Hello Leif,
On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:52:08 -0600 GMT (18/05/2004, 02:52 +0700 GMT),
Leif Gregory wrote:
Thomas In the meantime I have receive it twice for each email address
Thomas I am subscribed with.
LG Good! :-) I really wasn't looking forward to spelunking a bunch of
LG logs to see where it
Dear Thomas,
@18-May-2004, 22:46 +0700 (18-May 16:46 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Leif:
TF ... if you think it helps you if I forward the whole mail to you
TF by PM, just say the word.
It helps not a bit. These mails are useless, which is why Leif sent
out a
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
It helps not a bit. These mails are useless, which is why Leif sent
out a probe with a tracking subject. However, it appears that the
C/R server outwitted the probe and suppressed it as spam without
challenging it :-(.
FYI, I never received the probe e-mail. Maybe the C/R
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 16:52:20 +0100 GMT (18/05/2004, 22:52 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP It helps not a bit. These mails are useless, which is why Leif sent
MDP out a probe with a tracking subject. However, it appears that the
MDP C/R server outwitted the probe and
Dear Thomas,
@18-May-2004, 23:00 +0700 (18-May 17:00 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP It helps not a bit. These mails are useless, which is why Leif sent
MDP out a probe with a tracking subject. However, it appears that the
MDP C/R server outwitted the
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 17:12:28 +0100 GMT (18/05/2004, 23:12 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF Smart. It also means that whoever subscribed with RsikFreeMail
TF doesn't see any of the TBUDL traffic about him, right?
MDP Presactly!
Now that's totally risk free!
Let me
Howdy Mary,
Sunday, May 16, 2004, 11:30:34 PM, Mary wrotened:
MB Hello Martin!
MB On Sunday, May 16, 2004, 5:15 PM, you wrote:
BBT NO FAIR! Put that third one back right away or I'm gonna tell!
RO Why? After all I got four.
MW You're just showing off! :-))
MB I got two, but they were
Hello Ben!
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 1:04 PM, you wrote:
BA oops didnt mean to kill yahoo
Yahoo seems to be a cat with 9 lives--got up and started running as
soon as I answered Martin Webster's P.S. here with info that your post
was the last I'd seen on tbot in nearly 2 days.
--
Best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ben,
On 18 May 2004, 19:04 Ben Allen [BA] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW PS. Anyone picking up TBOT messages? I haven't seen a dickie since
MW Friday. I think I may have a few e-mail problems of my own.
MB Yes, I answered yours on May 15.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck,
On 18 May 2004, 17:12 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TF Smart. It also means that whoever subscribed with RsikFreeMail
TF doesn't see any of the TBUDL traffic about him, right?
MDP Presactly!
It's been quite
Hello Martin!
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 1:50 PM, you wrote:
MW PS. Anyone picking up TBOT messages? I haven't seen a dickie since
MW Friday. I think I may have a few e-mail problems of my own.
MB Yes, I answered yours on May 15. But I've only had one TBOT message to
MB show since then. From Ben
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, May 16, 2004, 10:19:28 AM, you wrote:
Thomas I didn't receive it at all. Do I need to be worried?
Have you still not received it?
I know for the few people who have C/R systems, you didn't get it
because I didn't perform the response piece to your challenge.
--
Leif (TB
Hi Leif,
on Sun, 16 May 2004 23:43:53 -0600GMT, you wrote:
LG Sunday, May 16, 2004, 10:31:24 AM, you wrote:
Peter I didn't receive even one. I feel left out. ;-)
LG Have you still not received it? I still have a few in the queue due to
LG various 500 errors. I'll check back through the SMTP
Hallo Leif,
On Sun, 16 May 2004 23:42:51 -0600GMT (17-5-04, 7:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Roelof Why? After all I got four.
Gregory I'd be interested to see why you got four.
