On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 09:09, Sergey Uvarov wrote: > > JS>>> I've been following the thread about anti-spam measures and I too wanted > JS>>> to create a separate address book for spam addresses > > I do not think, that it is good idea. I have very few cases when spam > address is the same. Most of spam have unique address. > Some hints: > 1.) spam letters often contains 4-5 digits in subject.
Most cases yes, or a large number of spaces before that, which would probably be easier to match on. > 2.) often you address is not listed in TO: field :-) (It is the case > for maillist - so you can make AB group of "allowed" recipients like > you address, TB UDL and others.) Which is why you create your filters in a particular order like this: 1 - High useage lists 2 - Other lists 3 - Common contacts 4 - Most other contacts 5 - Spam filter > 3.) often spam letters have "X-Authentication warning" in cludges I've never seen this header before in any of the same... how common is if for you? I get nearly 70-160 spam a day. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
