Re: Thebat! only used by spammers?

2003-07-26 Thread ravi
>>It's a real client, but it seems like nobody other than >>spammers use (or forge) it. Rather insulting. But that aside, do send them this link: http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/spammer.html -- Ravi (http://shell-shocked.org) "If your parents didn't have children, you probably won't eith

Re: Thebat! only used by spammers?

2003-07-26 Thread Deborah W
On Saturday, July 26, 2003, 1:26:04 AM, Doug Weller wrote: DW> I was wondering why my email to my brother kept being rejected. I DW> thought it was rejecting my ISP, but when I switched to a POP3 DW> mailbox hosted independently of any ISP it was still rejected. My DW> host asked why, and was told

Re: Thebat! only used by spammers?

2003-07-26 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Doug, @26-Jul-2003, 06:26 Doug Weller [DW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> It's a real client, but it seems like nobody other than spammers >> use (or forge) it. Please refer this individual to http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/spammer.html and, o

Re: Thebat! only used by spammers?

2003-07-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Doug, On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 06:26:04 +0100 GMT (26/07/03, 12:26 +0700 GMT), Doug Weller wrote: >>That message (or messages from that sender to that recipient) was the >>first non-spam use of an X-Mailer of "The Bat!" in an extremely long >>time. (I went back several months in the logs.) Thi

Thebat! only used by spammers?

2003-07-26 Thread Doug Weller
I was wondering why my email to my brother kept being rejected. I thought it was rejecting my ISP, but when I switched to a POP3 mailbox hosted independently of any ISP it was still rejected. My host asked why, and was told: >That message (or messages from that sender to that recipient) was the >f