Jeff Gaines said...
> Hello Group
>
> On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 8:33:48 PM, P. wrote:
>
> > So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and
> > guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that
> > helps.
>
> I found BayesIt very poor even after training.
On 8/21/05, Jeff Gaines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
> now and find it much better.
AOL that.
I've never gotten BayesIt to work, and I'm not the most
computer-illiterate person out there. When "c't Magazin" (renowned
German com
Hello Group
On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 8:33:48 PM, P. wrote:
> So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and
> guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that
> helps.
I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
now and find it
Hi John,
JM> let it install it and I've been training it, but I just don't work
JM> anymore, or never did for that mater. I guess I'm going to have to
JM> find something else, I don't know why they chose to bundle a plugin
JM> with TheBat that would take years of training just to get it to work.
Hello Dave,
Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 9:42:05 AM, you wrote:
DT> Thanks Mike
Always happy to be able to give back in some small way for all the
help I have gotten
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows ME 4.90 Build
Hello MikeD,
On Tuesday, November 02, 2004 at 10:56:50 GMT -0500 (which was
16:56:50 where I live), MikeD (3) wrote and made these valuable points
on the subject of "Bayesit":
> Hello Dan,
> Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 8:46:34 AM, you wrote:
DG>> Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:10:40 AM, MikeD wrote:
> and I should also mention that the newest version is 0.7.3 and
> since you are going to have to go through all that anyway, you might
> want to get this version before you go through all that. It is much
> improved over the version that wa
Hello Stuart,
Saturday, October 16, 2004, 9:06:23 AM, you wrote:
SC> Michael is using Version 3 which does not have the "alternative" tab.
I guess I will have to bite the bullet soon and move up to 3
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v
Hello MikeD,
Sunday, September 26, 2004, 8:08:39 PM, you wrote:
SMK>> I'm, using 06.6, which I thought was the latest version. BayesIt hasn't
SMK>> worked well for me since the version that came with The Bat 2.12; I don't
SMK>> remember its version number.
> That would 0.5.11. It is what I con
Hello Paul,
Monday, September 6, 2004, 2:13:39 PM, you wrote:
PJ>>> Can anyone point me to info regarding BayesIT and BayesFilter.
PJ>>> What is the difference between them?
>> BayesIT will actually work if you can get it installed. I've never
>> been able to get the other one to do anything ex
Paul,
PJ>>> Can anyone point me to info regarding BayesIT and BayesFilter.
PJ>>> What is the difference between them?
>> BayesIT will actually work if you can get it installed. I've never
>> been able to get the other one to do anything except grab program
>> focus for a couple of seconds and th
On 21 Jun 2004 at 09:22:21 you wrote:
GD> I would be happy if I could catch 1 spam... :-(
GD> I have SpamAssassin running on the mail server, it throws certain Spam into an IMAP
GD> account for manual proofing - I mark all this and flag as Junk (training
GD> BayesIt)
I don't think bayesit wo
Hello Graham,
Monday, June 21, 2004, 9:22:21 AM, you wrote:
GD> Hello Andre,
GD> Saturday, June 19, 2004, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
AW>> Hello Richard,
AW>> On 19 Jun 2004 at 05:33:38 +0500 GMT [02:33 CEST] you wrote:
RHS>>> I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching about
R
Hello Richard,
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:33:38 AM, you wrote:
RHS> Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:13:08 AM, you wrote:
aacu>> I change to POPFiel from weeks of frsutration with BayesIt slowing
aacu>> down things, crashing the Bat etc.
RHS> I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catc
On Tuesday, April 20, 2004 at 2:13:52 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Marek,
> Monday, April 19, 2004, 5:24:55 PM, you wrote:
MM>> via options "Mark as Junk" and "Mark as not Junk" in Specials menu.
> Since we have to use this now for all the training ... is there a way
> to make these two functions mo
Sunday, April 18, 2004, 2:40:30 PM, you wrote:
RHS> Before it was working normally. I'd been using it for only a month,
RHS> but it was already averaging about 60%, and on a good day would hit
RHS> 85-90%. If I can't get this version to work, I may go back to v.0.4.
I gave up getting v.0.5 to wor
Hi Philip,
On Friday, January 23, 2004 at 3:58 PM, Philip wrote:
> Friday, January 23, 2004, 10:58:14 AM, you wrote:
T>> That's the same question I had. As I have SpamAssassin on the mail
T>> server, most of my spam gets caught and filtered that way, but I was
T>> hoping that this would catch the
Hello Philip,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 9:58:11 AM, you wrote:
PS> However, at the moment, I'm only aware of one free filter plugin for
PS> spam - bayesit - so this very nice feature of The Bat! goes unused as
PS> yet. Hopefully you can now see why the plugin architecture is so
PS> valuable, thoug
18 matches
Mail list logo
