-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sam,
On 26 October 2001 at 07:35:06 [GMT-0500] (which was 13:35 where I
live) Sam wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
S> Perhaps there is a way to make the "1" tab default?
Options | Preferences | General | Display HTML part of mes
Hello Sam,
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 07:35:06 -0500 GMT (26/10/2001, 20:35 +0800 GMT),
Sam wrote:
S> I am wondering if there is a way to change the background color of a
S> message received in HTML.
I think the background colour is sent with the message.
S> I can click on the "1" tab at the bottom a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sam,
On Friday, October 26, 2001, at 05:35:06 AM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to "HTML messages":
> I am wondering if there is a way to change the background color of a
> message received in HTML. On e-mail lists, when a post is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sam,
On Friday, October 26, 2001, at 07:53:19 AM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to "HTML messages":
> I'm not a big fan of HTML e-mail and I guess that is why I use
> the-bat. Someone suggested deselecting the "show HTML automatical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 26, 2001, at 8:04:43 AM PDT, Nick Andriash wrote:
> My gripe is the amount of time and effort that has been put into the
> HTML'ising of TB! when there are outstanding bugs and features yet
> to be implemented.
Hello Nick,
I woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, October 26, 2001 at 7:44:25 PM ,
Nick Andriash wrote about "HTML messages":
> That is one of the main reasons why most of us don't want to
> see HTML in E-Mail and are puzzled as to RITLabs insistence on
> including it. :o(
Nick, as long as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Melissa Reese,
On Friday, October 26 2001 at 10:26 AM PDT, you wrote:
> I would be interested in just which "...outstanding bugs..." you would
> like to see implemented? ;-)
Ha ha ha! Ok, let me re-phrase my statement:
"when there are outsta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Silviu Cojocaru,
On Friday, October 26 2001 at 10:55 AM PDT, you wrote:
> Nick, as long as the developers provide an option to deactivate
> viewing HTML parts by default and as the HTML editor will be
> included, a way for the user to deactiva
Hi Alaeddin,
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 11:15:42 +0400, you wrote:
> Can TB write HTML messages? Is there a way to add a plug in or something
> like that? I could not find any information about it in the help files.
No, TB cannot write HTML messages... at least not yet. There have been mentions
(muc
Hello Jonathan,
> (much to some peoples disgust) or including an HTML feature in
Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity.
Alaeddin
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
Sh'mae Alaeddin,
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, at 11:32:02 [GMT +0400] (08:32 where I live) you wrote:
AM> Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity.
Its seen as a security issue - an HTML rendered would need to be tightly written
to avoid being as full of security holes as OE, for example
Hello Alaeddin!
On Sunday, August 18, 2002 at 9:32:02 AM you wrote:
> Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity.
Not again. Try to search the Archives for threads about HTML mail, you
will find more than one or two heated debates about it.
I am sure someone will answer you on list
>
> Its seen as a security issue - an HTML rendered would need to be
> tightly written
> to avoid being as full of security holes as OE, for example.
>
this makes sense.. the company I work for is paranoid about security and TB
is the corporate standard for this reason I guess.
Alaeddin
__
Hi Adam,
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 10:56:13 +0100, you wrote:
> AM> Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity.
>
> Its seen as a security issue - an HTML rendered would need to be tightly
> written to avoid being as full of security holes as OE, for example.
I wouldn't just say security
Hello Alaeddin,
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 11:32:02 +0400 GMT (18/08/02, 14:32 +0700 GMT),
Alaeddin Muntasser wrote:
>> (much to some peoples disgust) or including an HTML feature in
AM> Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity.
It is not bad for some people, it is bad for all people.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, at 11:15:42 +0400 Alaeddin wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
AM> Can TB write HTML messages?
"Officially", no. "Unofficially", yes. But this is "work of devil".
;-) Nobody loves HTML mail, and if such love ex
It's a bug. Turn off spell checking. However, I set my default editor
to plain text and this allows the spell checker to work then switch
via options/message format to html/plain to send,once I am happy with
the spelling.
--
Bob Volkmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, Ma
On 24 Dec 2001, 11:45:16 AM, JP wrote:
> Does anyone know how or where the settings are to show the entire
> html message in the Bat's viewer. I get part of the message but
> there are question marks where pictures are supposed to be.
click on the message, and view it in your default browser.
-
Hi JP,
On 24 Dec 2001 at 11:45:16 [GMT -0600], you wrote:
J> Does anyone know how or where the settings are to show the entire
J> html message in the Bat's viewer. I get part of the message but
J> there are question marks where pictures are supposed to be.
Sorry, no setting. It's intended
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 15:37:33 -0500GMT (which was 21:37 +0100GMT where I live),
Don Zeigler thought about "html messages in TB viewer" and wrote:
DZ> TB should have an option similar to the one in Pocomail. When viewing an
DZ> html message in Poco, im
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 11:35:19 AM, Don Taylor wrote:
> Anybody have any suggestions?
There is currently a debate on the beta list about whether the latest
betas are ready to be release candidates. I would think it would be
worthwhile to join the beta list, get the link to the beta, and giv
Hello Dwight,
Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 6:41:49 PM, you wrote to TBUDL:
DAC> There is currently a debate on the beta list about whether the
DAC> latest betas are ready to be release candidates. I would think it
DAC> would be worthwhile to join the beta list, get the link to the
DAC> beta, and giv
Hello Don,
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:35:19 -0800GMT (19-3-02, 18:35 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
DT> It started one day when I received an Outlook-created text/HTML combo
DT> message that wouldn't display either the text or HTML portion. After
DT> receiving that message (which long ago has b
23 matches
Mail list logo
