Thanks to all who responded.
JN> Anyone here care to venture an opinion on Merak and Postcast mail
JN> servers? Anyone have another to recommend? Mercury does not include XP
JN> among its supported O/Ss.
--
JN
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TB
Wednesday, March 26, 2003, 1:22:26 PM, Paul wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, 1:39 PM, you wrote:
JN>> Mercury does not include XP among its supported O/Ss.
> I have XP home and I'm using Mercury32 just fine!
I'll second the motion -- I'm using Merc32 on XPPro with no
problems.
--
Dave
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, 1:39 PM, you wrote:
JN> Anyone here care to venture an opinion on Merak and Postcast mail
JN> servers? Anyone have another to recommend? Mercury does not include XP
JN> among its supported O/Ss.
I have XP home and I'm using Mercury32 just fine! I tried Postcast, but
I forgot to say that Postcast is Free and free.
Roberto
Wednesday, March 26, 2003, 1:39:02 PM, you wrote:
> Anyone here care to venture an opinion on Merak and Postcast mail
> servers? Anyone have another to recommend? Mercury does not include XP
> among its supported O/Ss.
> (Seems to be getti
I used Postcast for a while, it works as expected. There are few
annoyances, like e-mail now really going out when you scheduled it to
go out. It is able to handle quite a bit of e-mail volume. You can
also hook it up to a database and keep a serious log of your
operations. I installed it on an W98
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003 at 12:39:02GMT -0600 (which was 1:39 PM where I live)
Joseph N. wrote and made these points on the subject of "SOT: mail servers":
JN> Anyone here care to venture an opinion on Merak and Postcast mail
JN> servers? Anyone have another to recomme
Anyone here care to venture an opinion on Merak and Postcast mail
servers? Anyone have another to recommend? Mercury does not include XP
among its supported O/Ss.
(Seems to be getting tougher and tougher to send mail: first my ISP
prevented me from using its SMTP server because my domain was not
r
7 matches
Mail list logo
