Re[2]: Update to 1.62 problem

2003-02-28 Thread Deborah W
On Friday, February 28, 2003, 2:45:09 PM, Spike wrote: S> I have found that the new iterations of most browsers can have S> problems with an 'HTTP' download, in that they do it incompletely. It's not a problem I've come across before. I'm using Mozilla, but notice there's another thread currently

Re[2]: Update to 1.62 problem

2003-02-28 Thread Deborah W
On Friday, February 28, 2003, 2:38:18 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: RO> Might be that you have a virus infection. They've been known to RO> corrupt archives. RO> Do you run an up to date virus scanner? Yes - AVG runs on all email, plus a once-a-day full system check. Updates every two days, & it checke

Re[2]: Update to 1.62 problem

2003-02-28 Thread Deborah W
On Friday, February 28, 2003, 12:50:36 PM, Tim Musson wrote: TM> Sorry Deborah, my reply was intended for Adam, but I just started it and TM> it came up with the 'ready to install' splash screen. Did you get that TM> far? You mean the screen where it says "Ready to setup"? Yes, I got that far. T

Re[2]: Update on Access Violation Error

2001-05-07 Thread Ryan Phillips
Monday, May 07, 2001, 11:29:18 AM, you wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi Silviu, MDP> On 07 May 2001 at 20:19:52 +0300 (which was 18:19 where I live) MDP> Silviu Cojocaru wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these MDP> points: SC>> I'm curious about one th

Re[2]: Update on Access Violation Error

2001-05-07 Thread Ryan Phillips
Hello Fred, Monday, May 07, 2001, 9:49:09 AM, you wrote: FvV> On 5/7/2001 Ryan wrote R>> Thanks to David van Zuijlekom, I have received Beta 13 and Beta 14 of R>> the Bat. R>> Beta 13 works great. Any message I want to delete works perfectly R>> fine. R>> Beta 14 will produce the access viol

Re[2]: Update

1999-11-10 Thread Aasmund Birger Jakobsen
Hello Oleg, Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 7:17:23 AM, you wrote: OZ> Hello, the Bat! list recipients, OZ> Tuesday, November 09, 1999, Aasmund Birger Jakobsen wrote about OZ> Update: ABJ>> Get error during installation say`s "Application Corrupted" " ABJ>> Terminated " Any suggestion??? or i

Re[2]: Update

1999-11-09 Thread tracer
Wednesday, November 10, 1999 Hello Ali, Wednesday, Wednesday, November 10, 1999, you wrote: Ali> Hi all, Ali> On Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 1:03:26 PM (-5 GMT), tracer scribbled: >> Thats why killfilters exist >> he is on mine... Ali> Already???!!! Cripes. I only can keep 2 mb on my fi

Re[2]: Update

1999-11-09 Thread AL Capone
I can now receive main but cannot send! HELP! sent through Eudora pro At 05:39 PM 11/9/99 +0100, Roel wrote: > \\\|/// > / ~ _ \ > (- O o -) >--oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- >Hello Steve, > >SL> Tuesday, No

Re[2]: Update

1999-11-09 Thread Adam Gołębiowski
Welcome, Adam wrote: OZ> Most probably file was corrupt while downloading. Re-download it and OZ> try again. I got the same message, i downloaded that file 4 times... oh, and I don`t think it was downloade error, cause it starts installing (imo it unpacks itself) /Adam + [EMAI

Filters gone crasy (was: Re[2]: Update)

1999-11-09 Thread Soth
> Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 8:39:19 AM, Roel wrote: >> don't know about that: if you look at the times the mails were >> created: he generated about 3/minute... >> if it had been a filter they would all have had the same >> creation-time... (unless he's running a 286 at 6 Mhz :-) ) > If you

Re[2]: Update

1999-11-09 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Steve, SL> If you look at the text, it was identical. I doubt that he was typing in SL> identical text at 3/minute. No, but he can copy & p

Re[2]: Update

1999-11-09 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Steve, SL> Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 8:04:19 AM, Soth wrote: >> My friend, posting the same 14k email in response to 3 _unrelated_ >> topics i

Re[2]: Update

1999-11-09 Thread Soth
> Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 8:04:19 AM, Soth wrote: >> My friend, posting the same 14k email in response to 3 _unrelated_ >> topics is very inconsiderate. Not everybody can afford that kind of >> rudeness. > I have a suspicion that it is because he somehow got a filter setup and > doesn't

Re[2]: Update

1999-11-09 Thread Soth
My friend, posting the same 14k email in response to 3 _unrelated_ topics is very inconsiderate. Not everybody can afford that kind of rudeness. Take care, - Marco -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.c