> On Friday, March 29, 2002, 7:00:59 AM, Gene Gough wrote:
> > Well, I used shift-F4 to create this reply without quoting.
Thanks for everyone who replies I think I've got it! Now works fine
for either blank reply or just highlighted quoted via F4.
Dave in Phoenix
> On Thursday, March 28, 2002, 11:54:06 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
> Dwight> Problem must be in your reply template.
OK.. that fixed it Thanks... the only thing I don't like is if you don't
highlight it quotes all the text. I seldom use quoted text or just a
very small amount via highlighting si
> Main Menu/Message/Specials/Reply Quoting selected text. What key
> combination do you show for that? On mine it's F4 and always has been.
> Nick
Yep it shows F4...but all I get is a blank screen with my Signature when
I highlight with mouse and then F4. I pasted above from little review
window.
DAC>>> If I understand your question, the answer is to highlite the text
>and hit F4
I am still confused by this. All I get is a blank reply screen when I
highlight text and use F4 using latest 1.60c Bat and WinXP. This is the
only feature I really miss (being able to highlight and reply and ha
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 17:59:23 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 23, 2000, 8:59:23 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> Saturday, January 22, 2000, 4:10:31 PM, tracer wrote:
>> It wasnt meant as a joke though as I use the PC often at night and I
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:13:32 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 23, 2000, 3:13:32 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> Saturday, January 22, 2000, 1:58:34 AM, tracer wrote:
>> What about white on blue?
Steve> My experience is white on blue pe
MDP> Now, once again to ensure that the point is made and taken: for those
MDP> of you that *haven't* broken the default behaviour by using templates
MDP> which kill reply addresses, replies off-list can be easily made using
MDP> Ctrl-F4. The rest of you know what you're doing and are on your
Hello Allie & all fellow TBUDL members,
Saturday, January 22, 2000, 8:42:34 AM, Allie wrote:
AM> ... I am directing my comments to the persons message to which I'm
AM> replying, however, with the knowledge that the rest of the
AM> subscribers are reading it as well. I see no problem then in
AM>
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:14:07 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, January 22, 2000, 1:14:07 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> There is not a single legitimate argument for it. It is one of those
Steve> things in TB!, along with RE counting, tha
AM> Ah Thomas, why are you acting as if discussions don't resurface
AM> because of new subscribers among other things. Anyway, Steve does make a
AM> good point. He among others dislike seeing their names being associated
AM> with an address that is not theirs. If *you* write a reply to Steve a
>> You obviously have a number of options, including the intentional
>> distortion of my remarks, making snide remarks of your own and
>> disregarding the moderators request to drop the excessive antagonism
>> you've chosen to associate with this thread.
SL> Actually, Doug, they weren't disto
Hello Allie & almost all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 5:56:42 PM, Allie wrote in response to my saying:
>> That bugs must be fixed is a truism. If it's a bug, it must be fixed
>> or squashed, let live, industrialized or released in a field (if a
>> predator, pathogen or paras
Hello Alexander & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 4:27:58 PM, Alexander wrote in response to
my saying:
>> Interesting logic. I wonder how many other TUBDL subscribers share
>> that concern.
When Steve said:
>> SL> That technical requirement doesn't exist in email. I am
>
Hello Steve & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 2:16:00 PM, Steve wrote in response to
Marck's saying:
>> What, all lists are the same?
After Steve said:
SL>>> Other lists are different?
I just tried replying with TB to 6 lists related to my work (which is
not computer rela
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Steve,
SL> Asside from announce-only lists where there are no replies can you
SL> think of a list where replies aren't made to individuals? :)
15 matches
Mail list logo
