Hello Brian,
On Thursday, December 07, 2000 @ 17:20:44 -0500, you wrote the
following about "Wrapping of quoted text"
Brian> I've noticed that when I reply to any mail, the quoted text
Brian> isn't wrapped at the same line length as my inserted text. Is
Brian> this a known problem or is th
Hello Jan,
(JR == "Jan Rifkinson") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian>> I've noticed that when I reply to any mail, the quoted text
Brian>> isn't wrapped at the same line length as my inserted text. Is
Brian>> this a known problem or is there a way to auto-correct this?
Brian>> Here's an example
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I thought I'd comment on Brian Clark's contribution to the list,
sent on Thu, 7 Dec 2000 17:20:44 -0500:
BC> I've noticed that when I reply to any mail, the quoted text isn't
BC> wrapped at the same line length as my inserted text. Is this a known
BC
Hi List,
On Freitag, 8. Dezember 2000 at 00:46:53 A . Curtis Martin wrote:
> This is true. TB! will not interfere with the formatting of quoted
> material. The wrapping of the quoted material is left intact unless you
> explicitly reformat it.
And IMHO that is exactly the way it should be. Ther
Hello Tobias,
(TW == "Tobias Wrede") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> This is true. TB! will not interfere with the formatting of quoted
>> material. The wrapping of the quoted material is left intact unless
>> you explicitly reformat it.
TW> And IMHO that is exactly the way it should be. There m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07 December, 2000, 8:47 PM, I saw Brian's comments made on
Thu, 7 Dec 2000 20:12:24 -0500, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:
BC> I think I'm just going go with the "it's your crappy mail client"
BC> mentality if someone says anything ab
Hello Curtis,
(ACM == "A. Curtis Martin") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BC>> I've also noticed the New Eudora 5.0 seems to mangle the
BC>> *authors* message -- never mind the quoted reply. Eudora used to
BC>> be a decent client, but now it seems to be an obese monster.
ACM> It was bad plain text h
On 08-12-2000 at 02:50, A. Curtis Martin kindly wrote:
> On 07 December, 2000, 8:47 PM, Brian wrote:
BC>> I've also noticed the New Eudora 5.0 seems to mangle the *authors*
BC>> message -- never mind the quoted reply. Eudora used to be a decent
BC>> client, but now it seems to be an obese monster
On Thursday, December 07, 2000, 7:38:30 PM, Karin wrote:
> It's only now that I importing old Eudora mail into TB (45.000
> mails done, more than half to go) that I really see how flakey
> Eudora's sent message headers are.
> Compare:
> === Eudora sent message header ===
[snipped]
The example
On 08-12-2000 at 15:18, Ming-Li kindly wrote:
> On Thursday, December 07, 2000, 7:38:30 PM, Karin wrote:
>> It's only now that I importing old Eudora mail into TB (45.000
>> mails done, more than half to go) that I really see how flakey
>> Eudora's sent message headers are.
> [snipped]
> The exa
On Saturday, December 09, 2000, 7:40:08 PM, Karin wrote:
>> The example you gave us looks pretty much ok to me.
> 'cept that when I import it in TB, it shows the wrong
> created date: the date of importing instead of the date of
> its actual creation.
That's granted. Your example didn't have th
11 matches
Mail list logo
