Hi To All You BAT-ty People,
I am trying to hit my e-amil server from work through a LAN and keep
getting a connection failure. The technician from ATT Worldnet said
I needed SSL authentication to connect. Is there any way to do this
with TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jeff,
@ 12:44:26 PM on 10/2/2001, Jeff Worley wrote:
JW> I am trying to hit my e-amil server from work through a LAN and
JW> keep getting a connection failure. The technician from ATT
JW> Worldnet said I needed SSL authentication to co
Hi Brian,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, at 13:11:25 -0400, you wrote:
JW>> I am trying to hit my e-amil server from work through a LAN and
JW>> keep getting a connection failure. The technician from ATT Worldnet
JW>> said I needed SSL authentication to connect. Is there any way to do
The pop3 server needs an SSL authentication, but TheBat! said,
2004-9-10, 12:03:21: FETCH - The server uses TLS protocol version 3.0
which is outdated and insecure (version 3.1 is required)
How can I resolve this problem? Does that mean I can't get letters
from that "TLS protocol v
Hi there Jiang,
On 07:20 10.09.2004, you [Jiang Xu] wrote...
> How can I resolve this problem? Does that mean I can't get letters
> from that "TLS protocol version 3.0" server?
It means that your POP3 server only supports an unsecure version of
the SSL protocol. Unfortunately, TheBat does not al
Hello all,
Friday, September 10, 2004, Jiang Xu wrote:
> The pop3 server needs an SSL authentication, but TheBat! said,
> 2004-9-10, 12:03:21: FETCH - The server uses TLS protocol version 3.0
> which is outdated and insecure (version 3.1 is required)
> How can I resolve this proble
But if I use the plain unsecured connection, the server will not let
me get the letter.
And I can't ask the admin to modify the protocol because it's our
company's mail system which is so large thus can't be modified easily.
Anyway thanks for your help.
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 13:29:38 +0200, Johann
Mavers @ 2004-Sep-12 8:03:04 PM
"Problem about the SSL authentication" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> And I can't ask the admin to modify the protocol because it's our
> company's mail system which is so large thus can't be modified easily.
Could you perh
Hi there Mavers,
On 02:03 13.09.2004, you [Mavers] wrote...
> But if I use the plain unsecured connection, the server will not let
> me get the letter.
> And I can't ask the admin to modify the protocol because it's our
> company's mail system which is so large thus can't be modified easily.
Mhh
What do you mean "stunnel solution"?
Does it mean that I use an unsecured connection? The server disables
the plain unsecured connection and only accepts the SSL.. so it's
very annoying
I think I will give up TheBat! for receiving company mail.
Anyway thanks.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:19:39 +02
Dear Mavers,
On 07:51 15.09.2004, you [Mavers] wrote...
> What do you mean "stunnel solution"?
> Does it mean that I use an unsecured connection? The server disables
> the plain unsecured connection and only accepts the SSL.. so it's
> very annoying
No, I was suggesting that you install stu
Hallo Mavers,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:51:20 +0800GMT (15-9-2004, 7:51 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
M> What do you mean "stunnel solution"?
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this re
12 matches
Mail list logo
