Hello Daniel,
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 3:01:42 PM, you wrote:
DR I'm using Zone Alarm with Mail Safe on and everything works fine, but
DR that's with the latest version of Zone Alarm(3.5.169.002). When we
DR had the previous version of Zone Alarm on the servers, one of our
DR servers was
Hello Michael,
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:55:48 -0600 GMT (19/01/03, 02:55 +0700 GMT),
Michael Disabato wrote:
I've been in this business over 30 years and am one of the people who
selected Zone Alarm. I think I' fit for my job, thank you very much.
I didn't mean to personally insult you, sorry.
Greg,
*** === *** === *** === *** === *** === *** === *** === ***
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 8:42:52 PM, you wrote:
GS Hello Mike,
GS On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, at 02:27:11 GMT + (1/18/2003, 8:27 PM -0500 GMT
GS here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've heard of
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 8:27:11 PM, Mike Alexander wrote:
There seems to be a particular problem with ZA and OSs using the
NTFS filing system. I.e. ZA will work fine on the older consumer (DOS
based) OSs but causes problems when you're running 2K or XP. I've
heard of several other
OK... Here's what I've done so far:
Defragged the disk.
Re-installed Win2k SP2 and security updates.
Re-installed ZoneAlarm (firewall).
Re-installed Trend Micro (virus scanner).
Re-installed The Bat.
Removed ALL the files and am using just the Inbox.
Mail still downloads at normal speed for my
Hi Michael,
On Saturday, January 18, 2003 at 05:37:32 [GMT -0600], you wrote:
MD OK... Here's what I've done so far:
MD [...]
MD Re-installed ZoneAlarm (firewall).
MD [...]
MD Any ideas?
Dump ZoneAlarm. You will find a billion mails about the problems between
ZoneAlarm and TB in the archives.
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, 6:37 AM, you wrote:
MD Defragged the disk.
MD Re-installed Win2k SP2 and security updates.
MD Re-installed ZoneAlarm (firewall).
MD Re-installed Trend Micro (virus scanner).
MD Re-installed The Bat.
MD Removed ALL the files and am using just the Inbox.
MD Mail
Hello Lars,
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 5:48:30 AM, you wrote:
LG Dump ZoneAlarm. You will find a billion mails about the problems between
LG ZoneAlarm and TB in the archives.
Well, there is one minor problem. ZoneAlarm is mandated by corporate
and this is their machine.
LG If you *really*
Hello Lars,
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 7:48:30 AM, you wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Saturday, January 18, 2003 at 05:37:32 [GMT -0600], you wrote:
Dump ZoneAlarm. You will find a billion mails about the problems between
ZoneAlarm and TB in the archives.
If you *really* need a personal firewall,
Hello Michael,
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 08:47:19 -0600 GMT (18/01/03, 21:47 +0700 GMT),
Michael Disabato wrote:
LG Dump ZoneAlarm. You will find a billion mails about the problems between
LG ZoneAlarm and TB in the archives.
Well, there is one minor problem. ZoneAlarm is mandated by corporate
and
Hi Daniel,
On Saturday, January 18, 2003 at 11:01:42 [GMT -0400], you wrote:
If you *really* need a personal firewall, then I'd kindly suggest one
which doesn't mess up your whole system. Kerio is quite good in that
respect although others may think differently about that.
DR I think that if
* Lars Geiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apart from that, a personal firewall is useless from a security POV
Correct.
(this is my personal opinion [...]
No, it is a fact.
and anyone who wants to start a discussion about that, please feel
free to contact me in PM).
Or TBOT?
--
Best
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, 9:47 AM, you wrote:
LG Dump ZoneAlarm. You will find a billion mails about the problems between
LG ZoneAlarm and TB in the archives.
MD Well, there is one minor problem. ZoneAlarm is mandated by corporate
MD and this is their machine.
right, whatever corporate
Hello Thomas,
TF Ask Corporate to educate the people involved in system
TF administration so they become fit for their job.
I've been in this business over 30 years and am one of the people who
selected Zone Alarm. I think I' fit for my job, thank you very much.
TF You mean without delays? Then
Hello Daniel,
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 9:01:42 AM, you wrote:
DR shutdown. If the problem still persists, then I would suggest looking
DR at the virus scanner's settings to make sure that it's not scanning
DR the files of TB. Because, that could slow the process down.
If I select the root
Hello Michael,
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, at 08:47:19 GMT -0600 (1/18/2003, 8:47 AM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, there is one minor problem. ZoneAlarm is mandated by corporate
and this is their machine.
Well you may be between a rock and a hard
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, 2:55 PM, you wrote:
TF You mean without delays? Then ZA appears to be the culprit.
MD ZA is not installed on this system, and with a grand total of 262
MD message now loaded, the delay has come back. Any other suggestions?
how about file indexing, did you turn
Hello Michael,
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 3:58:23 PM, you wrote:
DR shutdown. If the problem still persists, then I would suggest looking
DR at the virus scanner's settings to make sure that it's not scanning
DR the files of TB. Because, that could slow the process down.
If I select the
Hello Daniel,
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, at 17:26:51 GMT -0400 (1/18/2003, 3:26 PM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And, by you not installing ZA and still getting the problem, then you
know ZA is not the source of your problem(but for some on this list it
Hello Greg,
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 5:51:42 PM, you wrote:
I can only say from my experience with WinXP. The problem went away with
a clean install of OS + Software with Kerio. I do know from use of ZAP
from version 1.x forward the uninstall program was NOT clean, and many
users had
Hello Michael,
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 11:37:32 AM, you wrote:
MD OK... Here's what I've done so far:
MD Defragged the disk.
MD Re-installed Win2k SP2 and security updates.
MD Re-installed ZoneAlarm (firewall).
MD Re-installed Trend Micro (virus scanner).
MD Re-installed The Bat.
MD Removed
Hello Greg,
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 9:51:42 PM, you wrote:
GS IIRC the problem with ZA could only be solved with a clean install of OS
GS and software. My memory tells me this was Allie using Win2k. He could
GS tell you otherwise.
GS I can only say from my experience with WinXP. The
Hello Mike,
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, at 02:27:11 GMT + (1/18/2003, 8:27 PM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've heard of several other conflicts on NTFS systems which have been
down to ZA and not just problems with TB.
Well now that you mention it I was
23 matches
Mail list logo
