:38 GMT+0100 (which was 22:34
where I live) Ottar Grimstad wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version ! :-)":
Ottar> It picks up all of your settings - including registration information.
Ottar> Worked flawlessly for me.
Hello gvantass,
22. marec 2002, 21:28:57, you wrote:
> Does this mean that my recently-purchased registration key will or will NOT
> work for this new version?
Why shouldn't it? Mine works, and it's almost a year since I purchased
it.
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.s
Hello Luc,
Friday, March 22, 2002, 9:47:24 PM, you wrote to TBUDL:
L> Do you have to register again manually or does it pick up the
L> registration automatically?
It picks up all of your settings - including registration information.
Worked flawlessly for me.
--
Best regards,
Ottar Grimst
Friday, March 22, 2002, 9:00:41 PM, you wrote:
R> Hi John
R> On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 20:56:59 +GMT
R>(which was 22/03/2002, 21:56 +0100GMT for me),
R> you wrote:
JR>> Do I have the first bug or is this a feature? I launch The Bat from a
JR>> shortcut on the quicklaunch bar in XP Pro (using
It was foretold that on 22-3-2002 @ 21:00:00 GMT+ (which was 22:00
where I live) Charles Collinson wrote and spread these wise comments
on "New 1.60 version ! :-)":
CC> It might be worth deleting your old EXE file just before install -
CC> wild guess here for sure :
Hello ETM,
Friday, March 22, 2002, 9:57:25 PM, you wrote to TBUDL:
E> I also have the new "inbox" although it is empty.
Bat 1.6 comes with a new filter calles known. If you activate this
filter, it filters mail from senders that you have in your addressbook
into your Inbox - known. You can sele
On Friday, March 22, 2002, 22:15, you wrote:
> Is The Bat written in Delphi? We have a program at work that is, and
> it also has some strange behaviour when run via the quicklaunch bar
> in NT4.
Yes, Delphi 6.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 S
Luc,
Not sure, as I was using a beta version previous to this install. Sounds
like they might want to re-visit the install routine. The betas were just
exe file replacements. I'll await those more knowledgeable about The Bat to
respond. It might be worth deleting your old EXE file just before in
Hi John
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 20:56:59 +GMT
(which was 22/03/2002, 21:56 +0100GMT for me),
you wrote:
JR> Do I have the first bug or is this a feature? I launch The Bat from a
JR> shortcut on the quicklaunch bar in XP Pro (using 'classic' layout),
JR> with The Bat set to run maximised. When
Friday, March 22, 2002, 7:51:49 PM, you wrote:
EM> Hi ,
EM> The Bat! 1.60 is released and available on the site :
EM> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
Do I have the first bug or is this a feature? I launch The Bat from a
shortcut on the quicklaunch bar in XP Pro (using 'classic' la
I also have the new "inbox" although it is empty. I had a lockup
and don't know if it was connected to the installation of the new
version. I shut down and it appears to be okay now (with the new
inbox). My previous registration number is in the new version.
This is out of beta status, is that
Does this mean that my recently-purchased registration key will or will NOT
work for this new version?
>= Original Message From "Eric Malausséna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=
>Hi ,
>
>The Bat! 1.60 is released and available on the site :
>http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
>
>--
>Reg
Oh, good! Thank you for the clarification!
Much obliged!
>= Original Message From Charles Collinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=
>gvantass,
>
>Registration is as long as the 1.xx versions. So, yes, your registration will
>remain valid.
>
>Charles Collinson
_
It was foretold that on 22-3-2002 @ 20:38:19 GMT+ (which was 21:38
where I live) Charles Collinson wrote and spread these wise comments
on "New 1.60 version ! :-)":
CC> Registration is as long as the 1.xx versions. So, yes, your registration will
CC> remain valid.
gvantass,
Registration is as long as the 1.xx versions. So, yes, your registration will
remain valid.
Charles Collinson
Current Ver: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : ht
Hi ,
The Bat! 1.60 is released and available on the site :
http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
--
Regards,
Eric mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Current Ver:
41 matches
Mail list logo
