Re[2]: Should I dump Outlook 2000?

2002-01-07 Thread Joe Finocchiaro
Monday, January 07, 2002, 1:38:32 PM, you wrote: [...] > (ii) The learning curve is phenomenal; after several months using the > package I'm still learning every day. Unfortunately, most people don't > have the time or motivation for this, and it's a bit annoying when > you've overlooked somethi

Re[2]: Should I dump Outlook 2000?

2002-01-07 Thread Joe Finocchiaro
Monday, January 07, 2002, 4:16:45 PM, you wrote: > On Monday, January 07, 2002, 20:45:03, Joe Finocchiaro wrote: >> Alastair, how 'bout a conglomeration of benefactors? >> Who will see my $20 and raise me $10? > All right, I'll contribute 5 € (and not just because I want to know if > everybody c

Re[2]: Should I dump Outlook 2000?

2002-01-07 Thread Geordon VanTassle
Hello David, Monday, January 07, 2002, 4:53:50 PM, you wrote: DvZ> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- DvZ> Hash: SHA1 DvZ> Hello Han, DvZ> On 7 Jan 2002 at 14:15:24 +0100, Han Thomas [HT] wrote concerning DvZ> 'Should I dump Outlook 2000?': JL>>> What is the biggest downside you have found?

Re[2]: Should I dump Outlook 2000?

2002-01-07 Thread Raj
Thomas, On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, at 10:53:57 [GMT +0800] (which was 8:23 AM where I live) you wrote: TF> If you don't want to use TB's myriad of possibilities but only use a TF> MUA that allows seperate accounts, doesn't run viruses, and is easy to TF> use, TB is for you. 100% agree with you TF> If

Re[2]: Should I dump Outlook 2000?

2002-01-08 Thread Alexis Haeringer
Bonjour Roman, Lundi, le 7 janvier 2002 à 23h16 [GMT +0100] (ce qui correspond à 23h16 ici où j'habite), Roman Katzer =[RK] a écrit à Joe Finocchiaro : RK> If not, how can I set ISO-8859-15 as the default? In in your account properties, go to template and go to "new message" and select "use Cha