Re:Detecting HTML Spam

2003-06-26 Thread Clive Taylor
M> I thought I would comment. I have given up on Popfile after an M> unnaceptable number of crucial false positives, very slow system M> responses, and a lot of work to train. Well, horses for courses, Mark. All I can say is that POPfile helps my spam mountain enormously. There's no system perfor

Re:Detecting HTML Spam

2003-06-26 Thread Mark
T> Any reason why you're not using POPFile? I've been getting a few of T> this type of spam, and POPFile is correctly identifying them all as T> spam. There has been some talk about Popfile on this forum, so I thought I would comment. I have given up on Popfile after an unnaceptable number of cruc