Friday, January 14, 2000, 6:39:05 PM, Jast wrote:
A checkbox option that should be a macro...
I think *all* message-specific options should be macros because this
allows for better automation per template-file-inclusion - you won't
have to go through a dozen folder checkbox options and
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:22:21 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 17, 2000, 3:22:21 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Friday, January 14, 2000, 6:39:05 PM, Jast wrote:
A checkbox option that should be a macro...
I think *all*
Morning Steve Lamb,
Geh, rather have checkboxes so it is clear what is happening and what
isn't. I'd also rather have the sig separated from the template so you can
have a clear sig for each folder without using an include.
I might not be much of a programmer, but to me the template
Morning tracer,
I would like a macro to have in the signatures the various specific address
items which can be overwritten per folder/account. Ie, phone, address,
website etc etc which one can add for different usages. Now what the most
easy and eficient way is to use them,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 1:04:50 AM, Jast wrote:
This way you can easily see what *does* happen.
Assuming your entire template fits in the edit box, which they rarely, if
ever do. The problem here is that if something is a boolean in nature why
have %SINGLERE when you can have a checkbox
Hallo Steve,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:53:08 -0800 GMT (18.01.2000, 00:53 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
SL The problem here is that if something is a boolean in nature why
SL have %SINGLERE when you can have a checkbox near "Reply Counting". I am a
SL programmer and I really don't like cluttering
Hello Jast,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 2:35:33 AM, you wrote:
Morning tracer,
The alternative would be an applet/utility that let's you select the
folders etc. and just set common options which get written to these
folders' options.
I think you've got the winner there. :) The whole beauty
Hello Allie Martin,
On Sat, 15 Jan 2000 10:59:25 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, January 15, 2000, 10:59:25 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
Allie On Sat, 15 Jan 2000 09:50:22 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Allie [..snip..]
Thinking about this more, there
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 02:48:11 +0700, tracer wrote:
[..snip..]
Allie Using multiple accounts to get around global preferences not
Allie configurable on a per-folder basis. Never thought of that but very
Allie interesting indeed. :)
I am using it, just make sure not to download mail with it
Morning Allie Martin,
I'd love to know how. I don't see a checkbox for it. Wait, I bet
it is another #$^#$^$#%ing macro. Nope, a freaking checkbox this time.
I wish RITLABS would stop dicking around and do the configuration right.
Jeez.
See here. Another option you aren't
On Sat, 15 Jan 2000 03:39:05 +0100, Jast wrote:
A checkbox option that should be a macro...
I think *all* message-specific options should be macros because this
allows for better automation per template-file-inclusion - you won't
have to go through a dozen folder checkbox options and
11 matches
Mail list logo
