Hello Mark,
ÖH Another note on Folder view: shouldn't there be a New
ÖH message command?
Marck D. Pearlstone It's not listed in the menu, but Ctrl-N
Marck D. Pearlstone does work from Folder
Marck D. Pearlstone View.
Mark Worsham So does F5.
That explains why Reply is Ctrl-F5 in the message
Hello Havivah,
HDS Views need to be consistently sticky, or not sticky at all.
HDS To my mind it's more logical to have a view stick to a
HDS folder, than to have a view stick to a screen (i.e., main
HDS screen, view message screen, etc.).
I feel like I want to defend the non-sticky-ness of the
A Bat-fellow, A. Curtis Martin,
wrote on Thursday, September 21, 2000 at 16:21:17 (GMT -0500),
which was 23:21 in Bratislava --
ACM Yes. A full-width message list is needed.
OZ You can have it, just press enter at the message in the message
OZ list.
ACM A full-width message list via the main
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, September 21, 2000, Graham wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
The Bat Interface:
G Oleg, I think we're starting to go in circular arguments here. I
Yes.
G find The Bat's interface is very "clunky", not at all what I am used
Are we talking about
Äîáðûé äåíü, Graham,
÷åòâåðã, 21 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2000 ã., Âû ïèñàëè ïî ïîâîäó
The Bat Interface:
G And, despite all the comments, I don't like the editor
Posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on thread 'need text of html editor'
---8-
Ïðåäëàãàþ
Thursday, September 21, 2000,
Graham wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
The Bat Interface:
G Oleg, I think we're starting to go in circular arguments
here.
OYes.
And then they did just that.
Then Oleg asked:
Which capabilities do you
lack?
I woke up and said:
Well, a resident file picker like
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, September 21, 2000, A. Curtis Martin wrote to Paula Ford on TB!UDL about
The Bat Interface:
PF The main window could have more options for configuration of the panes.
ACM Yes. A full-width message list is needed.
You can have it, just press enter at
offlist; we have a TBOT list for that. I am sure there are some people
Umm... unless I'm missing something significant... ie/
[EMAIL PROTECTED], where is TBOT? I've looked everywhere on the TB!
site, and can't find mention of it... ?
--
Hello Paula,
September 21, 2000, 7:06:24 AM, you wrote:
SNIPPED
PF Many people will never get beyond the interface.
Of those who have complained about the interface though, I think we
are short of constructive arguments, as in: what would you like to see
improved?
As a "non-power user "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 06:45:10 -0500
"A. Curtis Martin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess Graham's statement above gives me more insight into his feelings
and what he means by clunky. :-) It would appear to me Thomas, that
Graham dislikes TB!'s raw
You'll find it on egroups. it is a TBUDL spin-off site set up by Jast
a while back. There are quite a few of us there.
snip!
Addresses:
Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTH
Thank you, greatly appreciated. :-)
--
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:46:07 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, September 21, 2000, 12:46:07 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Resounding *THWACK* of scales upon designer stubble as Jamie gets
MDP trouted for restating
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, September 21, 2000, Graham wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
The Bat Interface:
G Apart from that, its definitely a step
G in the right direction.
Is Eudora a right direction? I saw it once. I didn't like interface.
Why do you think it's better?
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
