Hello Jonathan,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 9:33:08 AM, you wrote:
>> 2.) often you address is not listed in TO: field :-) (It is the case
>> for maillist - so you can make AB group of "allowed" recipients like
>> you address, TB UDL and others.)
JA> Which is why you create your filters in a partic
Hello Thomas,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 6:27:54 PM you [TF] wrote (at least in
part):
TF> I wonder by now whether chinanet or this other ISP in Brasil care...
For sure they don't. Unless these mails come to their mailboxes.
I do reject mails from servers listed in some black lists. The server
Hello Jonathan,
On 28 Jul 2002 10:38:50 -0500 GMT (28/07/02, 22:38 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>> >> 3.) often spam letters have "X-Authentication warning" in cludges
JA> I know how to show the headers/source ;) I'm just saying... I've never
JA> seen it in any of the spam I have got,
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 11:14, Sergey Uvarov wrote:
>
> JA> I know how to show the headers/source ;) I'm just saying... I've never
> JA> seen it in any of the spam I have got, and I often look at the headers
> JA> to make modifications on the mail server, to see if I can force a block
> JA> on that
Dear Jonathan,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 5:38:50 PM, you wrote:
JA> I know how to show the headers/source ;) I'm just saying... I've never
JA> seen it in any of the spam I have got, and I often look at the headers
JA> to make modifications on the mail server, to see if I can force a block
JA> on
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 09:41, Sergey Uvarov wrote:
>
> >> 3.) often spam letters have "X-Authentication warning" in cludges
>
> JA> I've never seen this header before in any of the same... how common is
> JA> if for you? I get nearly 70-160 spam a day.
>
> 8-). At my experience this string appea
Dear Jonathan,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:33:08 PM, you wrote:
JA> Which is why you create your filters in a particular order like this:
JA> 1 - High useage lists
JA> 2 - Other lists
JA> 3 - Common contacts
JA> 4 - Most other contacts
JA> 5 - Spam filter
Yes, something like this.
>> 3.) often s
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 09:09, Sergey Uvarov wrote:
>
> JS>>> I've been following the thread about anti-spam measures and I too wanted
> JS>>> to create a separate address book for spam addresses
>
> I do not think, that it is good idea. I have very few cases when spam
> address is the same.
Dear Joyce,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:56:28 PM, you wrote:
JS>>> I've been following the thread about anti-spam measures and I too wanted
JS>>> to create a separate address book for spam addresses
I do not think, that it is good idea. I have very few cases when spam
address is the same. Mo
9 matches
Mail list logo
