envelope priority colours

2000-01-11 Thread tracer
Wednesday, January 12, 2000 Hello Bat-users, The current icon for not read to read mail changes but its virtually impossible to see the colour of prioritised emails after being read. Could the red part om the sideflaps be made darker? After having read an email I still like to see wh

Re: envelope priority colours

2000-01-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi tracer, On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:58:18 +0700GMT (12/01/2000, 13:58 +0800GMT), tracer wrote: t> The current icon for not read to read mail changes but its virtually t> impossible to see the colour of prioritised emails after being read. t> Could the red part om the sideflaps be made darker

Re: envelope priority colours

2000-01-11 Thread Steve Lamb
Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 9:58:18 PM, tracer wrote: > Could the red part om the sideflaps be made darker? Sure, turn off high-color icons. ;) -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switch

Re: envelope priority colours

2000-01-12 Thread Alex Sanyukovitch
Hello tracer, Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 7:58:18 AM, you wrote: t> The current icon for not read to read mail changes but its virtually t> impossible to see the colour of prioritised emails after being read. t> Could the red part om the sideflaps be made darker? So why don't you edi

Re: envelope priority colours

2000-01-13 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1:03:00 AM, Alex wrote: Alex>>> So why don't you edit glyphs file? t>> Because if I cannot see it properly others cannot either. > Wow... great logic ;-) There is no problem here! Are you using the high or low color version? The low color version has very distinct

Re: envelope priority colours

2000-01-13 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:14:17 AM, tracer wrote: > Ok, maybe you can explain it, whats the use of a different colour > scheme where you cannot see the colours??? > And why is it called High colour if it hasnt got any (g) No clue. It changed with the new icon set some company designed fo

Re: envelope priority colours

2000-01-13 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 10:25:48 AM, tracer wrote: > Ok, Stefan... a minor cosmetic bug (g) V, not F. Of course my rendering of my name in Esperanto is Stefan so I guess I can live with it. ;) -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ:

Re[2]: envelope priority colours

2000-01-11 Thread tracer
Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:08:46 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 1:08:46 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Thomas> Hi tracer, Thomas> On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:58:18 +0700GMT (12/01/2000, 13:58 +0800GMT), Thomas> tracer wrote:

Re[2]: envelope priority colours

2000-01-12 Thread tracer
Hello Alex Sanyukovitch, On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:50:50 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 9:50:50 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Alex Sanyukovitch wrote: Alex> Hello tracer, Alex> Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 7:58:18 AM, you wrote: t>> The current icon for not rea

Re[3]: envelope priority colours

2000-01-13 Thread Alex Sanyukovitch
Hello tracer, Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 6:46:34 PM, you wrote: Alex>> So why don't you edit glyphs file? t> Because if I cannot see it properly others cannot either. Wow... great logic ;-) There is no problem here! Alex>> Please, move "-- \n" before your "Best regards,"! ;-)) t> Best reg

Re[2]: envelope priority colours

2000-01-13 Thread tracer
Hello Steve Lamb, On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:20:01 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 11:20:01 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: Steve> Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1:03:00 AM, Alex wrote: Alex So why don't you edit glyphs file? t>>> Because if I cannot s

Re[2]: envelope priority colours

2000-01-13 Thread tracer
Hello Steve Lamb, On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:37:33 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Friday, January 14, 2000, 12:37:33 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: Steve> Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:14:17 AM, tracer wrote: >> Ok, maybe you can explain it, whats the use of a different colour >

Re[2]: envelope priority colours

2000-01-13 Thread tracer
Hello Steve Lamb, On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:49:08 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Friday, January 14, 2000, 1:49:08 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: Steve> Thursday, January 13, 2000, 10:25:48 AM, tracer wrote: >> Ok, Stefan... a minor cosmetic bug (g) Steve> V, not F. Of co

Signatures: (Was Re: envelope priority colours)

2000-01-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:50:50 +0200, you wrote: > >Please, move "-- \n" before your "Best regards,"! ;-)) > What's the benefit? Do you filter on those,or does the bat treat them special? I like to put my Best Regards before the --, but what I consider a "sig" after the --. The reason is, I cons

Re: Signatures: (Was Re: envelope priority colours)

2000-01-12 Thread Alex Sanyukovitch
Hello cid, Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 5:09:19 PM, you wrote: cin> What's the benefit? Do you filter on those,or does the bat treat cin> them special? cin> I like to put my Best Regards before the --, but what I consider a cin> "sig" after the --. cin> The reason is, I consider my Signature, o