Re[2]: TB! v1.48f - ABxxxPPP problem

2001-01-06 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Januk, (TB! AB Entry) On Thursday, January 04, 2001 18:26:17 -0800 you wrote the following in regards to "TB! v1.48f - ABxxxPPP problem": However, I have noticed that many of these problem replies are from eGroups but I don't see why that would make a difference to the

Re[2]: TB! v1.48f - ABxxxPPP problem

2001-01-03 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Januk (Test), On Tuesday, January 02, 2001 18:36:37 -0800 you wrote the following in regards to "TB! v1.48f - ABxxxPPP problem": JA Do you have any AB templates at the group level? I'm not sure JA how you've organised your AB, so this is a bit of a wild guess. Yes. In group properties

Re[2]: TB! v1.48f - ABxxxPPP problem

2001-01-03 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Wednesday, January 03, 2001, Thomas Fernandez wrote: JR Yes. In group properties I found a blank reply template but the JR "Use group-specific template for replies" was checked off. What JR puzzles me is why I would check a blank template for use. Some people want a "blank

Re[2]: TB! v1.48f - ABxxxPPP problem

2001-01-02 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Januk, Thanks for your reply. In Monday, January 01, 2001 17:29:42 -0800 you wrote the following in regards to "TB! v1.48f - ABxxxPPP problem": JanukHi %ABofromHANDLE='%ABofromFIRSTNAME="Hi %OFROMFNAME"' JanukSomething: Januk When this QT is inserted, you should see at a

Re[2]: TB! v1.48f - ABxxxPPP problem

2001-01-02 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Januk, In Tuesday, January 02, 2001 17:58:35 -0800 you wrote the following in regards to "TB! v1.48f - ABxxxPPP problem": Januk [...] see if you have a folder level template. Or maybe your Januk account default template is wrong? Do you use the %ACCOUNT macro in Januk any of your