Well, that's easy. I'm subscribed with two different addresses, one
for my regular subscription and one where I
Monday, May 17, 2004, 6:43:53 AM, Leif Gregory wrote:
Hello Peter,
Sunday, May 16, 2004, 10:31:24 AM, you wrote:
Peter I didn't receive even one. I feel left out. ;-)
Have you still not received it? I still have a few in the queue due to
various 500 errors. I'll check back through the SMTP
Hello Leif,
On Sun, 16 May 2004 23:45:09 -0600 GMT (17/05/2004, 12:45 +0700 GMT),
Leif Gregory wrote:
Thomas I didn't receive it at all. Do I need to be worried?
LG Have you still not received it?
In the meantime I have receive it twice for each email address I am
subscribed with.
--
***^\
~~( __ _o Was Mon, 17 May 2004, at 10:07:30 +1000,
@ @ when Robin Anson wrote:
I got three. So far...
I was feeling left out with only one in my inbox, but I just received
another two, so I feel loved again. :-)
Love is all we need. :-)
Indeed, spam makes people
Hello Thomas,
Monday, May 17, 2004, 9:05:52 AM, you wrote:
Thomas In the meantime I have receive it twice for each email address
Thomas I am subscribed with.
Good! :-) I really wasn't looking forward to spelunking a bunch of
logs to see where it went wrong! grin
--
Leif (TB list moderator and
Hello Tim,
Monday, May 17, 2004, 4:35:34 AM, you wrote:
Tim * I am in the changing from one forwarding service to another *
Tim the target of the redirect (@sharrock.demon.co.uk) runs a spam
Tim filtering service
We'll wait to see if it happens.
It shouldn't have gotten marked as spam as it was
Hello Roelof,
Monday, May 17, 2004, 12:50:49 AM, you wrote:
Roelof Well, that's easy. I'm subscribed with two different
Roelof addresses, one for my regular subscription and one where I get
Roelof a MIME digest and both both addresses got hit twice, so that
Roelof makes four messages.
Aha.. I
Hello Peter,
Monday, May 17, 2004, 12:21:35 AM, you wrote:
Peter Don't worry. I found two of them in my inbox this morning. :-)
Positively spoofy. grin
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.11 Beta/5 under Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195 Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 4
Hallo Leif,
On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:55:27 -0600GMT (17-5-04, 21:55 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
LG Aha.. I should have thought about that as I'm subscribed with two
LG addresses too and I got four as well. grin
LG
LG
LG --
LG Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Of course you're
Hello users,
In a few minutes you'll receive a message from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which will be individually addressed to you and have your e-mail
address in the subject line.
You do not need to respond to this message. We are tracking down the
subscriber using a challenge/response system.
Cheers,
Hi Leif,
On Sun, 16 May 2004, at 01:43:10 [GMT -0600] (which was 1:43 AM where
I live) you wrote:
LG In a few minutes you'll receive a message from
LG [EMAIL PROTECTED] which will be individually addressed to
LG you and have your e-mail address in the subject line.
LG You do not need to respond
Hello Leif,
On Sun, 16 May 2004 10:02:38 -0600 GMT (16/05/2004, 23:02 +0700 GMT),
Leif Gregory wrote:
LG In a few minutes you'll receive a message from
LG [EMAIL PROTECTED] which will be individually addressed to
LG you and have your e-mail address in the subject line.
LG Sorry, you may have
Hi Leif,
on Sun, 16 May 2004 10:02:38 -0600GMT, you wrote:
LG In a few minutes you'll receive a message from
LG [EMAIL PROTECTED] which will be individually addressed to
LG you and have your e-mail address in the subject line.
LG You do not need to respond to this message. We are tracking down
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter,
On 16 May 2004, 18:31 +0200 (17:31 local time) Peter Meyns [PM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LG You do not need to respond to this message. We are tracking down
LG the subscriber using a challenge/response system.
LG Sorry, you may
Hi Martin,
on Sun, 16 May 2004 17:56:51 +0100GMT, you wrote:
MW I got two... you can have one of mine! :-)
Now that's generous! Thank you ever so much! ;-)
--
Cheers
Peter
Man will occasionally stumble over the truth,
but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.
Winston
Message received at: 5/16/2004:3:43 AM
LG In a few minutes you'll receive a message from
LG [EMAIL PROTECTED] which will be individually addressed to
LG you and have your e-mail address in the subject line.
LG You do not need to respond to this message. We are tracking down
LG the subscriber using
Dear Dan,
@16-May-2004, 14:46 -0400 (16-May 19:46 UK time) Dan Greenberg [DG]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Leif:
DG This doesn't have anything to do with the daily Netsky worms I've
DG been getting, does it?
Nothing at all. It has to do with a subscriber who is using an
outrageously bad
***^\
~~( __ _o Was Sun, 16 May 2004, at 19:17:59 +0200,
@ @ when Peter Meyns wrote:
MW I got two... you can have one of mine! :-)
Now that's generous! Thank you ever so much! ;-)
I got three. So far...
--
Mica
Current
At 2:49 PM on 5/16/2004, Mica Mijatovic typed ...
M I got three. So far...
NO FAIR! Put that third one back right away or I'm gonna tell!
--
Bill Blinn - Technology Editor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - 5/16/2004 at 5:06 PM
Technology Editor, Newsradio 610 WTVN, Columbus, Ohio
Using The Bat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Roelof,
On 16 May 2004, 00:01 +0200 (16/05/200423:01 local time) Roelof Otten
[RO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M I got three. So far...
BBT NO FAIR! Put that third one back right away or I'm gonna tell!
RO Why? After all I got four.
Hallo Martin,
On Sun, 16 May 2004 23:15:38 +0100GMT (17-5-04, 0:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
M I got three. So far...
BBT NO FAIR! Put that third one back right away or I'm gonna tell!
RO Why? After all I got four.
MW You're just showing off! :-))
Guilty as charged.
MW PS. Anyone
Hello Martin!
On Sunday, May 16, 2004, 5:15 PM, you wrote:
BBT NO FAIR! Put that third one back right away or I'm gonna tell!
RO Why? After all I got four.
MW You're just showing off! :-))
I got two, but they were inedible, so I put them in the trash. :))
MW PS. Anyone picking up TBOT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Roelof,
On 16 May 2004, 00:27 +0200 (16/05/200423:27 local time) Roelof Otten
[RO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW PS. Anyone picking up TBOT messages? I haven't seen a dickie since
MW Friday. I think I may have a few e-mail problems of my
On Sunday, May 16, 2004, 7:49:21 PM, Mica wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M I got three. So far...
Me too... or should that be me three...??? anyhow, I've had three
as well... any more and I'll be thinking it's spam!!! ;)
--
Cheers,
Anne Registered Linux user #345132
***^\
~~( __ _o Was Sun, 16 May 2004, at 23:15:38 +0100,
@ @ when Martin Webster wrote:
M I got three. So far...
BBT NO FAIR! Put that third one back right away or I'm gonna tell!
RO Why? After all I got four.
You're just showing off! :-))
Oh... A little bit. (It seems
On Mon 17 May 2004, 4:49:21 +1000, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
MW I got two... you can have one of mine! :-)
Now that's generous! Thank you ever so much! ;-)
I got three. So far...
I was feeling left out with only one in my inbox, but I just received
another two, so I feel loved again. :-)
--
Hello Roelof,
Sunday, May 16, 2004, 4:01:21 PM, you wrote:
Roelof Why? After all I got four.
I'd be interested to see why you got four.
I only ran the script three times, and the second time was only a subset
of the subscriber list from the first run.
Most everyone should have gotten two, only
Hello Peter,
Sunday, May 16, 2004, 10:31:24 AM, you wrote:
Peter I didn't receive even one. I feel left out. ;-)
Have you still not received it? I still have a few in the queue due to
various 500 errors. I'll check back through the SMTP server logs to
see why you might have gotten missed.
--
41 matches
Mail list logo
